|
Find CA real estate agents and Oakland real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
27 Comments on Neighbors from hell ---- MUST DISCLOSE!
You cannot control the neighbors, beside that, the next door neighbor can rent their house and the neighbors could change any minute, it is tough when you have bad neighbors. I don't know if you need to disclose that the neighbors are a pain.
Pacita - WOW!!! While I have seen and heard of that particular clause in the CA TDS, I have never heard of anyone suing for "neighbors from #%!!". I'm going to park for awhile to see if anyone else has. I'm really curious to see how something like that would play out in court.
On further thought, I have known someone who did sue their neighbor for harassment but they weren't homeowners but rather tenants in a large complex. If I remember correctly, one of the tenants even sued the property manager because they were part of the problem.
Tom --- when I do my Agent Visual Inspection, there is a section where I enter observations not just about the house itself, but the surroundings as well. I've noted observations such as hearing someone practice playing the drums next door. This kind of information may be pertinent and material fact as far as some people are concerned
Jon --- subjective can become factual depending on how the seller discloses it. For example, in this case, the seller could have said "next door neighbor has called the police 3 times in the last year to complain about ...."
Steve --- Since 1976, I've only had one neighbor from hell who was raising bull dogs and let their dogs and puppies poop in the enclosed area next to our townhouse. The smell was horrendous.
Chris --- my buyers did try that by accquiescing to the neighbor's demand to cut the tree on the property line, at their expense. They also got rid of other trees. Altogether, it cost them $3,000 in arborist charges. And they don't yell back. I told them the neighbor might be bi-polar.
Dick --- I've heard of a lot of horror stories about neighbors. One was even featured on TV about the Trial of John Kenney who killed his neighbor over a disputed boulder placed between their property lines. And this is in Carmel Valley. Talk about extremese!
John M. --- oh, neighbors from hell are there. Google it, and you'll see a lot of examples
Mary --- if this is considered material fact, shouldn't the seller disclose?
Donne --- if the problem persists, the buyers are considerering filing a lawsuit against the neighbor for harassment, and the seller for non-disclosure of material fact.
Good morning, Pacita....what a great point you make here.....if there's a situation that exists that would make a buyer change his/her mind about buying, it has to be disclosed....in this state that's a reason to sue.
Sounds as if the neighbor from hell liked the previous owner and is making the new owners life pure hell.
Probably her bridge playing buddies.
Barbara -- let's put it this way. The new owners are concerned enough to ask how much the sellers knew and when did they know it? They're looking for some relief
Cameron -- that neighbor needs a wakeup call. Maybe have the police called on her for a change, for harassment?
Pacita, what an unfortunate "mess" for your buyers'. I can't imagine anything worse than having a neighbor that is continually creating problems. Now, what are your buyers to do? Jump into the court system filing complaints with the police department, requiring a judge to figure it all out? I would move on.... If the buyers pursue any legal action, it would be against the former sellers for NOT disclosing, what they knew was a neighborhood "problem" and probably the reason that they moved!
This addition to the sellers disclosure is preposterous and stupid in my opinion. must have been trial lawyers that slipped this one in. people live on busy streets with traffic noise and it bothers some and not others. this neighbor is ridiculous, but so is this disclosur.Wow is all i can say. so sorry
This is a very interesting discussion. I'm not familiar with that disclosure and whether the former owners can be sued. What a nightmare for the new owners. Nothing like buying the house of your dreams and finding the people next door are crazy!
Hi Pacita - I have a rule I tell my sellers: If you have to wonder or ask if it should be disclosed, then disclose it. It saves litigation and headaches later.
Teri --- the sellers told us that they will "miss" their neighbors. Wonder if that was said tongue in cheek
Elizabeth --- guess you don't have the same disclosure requirements that we do in CA
Jill --- there are dangers that one may be subjective in one's disclosure. But there are also ways to disclose objectively. For example, in this case, if the neighbor had called the police on the previous owners, that probably should be disclosed.
Susan -- good rule!
Great post Pacita and something I've wondered also. But what about the police? They have nothing better to do than this? Must be a peaceful town. I know our police would maybe come out once, but not all these times. Sounds like the town needs a code compliance dept. where these complaints can be made and resolved.
I am thinking that the cost of the tree removal as well as the inconvenience of the police vistis merits at least a quick visit to an attorney regarding possible claim against the sellers.
Pacita, the disclosure is clear. The sellers obviously knew if they said, "just ignore her." How disappointing to move in a new home and have to deal with neighbors from #$%^. There are so many gray areas in our California disclosures. I have a question about a property I'm selling. Great post,
Now I have to look to see if NEIGHBORS are in our seller's disclosure here in Pennsylvania! Unbelievable.
This is a very interesting question Pacita! I've never had this situation come up and would think that it is so subjective it may be difficult to win in court.
Sandy -- Alameda is fairly peaceful and quiet, That's why we like it here.
Steven -- if there are any more episodes like these, the new owners may go ahead and consult an attorney for undue harassment by the neighbor, and then go after the previous owners for non-disclosure
Pamela -- The sellers may have known something but may not have known enough to disclose it.
Erica --- if you google neighbors from hell, you may find that this is a common problem
Sherri -- I'd be curious what it's like in other states
It sounds like this woman has a drinking, drug or mental disorder, or all three. I guess the new owners could have a talk with the police, and the police can talk with the nasty neighbor, about wasting their time and filing false reports, if she continues to make unfounded complaints.
Pacita - interesing situation. We do not, to the best of my knowledge, have anything even close to that in our agreements...but maybe, we should.
Login or register to leave a comment