|
Find CA real estate agents and Los Angeles real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
28 Comments on Why Use a Real Estate Agent When Buying a Los Angeles Home
Oh thanks Jane. And like I said I truly never plan to do it, but it has happened a few times. But I've certainly seen it done where one party or the other got the shaft.
Carla, LOL
Tammy, there you go.
Jane - dual agency is almost never used here in Tennessee, buyers are allowed to be unrepresented, but the agents duty is to the seller. I always notify unrepresented buyers that they should not tell me anything that they wouldn't say to the seller. You know little things like I want to offer $150k but I would go up to $160k. What do you think the seller will do when I tell them that?
Jane - I am so glad you addressed the dual agency issue, many buyers think that by going to the listing agent they will get a "deal". Larry did make an excellent point. When there is a dual agency, an agent has one foot on both sides of the line.
Larry, that is an excellent point.
Sharon, and you know which way they are leaning.
Don't get a home without an agent. It's the best money a Buyer will never spend. Great summary, Jane.
Wayne, I love it. The best money they will never spend.
Jane - Wayne said it perfectly. I do a lot of Dual Agency, Single Agent transactions because I bring the buyers to many of my listings (which is why I call it Fairfield County's Hidden Gem), but it requires me to educate both sides to the point where they can represent themselves. That's a lot of work and stress! I didn't realize that Buyer Agency Agreements weren't binding in your area. They are binding in my area and taken very seriously.
Gail, we do have a buyer agency disclosure as well as seller agency, we don't have a binding buyer broker agreement. And we have to disclose dual agency. But we are allowed to do dual agency, although some brokerages' policy is not to allow it.
Hi Jane, you explained it all very well, I've tried to do the same in other posts but I like your style. Buyers don't understand how simple their search will be when the decide to work with one agent and I think they still don't necessarily understand the MLS concept. We have seller agency, buyer agency and transaction brokerage in Colorado - transaction brokers can help both the buyer and the seller in a transaction without being an advocate for either....
Jane--I find it puzzling that so many still believe they will save mone if they deal directly with the listing agent. I had one buyer tell me that the commission is negotiable. I told him he was correct; it has been negotiated between the seller and my broker. What a buyer pays is also negotiated but it will be zero if I am compensated by the seller in the transaction. Too many informercials and bad real estate advice gurus out there I guess.
Jane, I am a big fan of the exclusive buyer agreement and strongly recommend that my agents use it. It is good for the agent AND for the client! The buyer can cancel if not happy and so can the agent. It is a relationship after all and I like to make it official :D
Mary, that's a new one, transaction brokerage. Thank you for the compliment, but I am sure you do very well at explaining the reasons to use a realtor to buy or rent. It just makes sense.
Teri, everyone is looking for a deal, yet sometimes they will end up paying more and being more stressed than if they had let someone handle everything for them. They can even save money that way.
Patty, in our neck of the woods it is extremely rare to have a buyer broker agreement. The buyers don't sit still long enough to sign them. :)
Nicely explained, Jane. We don't use Buyer-Broker agreements here in San Mateo County and Silicon Valley either. I've sometimes thought we should, but ultimately, the trust needs to be mutual to make a relationship work. Buyers NEED an agent working on THEIR behalf.
Lottie, I agree 100%. I don't think those agreements are natural. Forcing someone to be loyal is not going to work out and those contracts are not binding anyway.
Jane, it is the exception here too... but I still like it and recommend it to be used.
I especailly like the part about dual agency and getting a deal. People have many false impressions.
Patty, they are great if you can get them.
Melissa, they do. I think dual agency is scary.
I dislike it when buyers call the signs and already have a realtor! We try to educate buyers CALL me I can show you anything and yet they still go around calling agents on the sign.
If I get a call on my listing and the buyer wants to write an offer I become a dual agent which I also dislike...hard to not be bias in my opinion how can you service both clients yet we have agents making a living at both sides here in LA.
Marilyn, I really don't get it. I had someone call me on a listing she thought was mine (on my site) a $35K rental. Her agent was out of town. I wouldn't show her and I wouldn't give her the listing agent's no. I told her to contact her agent.....