I spent much of this weekend on a letter writing campaign to congress, over an issue that has deeply disturbed me as of late surrounding the US financial markets and has a huge impact on the real estate industry.  My most recent letter is below...

Dear Sir,

I've written previously about very disturbing events currently taking place in the US banking and financial system.  Articles published in the last two days in both the Wall Street Journal and the New York Times point to a new and even more disturbing development.  First to give some background...

During the previous five years banks provided trillions of dollars in high risk loans primarily in the residential mortgage space.  While the media has frequently labeled it as the "sub-prime crisis" the largest amount of high risk loans lie outside of the sub-prime sector.  Recent studies have shown that high LTV, no-doc and exotic loan products such as Option ARMs have much more impact on defaults than credit score.  In fact we are now begining to see higher default levels on high LTV prime loans than many sub-prime loans.

Many of the large financial institutions and banks are currently holding hundreds of billions of dollars of these loans "off balance sheet" in SIVs (Special Investment Vehicles) and conduits.  These off balance sheet vehicles create an intentionally false view of a firm's financial conditions making banking regulation impossible.  A primary factor in the implosion of Enron was the fact that they were able to hide liabilities and losses in conduits until losses became realized all at once and they had to take them back onto their balance sheet. 

Earlier this year the assets held by these banks off balance sheet began to take heavy losses due to the underlying loan defaults.  Many large banks faced having to take these loans back on balance sheet, an action which would have caused the banks themselves to take large write downs.  At this time The Federal Reserve took an unprecedented step in issuing "23A Exemption Letters" letters to six of the largest banks including Bank of America, JP Morgan and Wachovia. 

These letters exempted them from "safety valve" regulation (Regulation W) that had been on the books since the great depression and prohibited more than 10% of bank's regulatory capital being allocated to a single affiliate.  This exemption allowed these banks to pump more money into their distressed off balance sheet vehicles and avoid realizing losses on balance sheet.  It did nothing to solve the real problem and simply allowed banks to put three times as much of their capital (bank deposits) at risk.  In essence it bailed out bank investors from taking significant losses while significantly increasing the risk of a bank failure. A single bank failure of this magnitude would easily wipe of the $50B FDIC fund, mean congress would be forced to step in and use tax payer money to cover the rest.

In a turn of events reported by both the Wall Street Journal and The New York Times, the Treasury Department is in confidential talks with heads of many of these large banks to create a "Super Conduit" that would be used to buy assets from the individual banks SIVs and conduits.  The claim is that there is nothing wrong with the underlying assets (yeah right) but since no one will buy them at (I wonder why) it is stalling the financial markets.  All this will do is further delay losses for investors in a few large financial institutions that took inappropriate risks, while further spreading the risk throughout the banking system.  This is the exact same type of deception that lead to the S&L crisis in the ‘80s, hundreds of bank failures and a $250b tax payer funded bailout.

Link to article:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/14/business/14bank.html?_r=2&oref=slogin&oref=slogin

Congress must act to exert its constitutional authority to regulate the banking system before it becomes too late to avert another crisis.

  1. Congress MUST act to ban off balance sheet vehicles (SIVs and conduits) as they have no legitimate use other than to obscure the true state of company's finances and evade taxes.
  2. Congress MUST exert its constitutional authority to regulate the banking system and demand that The Federal Reserve immediately revoke these six "23A Exemption Letters" before more depositors are put at risk.
  3. Congress MUST NOT bail out mortgage companies and investors who voluntarily entered into risky mortgage and derivative contracts due to lax lending standards, poor due diligence or as a matter of business policy. 
 

7 Comments on My letter to congress

OCT
14
2007
613,624 Points 95 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router
Great letter, Matt. Well thought out and right on the money. I so agree can I copy and paste and send to my Congressman in Michigan ?
4:38pm • #1
145,181 Points 4 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog
Hi Matt,  Thank you for bringing this to my attention.  I will write to my congressman about this.
4:40pm • #2
1,090,230 Points 57 Featured Posts

Yes, please send it on if you agree with the issues...

Why I think it's so important to the real estate industry?

Even most loan officers will admit lending over the last five years has been the most lax that it's ever been.  This resulted in the real estate tremendous boom we had, but it also comes at a future cost.  If we ignore the problem and something does in fact blow up on us, lending standards are going to tighten extremely fast and rates will spike as investors demand a much higher risk premium.  This would make the subsequent real estate down many times more severe.

4:48pm • #3
OCT
15
2007
145,181 Points 4 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Hi Matt--I did write to my congressman.  I would like to know if you know of somewhere else to blog about issues that we want the public to be aware of.  Also, Washington State sites.  

Thank you, 

1:12pm • #4
1,090,230 Points 57 Featured Posts

Leslie, a petition around this issue just went online about an hour ago.  Check out:

http://financialpetition.org/

 

10:17pm • #5
OCT
17
2007
1,090,230 Points 57 Featured Posts

There was FINALLY some good main stream media coverage of this over at the Wall Street Journal, a great read.

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB119249738008460181.html?mod=yahoo_hs&ru=yahoo

 

4:19pm • #6
FEB
06
2008

From; Richard J. Pollak 4541 C.R. 138a Alvin, TX. 77511 

 CLERK OF THE BANKRUPTCY COURT Case # 02-{!!!!!}-H3-13 Case closed then Reopened only to allow overcharges return, Twice.

 The B.B.B. Reduced Washington Mutual Rating to Insufficient for Three Years from Failure to Supply RESPA Loan History requested, Two 1/2 Years Ago Pretrial, also Judgment Awarded $1,000.00 for Failure to Supply RESPA Section 6' Loan History requested!

Entire Trial was Predetermined {Protected under Judge "SEAL"} Defendant was revised to Former Corporate entity, Change of Venue or Jury Trial formally requested!

Lender Admitted Fault Pretrial.
Judge failed to Arbitrate.
Appellate Judge failed to reopen.
FIFTH CIRCUIT failed to reopen.
Appellate Attorney failed to Verse Merits or Supply Case to Printer for U.S. SUPREME COURT review.

Now Washington Mutual has returned Core Mortgage Arrearages that Forced Bankruptcy filing, in essence reversing Judgment repeating fault admittance!

DISPUTE = Trustee Overcharges $6,612.67 Due.
DISPUTE = Form 1098/Homeside Lending $383.88 Due.
DISPUTE = Washington Mutual $1,155.01 Due
Total Due = $8,151.56.
DISPUTE = Washington Mutual 6 1/2 Years Day-Rate Damage to be determined!
DISPUTE = Trial requesting change of Venue or Jury!

1. $383.88 = Homeside Lending Form 1098 @2
2. $2085.00 = $885.00+$1,200.00 Attorney Fee's @3B
3. $1,878.36 = San Antonio Federal Credit Union revised Payment Book @3C
4. $2.649.31 = San Antonio False Charge @3E
5. $200.00 = Washington Mutual Unpaid Interest on Judgment Posted $1,000.00 times 24 Months @4A
6. $955.01 = Washington Mutual Returned Core Bankruptcy Arrearages 1/2 Interest remains Due. @4B
7. Bank One Payments Misdirected 6 1/2 Years Damages for Misapplications of $1,565.14? @5B Accounting Interest, Action and Results Damages!

Every one of these Seven have been Disputed without resolve, Interest of 10% Paid to Trustee relates Damages acquired.

Homeside Lending, Reported Form 1098 $383.88 @2

Trustee's Due - Original Attorney $2,085.00 @3B
Trustee/San Antonio Due @3C $1,878.36 + @3E $2.649.31 = $4,527.67 Due.
Total Trustee @3B, @3C, @3E = $6,612.67 Due.

Washington Mutual Due @4A $200.00 + @4B $955.01 = $1,155.01

Total Due $8,151.56 Plus Day Rate Damages from September, 2001 to Date, from Washington Mutual Due.

@1A. Judge saw fit to State on Judgment, assertion assumption of My being Predisposed for Bankruptcy.

B. Judge Cropped "DEED OF TRUST" Contract by Edit, Lenders "General Terms and Conditions" was Breached Testified Escrow Mismanagement's "common practice" Defense!

C. Judgment Quoted partial Paragraph omitting Substance to revise intent, done without Publication to formulate "Case Law" dispute as Colluded!

D, Colluded Pretrial, Protected under "Seal," Defendant change from Washington Mutual to Homeside Lending, a Preexisting Corporate Lender that held Note Prior, blanketed under Washington Mutual Support, Loan Originator Damages was Muted Pretrial in the Eye of the Judge, by the Judge, {the foremost primary Substance of Case.} "Seal" Hobbled my defense be it Judge and Lender, or Judge and Lender and My Attorney.

E. Judge changed Defendant of Record from Homeside Lending to Washington Mutual allowing Washington Mutual Attorney to Defend and Place Homeside Lending on Stand to Testify, My Case was Proved by Lender Admittance Pretrial, Judge failed to award Damages for Lender Admittance's.

F. Same Judge Confirmed Bankruptcy and Core Adversary Hearings and Over-Ruled Personal Order, Commanding My Attorney at Recorded Bankruptcy Conformation Hearing {to File "Proof of Claim" on My behalf} then failed to recall, {minutes under "Seal"} relating time expired fault, in Judgment.

G. Judge failed to admit into Evidence Letter Drafted with Attorney, Sent by My Attorney "Certified Mail" requesting Loan Payment History, REQUIRED DISCLOSURE RESPA Section 6 called "qualified written request." lacks Response or Resolve to Date.

H. Judge Posted US Mail 100 Days following Trial, Judgment backdated Two Days by administration, and Ignored "RULE" Bankruptcy's Guideline, that extended Appeal Days for clarification.
To explain; Six Days Received, Eight Days Used, Twelve Days expired, Ten Days Allowed? {Excusable Neglect Argued} Five additional Days Bankruptcy "RULE" Precedent Ignored by Judge.

I. Second Appellate Judge reviewed My Case Docketed first directly following the Main ENRON Trial as seated Judge in the same Court House, for to allow My Case on Merits Required Judge Reprimanding for all the above, @1A, @1B, @1C, @1D, @1E, @1F, @1G.

J. Repeat Scenario by New Orleans FIFTH CIRCUIT Courts, Merits required Reprimanding. @1I, @1H.

K. Appellate Attorney failed to supply Case to Printer for U.S.A. Supreme Court Review, actual Merits were unexplored and not perfected only Excusable Neglect.

@2. Bank One Received all Payments in 2001, Loan Transferred to Homeside Lending November, 2001 receiving "0" Funds in 2001, reported on I.R.S. Mortgage Interest Statement $383.88 Form 1098, $383.88 Due.

@3A. Original Attorney Ignored Order from Judge to File My "Proof Of Claim" before additional allocated set-back Time expired.
Bankruptcy Conformation was Suspended for Six Weeks allowing, failing his Duty he Quit, but Trustee rewarded!
Dispute First Compensation, Reported Quit Case after 10 Months. $885.00 Due.
Dispute $1,200.00 Second Compensation, Recorded to Courts he Quit Case after 14 Months. $1,200.00

B. Trustee Statements Detailed Original Attorney Received $1,200.00 after Courts 90 Day Dispute Time-frame had expired, Today's Trustee Account Summary fails to detail @3A document covets disbursement.
Dispute = @3A $885.00 + $1,200.00 = $2,085.00 Due

C. Attorney Re'termed San Antonio Federal Credit Union, Auto Loan Principal by extension of Months Financed, Posting new Coupon Book that added Three Months, Timed with Quiting Case, Loan was Current. $1,878.36 Due

D. San Antonio Federal Credit Union denied it Re'termed with Letterhead Coupon Book at hand, but also Re'termed Loan Principal by extension of Months Financed adding Two Months, found by researching @3C, received requested amortize payoff, Loan was Current, Germaine to Repossession, Payments halted for surrender.

Timed with @1F being Ignored, RESPA ACT SECTION 6, Requiring written Acknowledgment within 20 Days, written clarification within 90 Days, equating Judgment Award, To Date Ignored even through Discovery Pretrial Questions.

E. Trustee charged Non-Mortgage Arrearage of $2,504.48 + $1.44.83 Interest Crediting San Antonio Federal Credit Union, Loan was Current, Timed with Attorney Quiting Case. $2,649.31 Due.

Total - @3B $2.085.00 + @3C $1,878.36 + @3E $2,649.31 = $6,621.67

@4A. Washington Mutual Attorney Questioned in Testimony at Appeal Hearing, my accounts accreditation of $660.00 Judgment, Disrespecting $1,000.00 Judgment with Question.
I Testified not $660.00, and the Judgment amount was unpaid, Just now Posted to Pay, without 24 Months Interest, from Judgment to Date. about $200.00 Due.

B. Washington Mutual Returned November, 2007 Core Mortgage Arrearages, in essence reversing Judgment, half of related Interest $955.01 Due.

C. Loan Originated Bank One N.A. / Loan Transferred to Homeside Lending / Homeside Lending F.A. was Bought/Acquired by Washington Mutual N.A. Washington Mutual Attorney Witnessed, Homeside Lending Manager/Lender/Supervisor at Trial.

Bank One Receives Payment and Bills following Month with One Detachable Coupon for the next Months Payment with Statement. All Bank One Payments made, included Months Coupon.

First; Bank One Credited December, 2001Payment.

Second; Bank One Suspended the Funds from Principal and Escrow.

Third; Bank One Placed Suspended Funds to Principal only.

Forth; Bank One Posted, Account Report, Stating Payments had been and are $100.00 more than actuality.

Fifth; Bank One Transferred Loan to Homeside Lending.
Washington Mutual called-it December 2001 was Curtailed by Bank One. Documented and Evidenced, but argued in Court that it was a Concealed Prepayment {a Misnomer} not Principal Curtailment.

Sixth; Washington Mutual called November 2001 Escrow Mismanagement by Homeside Lending, Admitted, Documented and Evidenced, but argued in Court that it was a Concealed Prepayment {a Misnomer} not Escrow Curtailment.

Seventh; Homeside Lending requested November Payment, informed December was Paid in Full, Homeside Lending reported Account was being Investigated.

Eight; Homeside Lending Requested/Received Check Payment Front and Back Photocopy.

Ninth; Homeside Lending Reduced Escrow and Applied Funds to Principal and credited Escrow Paid in November for November.
{Washington Mutual claims in November for December.}

Tenth; Homeside Lending Paid Loans Years Taxes Putting Escrow into Arrears then Returned Escrow Surplus Increasing Arrears.

Eleventh; Loan Statements and Twice Requested Loan History all "Blank" of December Payment, not owed/due/paid, resulting in False Credit Reports and 1098 Form Tax on Interest Report.

Twelfth; All Loan History Reports before and through Bankruptcy omitted Homeside Lending Payment History detailing first 28 Days, protecting Escrow Reduction Misapplication, including all Bank One Loan History Request.

Thirteenth; Washington Mutual Released Bankruptcy Stay then Loan Payment History on same Day, receiving Bank One and coveted Homeside Lending first 28 Days Proof of Principal and Escrow Misapplications admittance response Trial resulted.

Fourteenth; Misapplication admittance was excluded by "Common Practice" Defense by Homeside Lending, from the Stand in Testimony.

Fifteenth; Judge refused Appeal Ignoring Bankruptcy "RULE" claiming time expired, ENRON Judge Supported, FIFTH CIRCUIT Supported ENRON Judge.

ATTORNEYS
One; All the First Attorney actions stand abusive.

Two; Second Attorney benefited by assuming first Attorney's Caseload bulk timed with our Contract.

Third; Attorney Immediately Drafted Loan History Request using REQUIRED DISCLOSURE PER RESPA ACT Section 6 "qualified written request" no reply, ever, Sent "Certified Mail" not allowed admitted into evidence, to Date Substance Ignored.

Forth; I Drafted from Attorney's "qualified written request" revised "Qualified Written Request" sent "Certified Mail" admitted into Evidence, allowing $1,000.00 Damage Award for being Ignored, only, Merit of Substance of Questions Unanswered today.

Fifth; Attorney received Damage award, through Appeal Washington Mutual Suspended Payment, Attorney remained Attorney of record awaiting Award Payment only.

Sixth; Judge ruled Award Payments, 2008, I Demand 24 Months Interest from Judgment to Date, and awaiting.

Seventh; Appellate Attorney only argued "Excusable Neglect" assuming Two Days expired for Appeal, when Prescient setting Bankruptcy "RULE" extends time guideline, Ten Days were not received.

Eight; Case never was presented to printer for U.S. SUPREME COURT Revue, I stand Unrepresented, Squatting, with suggestion of filing Motion, Houston Bar Association Fails, Security Exchange Commission Fails, Judgment Fails, Comptroller of the Currency Fails, U.S Attorney General Fails, the indiscretion relates to Credit for Payments Made, Governed by International Substance permitting Commerce, beyond Civil Rights or Constitutionality.
JUDGE'S
Houston Core Adversary Judge {Famed} Ruled over Case that was by far the largest Bankruptcy Worldwide ever {Russia Oilfield Equipment.} My excused $1,565.14 Lost Payments, have never been return requested, Forced Bankruptcy Day-Rate Damages Are.
Time to Appeal was denied, Extended Appeal Time was excused overruling Bankruptcy "RULE."

Appellate Judge {Famed} Concluded ENRON Case just prior to My Appeal review, allowing My Appeal would Highlight flawed U.S. Attorney General Oversight of U.S. Bankruptcies and Trustee's.

FIFTH CIRCUIT was Appealed to Overrule ENRON Judge.

@5A. San Antonio Federal Credit Union Payment Book received revised with extended Terms relating, Additional Payment Amount Increased $1,878.36, Sent by Original Attorney as he exited Case, return required $1,878.36 Due. @3B
B. San Antonio Federal Credit Union Unsecured Claim of $2,504.48 + $144.83 Interest = $2,649.31 Due.

Total = @3B $1,878.36 + @3B $2,649.31 = $4,527.67 Due.

@6. Both' Bank One Payments, Admitted in Testimony Misdirect by Escrow Misapplications {Judge fails to Publish relative "Case Law" allowing "common practice" as defended to stand.} $1,633.44 - $68.28 the P.M.I. insurance = $1,565.14 + Interest from September, 2001 to Date, with forced Bankruptcy Damages at whatever Day rate Damages equates $1,565.14 and Day-Rate Damages Due.

@7A. First Attorney Accepted Case and Prevision of providing Loan History Payment Assistance Credit, accepting and retaining original Loan Documents, from Day one.

B. Original Bankruptcy Attorney was not Board Certified, he Stated that he Quit My Case, after additional Pre'Conformation Time Judge Suspended expired, Four Months Prior to Notice that he was Quiting all Houston, TX. Caseload, assumed San Antonio, TX. Move.

C. Letter received recommended Second Attorney Board Certified, that assumed bulk-load of Originals Attorneys Cases, followed recommendation.

D. Second Attorney's first Action was Drafting RESPA SECTION 6 "qualified written request" Dated February 12, 2001 Sent by Attorney "Certified Mail."

E. Receiving no response, Payments were halted for Court Appearance, {Release of Stay} Attorney's first no-show.

F. I Drafted and sent "Qualified Written Request" Trustee, All Lenders, Texas Bar Association, Comptroller of the Currency, Bush, U.S. Attorney General, B.B.B. and many more, requesting assistance with Ignored RESPA Request.

G. My RESPA Request was admitted into evidence but line Item response. Germain Questions remain coveted, now Protected as Judged.

H. Stay was released, equating My being a Squatter, I called Washington Mutual Requesting for the up-tee-nth-time Loan History, Received and both Lenders Misapplications Highlighted, Lender admitted Error's, Attorney backdated hearing request, with the Courts assistance.

I. Core Adversary Pretrial Hearing, Attorney no-show, assistant Attorney {never meet} stated acceptance of Case, Paperwork was not ready, Judge told Me about to dismiss, out of hand.

J. About 105 Days following Trial Judgment received by U.S. Mail,
Appeal required new Attorney and understandable arguments for Attorney to accept. Days later Attorney called stating Time was of up-most Importance for appeal, Less than Week was never expected.

K. Appellate Attorney Stuck with Excusable Neglect as Defense through the FIFTH CIRCUIT COURT, many Attorney Hours spent requesting Merit Defense on Phone, and In Office, final days for U.S. SUPREME COURT and Arguemen-ting the Unpaid RESPA Damage Award was Not-awarded presented as Case Summery, Case was without Case Merit review, Printer Time, Case Expired.

L. Washington Mutual Returned all Funds and half the Interest that forced Bankruptcy, but still Protects Insurance Lapses and backdated Loan Summery disputing Real time Loan Statements Received, Evidenced, Argued without Damage Award.

J. I Demand Credit Report revision/notation of Lender's Arrears returned, Bankruptcy cannot be reversed but Credit Report can Direct faults blame.

Richard Pollak
10:01am • #8

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
_dsc2398 Rainmaker_large

Matt Heaton

Bothell, WA

More about me…

Timu Corp - CEO, ActiveRain - Co-founder

Email Me

My ramblings about growing ActiveRain, the real estate industry and something I follow very closely, credit markets.  Why "The ActiveRain Addiction"?

My new project Timu, a communications and social networking platform for sports teams.

View my Timu Profile...

Big Startups

View my BigStartups Profile...



    Links

    Archives

    RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

    Find WA real estate agents and Bothell real estate on ActiveRain.