I have the answer to this age old question. There are two ways that a sub-prime borrower may benefit from this.

 The first is in the rate. A subprime borrower is someone that has not so perfect credit

including but not limited to:repossession,Bankruptcy,tax-leins, just to name a few there is considerably more risk to

do a loan for someone in this position. Based on the credit history, they show that they have already had

 situations that caused them to default on payments. The Rate on a sub-prime loan is much higher than a

conventional loan due to the risk involved. With the payment so high,it makes it harder for the borrower to ratio

(qualify).  By adding a prepay penalty- we are able to pass on a reduction to the rate . This is because the

investor will offer a better rate if they are guaranteed that they will be able to service the loan for a given amount

 of time.The second advantage is that it is normally a 2-3 year pre-pay penalty. If you understand how the fico

 system works, you know that your credit score is based on your last 2yrs credit history. The prepay penalty

allows the borrower the chance to rebuild their credit over the two years. This will raise their score and may allow

them to refiance into a convention loan program with a better interest rate.

 

8 Comments on Why add a pre-pay penalty to a subprime loan?

OCT
05
2007
3 Featured Posts
Hi Shaun: I miss the sub prime loans...I thought nobody was doing these anymore?
10:32am • #1
1 Featured Post

This is good information and thank you. 

I had no idea that FICO scores are based on you last 2yrs credit history.  Also, I didn't realize too the reason for the pre-payment history. 

Thanks for the information and the education. 

Please write more. 

10:34am • #2

Lania-It is amazing how mis-informative the media can be. I can assure you that subprime loans are still available. The guidelines have been restricted. Before a person with subprime credit could get 100% financing.Now they have to put down up to 20% down. So, someone that has money or equity can still get a loan. They just can't get 100% anymore.

10:38am • #3
124,017 Points 4 Featured Posts

Shaun - I like your posts.  Just be sure to keep the pre-pay penalty within the adjustment period.  I've seen 2 year ARMs with 3 year pre-payments - that's just bad business.

Also, to clairfy - FICO takes into account the entire 7 year period with an emphasis on the last 2 years.  If a client has collections outside of 2 years it is still effecting the credit score, just not as dramatically as items that occur within the last 2 years. 

10:46am • #4
480,278 Points 151 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Shaun.....  I semi disagree to why so many look at this as a 2 year band aide. First off, you can raise someone's credit score pretty quickly in 6 months to a year. Especially with a mortgage on their credit report. Secondly, FHA allows for less than perfect credit and as of now, for the most part, has the same requirements on BK's as subprime does. Sure, about 1 1/2 years ago, you could be one day out of BK with a credit score of 620 and do 100% financing. With a FHA, you don't even have to be discharged on a Ch 13 with FHA, just being in it for 12 months with a perfect history.

Overall, I have a concern with a comment as Lania mentioned. Why does she miss these?  Sure, they did help some people. But FHA was always over-looked because it took a little more elbow grease.

Sorry if am babbling....  the main issue for pre-payment penalties as you mentioned is that the lender needs to recoup their monies and make money. The credit on the other hand isn't as much of an issue 2 yrs down the road. Besides, with the higher rate and payments, it sometimes ruined that persons credit because they got in over their head. Just my opinion.

My whole point... if there wasn't a prepay, I would bet that I could refinance many in 1 year under FHA, if they had gone the subprime route to begin with. My comments aren't meant to be harsh, just in a debating and thought provoking manner. thanks for sharing this...

jeff belonger

10:47am • #5

Kateyou are right. The total credit package does go back as far as 7 years. But if you go through a bankruptcy or fix your credit , you can raise your score in 2 years or less. If you have a late payment that is more than 2 years old it will not continue to drop your score. Your score would have already dropped due to it being in the last 2 years.

Jeff-  The FHA EXPERT has spoken. Good to see you Jeff. I agree 100% If you can get them into an FHA VS. A Subprime, they will be better off. This was a post based on a Realtor not understanding why a subprime customer would have a pre-pay penalty.

11:03am • #6
480,278 Points 151 Featured Posts Outside Blog

okay..... my opinion is that some people might have been better off if they went with the higher rate and no pre-pay...  but 2 problems here. Lenders couldn't really make much on the YSP then and many people wouldn't straighten out their credit in a year or sometimes it would get worse. Making it harder to refinance into a lower rate and term.

jeff belonger

11:54am • #7
Jeff-Some loan officers/brokers used this to lower the rates so that the borrower would meet qualifying ratios. I am not supporting this practice I am only making it public. If you don't qualify,you don't qualify.
12:27pm • #8

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

SHAUN WREN

Lakeland, FL

More about me…

LICENSE IS NOT PLACED

Cell Phone: (863) 860-5680

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find FL real estate agents and Lakeland real estate on ActiveRain.