|
Find WA real estate agents and Bellevue real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
7 Comments on Why I have an Interest in Passing DNA Bills
I'm quite sure the liberals wouldn't claim me, however, this list can easily be expanded, once the barn door is open, to include many things that you might not want on it. The fact that it evidently HAS been expanded to include many things that it has simply proves my point.
In the case of conviction for violent crimes, absolutely take the DNA. However, I'm not best pleased that I have to give my fingerprint AND my social security number simply to get a driver's license in my state these days, we're about to have to get an FBI approved fingerprint in order to renew our real estate licenses, and the government promised, when the social security number was assigned to everyone, in the face of major objections to such an idea, that it would NEVER be allowed to be used for anything other than social security purposes, even by another government agency, never mind anyone outside of the government.
Do you see where I'm going with this? By the way, DNA upon arrest? Whatever happened to innocent until proven guilty? Are we going to let fear destroy everything that this country stands for?
Be careful what you wish for.
Hi Jonathan, thank you for the note. I think that would be a good first step.
Hi Tricia, Regarding the expansion of the list, the list is still being decided upon. I understand your fear of people having your social security number--that should be a concern. I am not concerned about someone taking my fingerprint--they took mine when I started to work at the FAA in my 20's. The DNA identification system does not have names tied to it. It only matches it's own DNA. The expansion of the list of qualifying offenses is adding serious crimes.
Regarding the second law to allow taking DNA upon arrest of certain crimes. As I said in my post, It has nothing to do with "innocent until proven guilty." The DNA sample is being taken to see if the arrestee has DNA on file in the CODIS database that ties them to any other serious crime.
Let's say you have a pet cat or dog (or as in a recent case a horse) that turned up having been torchered and there is DNA evidence that could tie someone to the crime. Then later the person that had actually committed the crime against your animal is arrested for something else. Would you not want that person identified as the one that hurt your animal. People that abuse animals do not do it just once--the same with rape, rapists usually do not do it just once.
If you look at the Katie's Law website, there is a link to case studies, you will see an example of Chester Turner (California) that was arrested for assault with a deadly weapon in 1987. He was not convicted. He was arrested a total of 21 times before he was ever formally convicted of a crime. In 2002 he was convicted of rape, his DNA was taken, and it was found to match twelve other unsolved rape and murder cases. The first of these victims was raped in March of 1987. DNA taken upon his first felony arrest could quite possibly have saved the next eleven lives."