Special offer

Follow Up on a Bankruptcy Court Decision Regarding the "Produce the Note" Defense

By
Real Estate Attorney with http://www.medicalandspaconsulting.com

As a follow up to my blog from last evening, I am reviewing the recent Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) decision that has far reaching implications on all short sales.  I am reviewing the decision with several colleagues because this will have a substantial impact on foreclosure and short sales.

Our collective review indicated that it is clear that this decision means that lenders will no longer get relief from the automatic stay in bankruptcy unless or until they prove that they possess the original note and thus have standing to sue (or get relief from the automatic stay).  This case will be cited by attorneys in all foreclosure defenses (not just in bankruptcy). This is especially true because the decision was from a federal appellate court.

HOWEVER, as I discussed the case with a colleague and reviewed the decision further…it appears that there may be ground breaking additional news.  The language in the decision seems to indicate that a lender may only foreclose up the to the value of the collateral and NOT the amount owed!!  This will put HUGE pressure on lenders to modify existing loans and approve short sales.  As an example, let’s assume that a home owner is in default on a $400,000 note and that the property value is about $200,000. Reasonable assumptions.  Under this new decision, the lender can only foreclose up to the property value or $200,000.  Deficiency judgments would be a thing of the past and lenders would have to write down values etc.  Lenders would have to consider lower short sale offers too.

I will be presenting more about this on a syndicated radio show in the future and will be posting more information as well. Yes, this is a bankruptcy court opinion but it is from a federal court and an appellate court. Since my father was an appellate court judge, I have the deepest respect for the appellate courts.

 

Comments (22)

Lenn Harley
Lenn Harley, Homefinders.com, MD & VA Homes and Real Estate - Leesburg, VA
Real Estate Broker - Virginia & Maryland

You wrote: "The language in the decision seems to indicate that a lender may only foreclose up the to the value of the collateral and NOT the amount owed!!"

Next question:  Will this apply to ALL home owners in foreclosure or just petitioners in bankruptcy???

Jun 23, 2011 11:25 PM
Paddy Deighan MBA JD PhD
http://www.medicalandspaconsulting.com - Vail, CO
Paddy Deighan J.D. Ph.D

that will be debated...some courts will look to this as binding..especially since it is from an appellate court,. Others will distinguish the facts and decide based upon the facts presented in that particular case.  In should put pressure on lenders to modify and approve short sales...because they will not want to foreclose if they are limited to the value of the collateral

Jun 23, 2011 11:44 PM
David O'Doherty
Clayton, NC
Clayton NC Homes, Raleigh, NC

Very interesting, and it appears you say it will apply to all foreclosure defenses

Jun 23, 2011 11:48 PM
Bryant Tutas
Tutas Towne Realty, Inc and Garden Views Realty, LLC - Winter Garden, FL
Selling Florida one home at a time

Paddy. Doing away with the deficiency would be huge. Especially in States like Florida where the lenders have 5 years to sue for a deficiency judgment. BUT I'm not sure this is something I agree with it if it happens. Lenders should have the right to collect what's owed them. There would have to be exceptions made. What about property investors who are just short selling because the values have declined? Should they be able to just get off without any ramifications at all?

And just to be clear I handle short sales for investors and strategic defaulters. We work hard to negotiate a settlement so the borrowers don't have to worry about the judgment in the future. But it's a mutual agreement between the borrower and the lender/investor. Taking the possibility of a judgment way is really going to weight things in favor of the borrower.

I'll have to ponder this some more.

Jun 24, 2011 12:04 AM
Fernando Herboso - Associate Broker MD, & VA
Maxus Realty Group of Samson Properties - Clarksburg, MD
301-246-0001 Serving Maryland, DC and Northern VA

It makes sense. . I hope that this will help clear out the distressed properties in the market so we can start moving forward once again. 

Jun 24, 2011 12:06 AM
Mike Cooper, Broker VA,WV
Cornerstone Business Group Inc - Winchester, VA
Your Neighborhood Real Estate Sales Pro

Paddy, thanks for the great information.  And, thanks for keeping us up to date on this issue.  It's important and fascinating at the same time!!

Jun 24, 2011 12:26 AM
Keith Lawrence
Christie's International - Mahwah, NJ
ABR, SFR

It will be interesting to see what happens.

 

There is a huge amount of distressed properties that have to move and this would start the process.

Jun 24, 2011 12:54 AM
Brien Berard
Remax Professionals Laurel MD - Laurel, MD
Maryland Real Estate Agents - Laurel Real Estate

This just keeps  changeing every day.  I don't know what to think.  Crazy, crazy, crazy......

Jun 24, 2011 01:33 AM
Dan Edward Phillips
Dan Edward Phillips, Humboldt and Del Norte Counties, CA - Eureka, CA
Humboldt and Del Norte Counties, CA

Good Morning Paddy, this is excellent news for home owners who are truly upside down.  I will be watching fo radditional updayes.

Jun 24, 2011 01:46 AM
Tni LeBlanc, Realtor®, J.D.
Mint Properties, Lic. #01871795 - Santa Maria, CA
Tenacious Tni (805) 878-9879

Thanks for keeping me up to date Paddy!  The lawyer in me has to ask for the case cite so I can go read it.  We are so lucky in CA that deficiencies on first mortgages are not that much of an issue anymore on short sales.

It's those dang seconds.  

Jun 24, 2011 01:52 AM
Tim Maitski
Atlanta Communities Real Estate Brokerage - Atlanta, GA
Truth, Excellence and a Good Deal

I'd love to make an informed comment here but it's tough to do when there's no link to the court decision and there's not even a reference of what case you are talking about.  I ask because there have been several cases recently on similar issues.

Jun 24, 2011 02:21 AM
Jim Gilbert
Samson Properties - Fairfax, VA
The Gold Homes Team

Well, sir, where is the link to the source of your information?  Or are you just teasing your radio show?

 

Jun 24, 2011 02:46 AM
Mike Morrison
Will & Will Real Estate Brokers, The Woodlands, Texas - Houston, TX

Paddy, I would like the link to the case. Let's think about this a second. If the court, in essence, is forcing the lender to mark-to-market the asset value. The king will not let this fly.

Mark-to-market was waived by the FASB for the TBTF's. I agree they should mark-to-market but, think of the implication in the big picture. Mark-to-market = Insolvent Banks. The Executive branch will not let this see the light of day. After all, when has the Executive branch followed the law lately? War Powers Act comes to mind.

No, don't get too excited, remember, we are ruled by executive order and the TBTF's, not the rule of law. 

Jun 24, 2011 03:32 AM
Carla Muss-Jacobs, RETIRED
RETIRED / State License is Inactive - Portland, OR

Let's hope that this will mean short sales will be approved in greater numbers now.  Thanks for the easy to understand report.

Jun 24, 2011 05:28 AM
Renée Donohue~Home Photography
Savvy Home Pix - Allegan, MI
Western Michigan Real Estate Photographer

This is interesting and I have seen something similar recently.  I wonder where I saw it now.  Is there a link for us??  I am no lawyer but this would definitely make an impact in my area.

Jun 24, 2011 05:49 AM
Bill Gillhespy
16 Sunview Blvd - Fort Myers Beach, FL
Fort Myers Beach Realtor, Fort Myers Beach Agent - Homes & Condos

Hi Paddy,  Thanks for keeping us updated on this issue.  Ability to recover up to the current value of the asset will certainly force some lenders to get serious !  Have a terrific weekend !

Jun 24, 2011 06:57 AM
Ray Waisler
Finance of America - Atlanta, GA
NMLS #6621 - Specializing in Jumbo FHA & VA

Paddy, this is very interesting, but I wonder how the lenders will react moving forward and will this tighten up lending further or just increase the amount of paperwork the borrower will be forced to sign?

Jun 24, 2011 07:42 AM
Pamela Seley
West Coast Realty Division - Murrieta, CA
Residential Real Estate Agent serving SW RivCo CA

I look forward to your future posts on this topic. I hope you provide a link to your radio show. This almost sounds like a bankruptcy principal cramdown on primary residences but not called that? I know it was up for vote in congress a couple years back but didn't fly. If it had, there would have been a mass exodus to  bankruptcy courts (at least in my county).

Jun 24, 2011 08:30 PM
Paddy Deighan MBA JD PhD
http://www.medicalandspaconsulting.com - Vail, CO
Paddy Deighan J.D. Ph.D

I will be on talk radio in the Palm Desert area on Wednesday evening at 6:05 PM. The producer will probably ask me to speak about current state of loan modifications.  You can listen on newstalk920.com

Jun 24, 2011 09:10 PM
Christine Donovan
Donovan Blatt Realty - Costa Mesa, CA
Broker/Attorney 714-319-9751 DRE01267479 - Costa M

Paddy - This could make things very interesting.  Like Tni, I would love the cite for this case.

Jun 28, 2011 04:00 PM