Newspaper The Americas
Published 11-21-2006
WASHINGTON (EFE)
The people who use Internet to disclose informaci?de another source nonser?responsables if the material is considered difamatorio, seg?dictamin?oy the Supreme Court of California.
The opinion reverts one decisi?previa of a court of appeals and endorses a federal law that frees to the individuals of responsibility when they distribute, without being the source, material difamatorio.
Reconocemos that granting ample immunity to redifusi?difamatoria in Internet has consequences problem?cas., indic?l m?mo Californian court.
Supreme state a?i?ue, until the Congress decides to review the law on the matter, those that maintain that they were defamed in Internet s? to podr?buscar compensaci?de the original source.
The judges of the Supreme one gave as?espuesta in the opinion raised by two doctors who support? that the demanded one, Ilena Rosenthal, and other people hab? distributed to electr?cos post office and messages to trav?de the network in which they disclosed previous affirmations that pon? in prohibition the capacity of the m?cos.
Rosenthal, on the other hand, sosten?que their actions was protected and was immune in agreement with the established thing by the well-known law like Communications Decency., of 1996.
That law maintains that ning?proveedor or usuary of a computer the publisher or spokesman of ning?tipo can be considered like of informaci?facilitada by third.
A court of appeals of hab?dictaminado California that the suppliers of services by Internet and the users pod? to be declared responsible if they published informaci?que knows is difamatoria.
Comments(1)