|
Find MI real estate agents and Birmingham real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
17 Comments on FTC Settles With One of Two Michigan MLS's Over Minimum Service Rules
I scooped Inman. Now there is a first. I agree with you, Rich. This is big. I, for one, hope that Realcomp holds out. But it will be hard. They are bigger than mirealsource though.
PS. I always have more than enough room for your comments (and everyone else's).
Since perception is reality, what do you see as public reaction to this? An admission of an error in judgement? A necessary change? Will they care or understand? I'm not sure I know how to answer that part. The FTC is not my favorite and I'm thinking they probably WOULD go ahead and fight this issue with all of their guns. I guess I'm coming down on the side of inevitability? I also wonder how this would affect individual companies that currently choose to keep certain listings off their websites. This really is a huge issue.
Public perception will be: "huh? who cares?" I think the issue requires some pretty specific industry knowledge to understand. I also think that the public thinks that the MLS is a public utility. They just want to see all the houses available. The public really doesn't care if we get paid.
Yes, something like it might be inevitable, but I don't think the government should be bullying the mls's or NAR.
We were fortunate in Illinois that the State came forward and made a law to determine that even limited service had basic fiduciary duties of representation. This dealt a severe blow to the hands off - no touch - small fee guys. This removes the onus from the MLS and creates a more level playing field.
How can they "fix" something they refuse to understand?
kk
I agree with Maureen's comment about the public's perception being "huh? who cares?". I think the only ones who truly care are those in the industry and a very tiny percentage of consumers even know about any of these FTC complaints, much less fully understand the issues involved.
Maureen, good for you in scooping Inman... and thanks for joining the MLS Issues group and adding this timely post to it. I've been busy this week so I haven't had a chance to really put a quality post out there about the group, but I do hope it will become a useful and informative place where we can bring about discussions on any/all MLS issues and MLS-related issues.
KK, I agree. The government is trying to fix something they don't understand. Illinois was smart to deal with minimum service issues already. We haven't been successful with that in MI.
I'm going to pipe in a little late, but I wasn't reading your blog when you posted this (a problem I have since corrected.) When I typed this comment is started looking more like a post, so I moved it to my page here.