It's legal corruption, but corruption none the less.

If the worker likes the client the landlord gets the rent.

If the worker dosen't kike the client the landlord gets nothing. 

The Ontario Works Act

Money paid to third party

18.A portion of basic financial assistance may be provided directly to a third party on behalf of a recipient if an amount is payable by a member of the benefit unit to the third party for costs relating to basic needs or shelter, as prescribed. 1997, c. 25, Sched. A, s. 18.

Decisions which may be appealed

26.(1)Any decision of an administrator affecting eligibility for or the amount of basic financial assistance, other than a decision referred to in subsection (2), may be appealed to the Tribunal.

Exceptions

(2)No appeal lies to the Tribunal with respect to the following matters:

4. A decision to provide a portion of basic financial assistance directly to a third party.

NOTICE AND INTERNAL REVIEW PROCESS

DIRECTIVE 33.0

Application of Policy

An internal review is an efficient, informal, administrative review of a decision to determine if the decision is appropriate.  The review is conducted in the local office after the applicant or participant has received notice of the decision and requested a review. See Directive 4.0: Application Process.

An internal review may be requested for any decision. A decision that cannot be appealed to the SBT can still be given an internal review. Any decisions affecting eligibility for or the amount of basic financial assistance may be appealed to the SBT with the exception of decisions regarding:

·        financial assistance given directly to third parties (e.g. direct payment of rent or utility costs);

                                              Media Release

                                          The Evidence Is In

                            Poverty's Smoke and Mirrors, Part 2

To see part 1 http://www.special-need-child-canada.com/povertys-smoke-and-mirrors.html

The article above went out to the main media and approximately 65 other print news media starting September 21 2008. It was also put on the World Wide Web. 

To my knowledge it was only printed in 3 Ontario news papers in the Letters to the Editor section.

1) Hamilton's, Mountain News

2) Hamilton's, Stoney Creek News

3) London's, The London Free Press

Thank you to these three papers for caring enough about people that live in poverty to print this article.

As of today November 06 2008 the Ontario government has only posted old outdated directives dated Sept 2001.

 http://www.mcss.gov.on.ca/mcss/english/pillars/social/directives/ow_policy_directives.html

Obviously these directives are of no use to anyone simply because of the fact they are outdated and the ministry is now using the July 2008 up to date directives but has not shared them with the public.

You may remember Welfare Legal was so offended by this abuse we offered $100.00 to anyone that could produce a copy of the latest Ontario Works directive 7.4.

As of this date no one has collected the $100.00. Welfare Legal now has a copy of the new directives that the government has not shared.

We take the position that this is the most serious kind of abuse by our government to implement new policies but not allow those most in need to have access to them. The only reason the government has given for this abuse is that the Ontario Government has not prepared a French version of these directives.

This is a Human Rights violation, among others, to implement a secrete version of the directives and not share them with the public and not to have a French version available.

As we have stated before the Ontario government has in fact been cutting the benefits of Ontario Works, (OW) and the Ontario Disability Support Program, (ODSP) recipients without letting the general public aware of these cuts.

The latest cuts that have become public are the cuts to benefits to grandparents that are caring for their own grandchildren, who many had, have been apprehended by the Children's Aid Society (CAS). The grand parent's complaints were heard loud and clear the government seems to have withdrawn these policy changes.

The new directive 7.4 and others shows more cuts that the public is not aware of yet.

One of these cuts shows that the Ontario government no longer supports volunteering here in Ontario. In the old outdated directives dated September 2001, the government used to give a small benefit to those recipients that had to do volunteer work as a condition of eligibility for OW. These cuts also affect those who wish to do volunteer work and are disabled on ODSP as well.

                                    Are volunteers no longer needed here in Ontario?

These cuts which are ongoing, have been made to help pay for the meager increases to OW and ODSP of 2%. They are also part of the government's bigger plan, to upload the cost of OW and ODSP from the municipality to the province and to pay for its poverty reduction strategy.

At the end of the day the government will save millions of dollars in benefits that the former Mike Harris Tories said people on OW and ODSP were entitled to. Does this make sense to anyone?

This story gets much, much worse. It turns out that the aboriginal community in Ontario had the foresight not to allow its members to be subjected to the policies and procedures put in place    by the Mike Harris government, when they bought the draconian computer program from Anderson Consulting now Accenture. The cost of that program was $400,000.00 and rising. This program was designed to cut people off of benefits automatically, with no human contact. There seems to be 2 classes of people being governed differently here, and what are the costs?

It would seem they were allowed to have their own computer program made up by a private company called AD Morrison.

http://www.admorrison.com/

A private professional researcher contacted Welfare Legal in an attempt to collect the $100.00 offered for the latest Ontario Works directive 7.4 and alerted us to a Pandora's Box. You will see on the home page of AD Morrison's site there is a link to "Latest Directives". This link contained a third set of OW directives that was not available to the general public.

After Welfare Legal contacted the ministry to see if this in fact was the latest and new directive 7.4, the ministry contacted us with a reply that had nothing to do with our request. Then out of the blue this link was taken of the site.

After gathering all the evidence we soon learned that the Ontario government had not been keeping these new directive from the public since July 2008, they had in fact been hiding them starting in December 2005 and no one new about it. At least no one that has come forward so far.

There has been no response from any legal clinic or private paralegal in Ontario showing that they new about this breach of the Human Rights Code by our provincial government. If anyone was aware of this why didn't they take it to the media? Does nobody care about this abuse? Does nobody care about eliminating poverty?

It is interesting to note that the government has even changed the directive numbers to confuse us even more once we were allowed to become aware of them.

September 2001 shows directive 31.0, the out dated benefits that we all are aware of.

December 2005 shows

7.3 is EMPLOYMENT AND PARTICIPATION BENEFITS

7.4 is COMMUNITY START UP AND MAINTENANCE BENEFIT

July 2008 shows

7.4 is EMPLOYMENT AND PARTICIPATION BENEFITS

7.5 is COMMUNITY START UP AND MAINTENANCE BENEFIT

For a copy of these directives

http://owcorruption.blogspot.com/

How can the Ontario government say it is attempting to alleviate poverty when it is secretly cutting the benefits of those most in need? (Reverse Robin Hood)

Ron Payne

Welfare Legal

Hamilton, Ontario

Phone 905-253-0205

E-mail welfarelegal2004@hotmail.com

Blog http://welfarelegal.blogspot.com/