Recently when I was commenting on a blog I noticed a previous Rainer had made a comment about "Walking on the moon" in a skeptical manner.

Our lunar presence has been questioned by scores of people as a farce.
A fairy tale if you will.
I vaguely remember a movie James Brolin starred in which was based on the theory that our moon landing was a creation of Hollywood.
Those of you who know me, know I am a firm believer in political conspiracy. I believe our government has concealed and covered up the truth about all the major (and minor) assassinations which took place in our country starting with JFK. I believe our government conceals facts which may give credence to alien visitations. Roswell comes to mind and Area 51.
- What I do not believe is that we concocted and perpetrated a farce over our successful moon landings. There were a total of 6 missions which resulted in moon landings. Apollo 11, 12, 14, 15, 16 and 17.
A successful conspiracy requires cooperation from the participants and anyone else who helped orchestrate the occurrence. Given the number of people who would have to be involved in 6 landings, secrecy over the last 42 years seems totally unrealistic. Imagine the number of best selling books and lectures tours this would glean, if a conspiracy actually took place.
Looking at the potential of being an instant millionaire - How long would you remain silent?
- I happened to see a brief article today which shows photos of the surface of the moon. The location is the landing site for one or more of the moon explorations which took place. The photos show the tracks left by the lunar vehicle the Astronauts used to explore the surface.
The photos were taken a few days ago by a craft/camera orbiting the moon. You can read the article and view the series of 3 photos here: MOON TRACKS
I certainly don't trust our government, but I do trust the integrity of the brave explorers who risked their lives to achieve our nations space goals.
Naysayers and believers are welcome to comment.
_______________________________________________________________________________________________________
15 Comments on Are Those Tire Tracks On The Moon I See?
I am not one of those who believe walking on the moon was a farce, still, you have a very convincing argument if I were a believer. Good job.
It's kind of sad that we are leaving our "footprint" on something as pristine as the moon. I agree with all of your points. I believe we landed on the moon, and I also believe in government cover up. Try reading The Gemstone papers sometime. It's a very fascinating read.
I believe we landed on the moon, that the Holocaust happened and that Katrina's hurricane winds caused the levees to fail in New Orleans.
Heck, our government can't keep anything secret! Idiots actually believe that the moon landings were faked and that 9/11 was a US government run or backed attack!
Jill: Thank you Too many people would have to abandon their integrity for this to have been a fairy tale
Debbie: Glad to see you agree. I will look up the Gemstone papers. Thank you
Wallace: I'm with you. Besides Katrina's winds I believe we were just plain under prepared. The nuclear reactor at Lake Anna was built to withstand a 6.2 earth quake. You all just experienced a 5.9. I'm not sure I would be comfortable living again in Fredericksburg just 25 miles away knowing that.
Than: The 9/11 thing continues to amaze me. It did take 100 years to finally reveal that Lincoln's assassination was not one lone madman, but a political conspiracy. I cannot fathom in 100 years we will find out that the "Secret Society" orchestrated 9/11.
Hello Bonnie and a wonderful post ... you and I think alike on many subjects and I also believe YES we did go to the moon ...
Your post has been featured at one of my favorite groups at AR ...
PARANORMAL STORIES & EXPERIENCES
Thank you Robert for the feature. I always enjoy sharing insight with you. I too believe we landed on the moon. I'm sorry to see our shuttle program end without anything innovative to replace it. I'm sure the moon has many more well hidden secrets yet to be discovered.
I would love to have you email me if you do enjoy the gemstone papers. Diane Haynes is a somewhat active member of this site, and she has those posted as a blog.
Hello Bonnie, your very welcome and you shall be receiving a email from me tomorrow!
VB ;o)
Bonnie, we were there because George Lucas did not have the wherewithall to produce a flawless epic like that in 1969. With today's technology who knows what we're really seeing. Bill Greer is another matter, of which friends are convinced he was implicit in the assassination of JFK.
Debbie : I will let you know
Bob: Thanks again
Kevin: I've done a little research on the JFK assassination. Have not run across the name Bill Greer. Enlighten me.
Ok Kevin, I'm back. Greer was the limo driver. I've read some of the theories about Greer. I dismissed them. I came across another site that explored the pros and cons of Greer.
http://www.jfklancer.com/greer.html
Connolly was upright and could have seen the movement if Greer turned around and fired. He would have also heard the muzzle report. When a gun goes off 2 feet from you - you not only hear it - you feel the percussion. Greer appears to turn around after the first shot. Not knowing what reaction Jackie had, she could have screamed or verbally drew his attention. I believe the film shows a reaction from her after the first shot and JKF grabs his throat.
Kennedy's entrance wound for the fatal shot was on his right side. The rear and left side of his head were blown off. The fatal shot came from the front and to his right. for every action there's reaction equal and opposite.
How about the bullet hole in the windshield of the limo? How did that get there?
In the follow up investigation the Assasination Committee held in the 1970's by Richard Sweicker I believe, the dictaphone belt and the Zagruder film proved there were 4 or more shots. Two reports were so close together they could not be discerned with the technology available in the 70's. So, possibly 5 shots were fired.
One person who admits to being involved was E. Howard Hunt. (Later one of the Plumbers in Watergate)
Only back to Kennedy, Bonnie? I think there was a major coverup when it came to Lincoln as well. There were too many other clandestine things happening around that act to NOT have covered it up.
I've visited the the SIXTH FLOOR MUSEUM. I'm certain I don't agree with the explanation given but it COULD have been plausible up until Lee Harvey Oswald was so easily taken out as well.
Ron 100 years later we found out that John Wilkes Booth was not a lone madman. Minor players at the time were prosecuted for assisting him. The real truth that it was orchestrated by the Secretary of State did not come out for 100 years.
Lee Harvey Oswald was easily taken out, and then Jack Ruby who took him out conveniently died without ever going to trial. How about all the mysterious deaths of the eye witnesses? The actuarial rates show that in the billions to one. 40 or more people who had eye witness testimony died before they could go before the Warren Commission.
Bonnie: I do believe in conspiracies, but like you - this was not one of them...