|
Find CT real estate agents and Fairfield real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
15 Comments on Connecticut Home Staging Story: Family Photos - Do Or Don't?
Let the stager do the job and remove personal items and photos, that's what a client is paying for!
I am 100% in agreement with you! Sometimes my clients don't take my advice but for the most part they have and understand it.
Yes -- remove those distracting personal photos. I think it's OK to have photos of cute dogs or cats ... but no people, please!
Hi Julia--I am glad you posted this from your original comments because I don't think it can be said enough. I think personal photos represent "TMI" and should not be on display when the property is on the market. I was in a property recently where the proud grandparents had a bunch of photos on shelves right as you walked past the foyer. Even though the children don't live there, the first thing prospective buyers would be drawn to was commenting on the cute children and missing the details of the built-ins the photos were on.
Julia, I know we are all in agreement on this topic....... put away the "people pictures and photos". Nothing else will make a buyer feel as if he is intruding into someone else's "space", as a bunch of people pictures everywhere.... especially those wedding portraits and school days photos.......people pictures in a room declares "we live here" and even if the sellers are not present at a showing, those photos give a "face" to the family that lives there (marking their territory kind of).....
Teri: That's a good one! "Marking their territory!"
Janet: Bingo! Buyers were missing an important feature of the house? Time for the photos to go!
Maureen: There are cute cats? JK!!! I probably wouldn't do that either...we could substitute a book or small plant...
Amen, Brice
Wendy: I am disappointed when folks don't follow my recommendations on this issue. They're usually the worst offenders - LOL
Julie - Wow - you give a perfect example here with your photos of this bedroom. Nothing more needs to be said. We're not sterilizing the home, we're just opening the home up to more potential buyers.
Much better....enough said. :)
Beverly - Beauty is in the eye of the beholder...or not!
Sally - The art piece they selected has the same graphic impact as their photo, just not the emotional one!
Thanks Shar!
Julia-
As a Realtor I do alot of staging and I never would have imagined the impact of the "family photo" (above)-----it actually was kind of creepy----I like the neutral landscaping picture, much nicer. You're right, it felt like an invasion of someone's privacy & that is not a good feeling for a Buyer.
Julia -- you make an excellent point of protecting the children in the family --- I'm sure this is a very effective way to get the message across to sellers who are parents.
Hi, Julia, Much Better, but how about getting rid of that burgundy wall color as well? Yikes, too much for me, and I suspect for most buyers.
I tend to agree with you. But then I see builders putting photos of real people in (probably better looking people than me) homes to help people envision how a family fits into the home.
Excellent Post. Taking the personal photos out helps alot. On the other side I see all sorts of "personal" photos when looking at staged builder homes. Why is that?