AR FL: At the opening moments his trial retired Canadian Duddy Do-Right, known lovingly by all as DD pleaded not guilty. 
DD’s attorney Mr. Tunnel Vision, Esquire ask for immediate dismissal sighting that DD was not speeding at the time of the incident. Tunnel explained that DD was extremely careful not to exceed the speed limit when taking his fare to home ownership. Tunnel’s opening statement went on to explain that DD was hired to transport his fare to home ownership, not to act as a body guard, he explained that DD was strictly a transportationnal driver. As a transportational driver DD had no liability indeed no responsibility to stay the course and remain on the straight and narrow. There for he stated DD was innocent!
After weeks of rationalizing and distracting the court, the court ruled. Judge Clear Vision Smith explained it was commendable that DD obeyed the speed limits, but he and his fare were guilty as charged of criminal conspiracy when they left the straight and narrow taking a short cut across the evil banker’s foot.
This fantasy, that only one law applies, that all that matters is getting from "a to z" is being suggested today in real estate. The idea has been suggested that if you can find away around one law (RESPA) you can commit fraud, because the offending document (a HUD-1) was not required by the law. The idea that lacking fiduciary you can disclaim conspiracy is pure fantasy! Worst of all are those who know better who are willing to rationalize away their common sense to short cut around problems, because the "victim" (In their eyes!) was an Augean Banker.
Rationalizing your use of a short cut is a Sirens’s call, a Jezebel! If you must and you should hear such things have your staff lash you to the mast, but first protect them pour wax in there ears.
What Do You Do When The Short Sale Lender Says "It can't be on the HUD".
Comments(4)