This has been a subject of much controversy for many years.  One could say it has been beaten into the ground.  Perhaps it is in the ground right next to where some heads are buried in the sand.

I don't know if you are aware, but there are numerous countries (Canada being one, France another) who have national health care, and are doing a wonderful job of making it work.  Now, I don't want to hear that you know someone who knows someone and they told them that the Canadian's HATE their healthcare plan!  I say that is total _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _!!  I have many relatives who reside in Canada. It has been my mission to talk to them about the level of healthcare they receive.  Guess what?  Yeah, you know what.  They LOVE it!  Sure there are those that grumble and gripe (even Canadians do that); but for the most part, they are all very thankful for it.  My cousin in Woodstock, Ontario just went through a very scary bout with Prostate Cancer, and he is nothing less than grateful for the wonderful care and attention his doctors have provided. 

I am not as familiar with the system in France, but I have been told that it is by far the most comprehensive on this planet.  So, with that being said, why would we try to reinvent the wheel?  Is it because it is France?  I don't know.  Whatever the reason, we need to just suck it up and find out what it is they are doing right! 

Approximately four years ago, I realized that our healthcare system was doing a very poor job in this country.  I joined a group called the Physicians for Health Care Program (PNHP http://www.pnhp.org/).  I would advise you to take a few moments to go this website and educate yourself as to what they are proposing.   This may not be THE answer, however, it is a starting point. 

It is my opinion (and we all have one), that it is imperative to take action on this matter sooner rather than later.  You can read all of the statistics.  They are not pretty.  However, they are only going to get worse.  In the past you could retire from your career with a pension and all your insurances in place.  Recently, we have witnessed the dissolution of many retirement healthcare plans.  These are people who have retired believing that they were going to be covered by the same healthcare benefits they had while working.  It is not something they were prepared for. 

This is only the tip of the iceberg!  Let me list some of the articles that you will find on the PNHP website:

  • 1.8 Million Veterans Lack Health Coverage - October 31, 2007

  • PNHP Experts who can speak on individual mandates for health insurance and the Clinton health plan -  September 20, 2007

  • Middle-Class Americans Join Ranks of Uninsured in 2006 as Private Coverage Shrinks - August 28, 2007

  • Study: Little Evidence that "Disease Management" Programs Control Health Costs - June 5, 2007

  • Michael Moore's "Sicko" to Premiere in Sacramento on June 12 with California Nurses Association and     Physicians for a National Health Program - June 1, 2007

  • Quality of Healthcare at Least as Good in Canada as in U.S. - May 1, 2007

  • High Deductible Plans Penalize Women, Middle-Aged Adults, Sick Children - April 2, 2007

  • Study shows U.S. residents are less healthy, less able to access health care than Canadians - May 31, 2007.

  • If you don't feel that this is an issue that needs to be brought to the forefront, then you have your head in the sand as well.  We the People need to stand up and hold our legislators and congressmen accountable!  It is imperative they realize just how crucial this matter is.  I, for one, am so tired of the lip-service we get.  When is this situation going to be taken seriously?  Of course, there are other issues weighing on this country right now, but ignoring all of them with empty promises doesn't serve any purpose.  We need to address them one by one, and our national healthcare issue is a great place to start.

     

     

    4 Comments on Our national healthcare...or lack of it!

    NOV
    02
    2007

    I have to disagree.  I do not believe Socialized medicine is going to be a step in the right direction.  Watering down the quality and standards of care and spreading it around to everyone through some government mandate in order to claim everyone is being cared for does not meet the true need.  Removing the incentive to research and develop new techniques and medicines by removing the profit incentive is unAmerican (sorry, not trying to be inflammatory but this country is great because of its economic philosophies).

    I like Rudy Giuliani's proposal to offer hefty tax deductions for individuals to be able to purchase their own insurance.  This allows for insuance costs to not be so crippling.  It soule relieve costs to business by having relief from paying hefty benefits.  COrporate profits improve, companies hire more workers, the economy gets a boost.

    I would go one step further and tax fuel consumption.  A hefty tax on fuels used in transportation could at some point reduce the countrys willingness to import.  This could influence the increase in domestic manufacturing.  Produce it local and transportation costs are less, create jobs, grow the economy.

    Bet you didnt expect that earful eh?

    11:37pm • #1
    NOV
    03
    2007
    1 Featured Post Hit Router

    I agree that our country has health care, and health insurance issues, but socialized health care is not the answer. Socialism always promotes laziness. It discourages innovation, and is easily taken advantage of. When people get things for little or no cost they don't care about anything or anyone but themselves. If its not going to cost you anything to go to the doctor, or to get medication are you going to go to the doctor only when you really need or any time you have a hint of a possibility of needing it? Now if everybody goes to the doctor for minute reasons, suddenly the doctors offices are going to be a lot more busy, and busy handling the small matters. Soon waiting lists arise as the supply of doctors cannot meet the demand of patients, even the though the majority of these appointments are probably not necessary. When an emergency or real problem arises, the patients that are really in need cannot get the help they need.  

    I lived in Canada for 2 years and not everybody loved the health care system, and nobody loved the tax costs they had to pay for it. 

    My brother worked for NASA and his fiance worked for another government research organization. They claim that the vast majority of government research workers/scientists are very lazy. They have their "projects" to do, but they have no urgency. They have no real motivation to get things done in a timely manner because they get paid by salary. There paid for working hours are only actually filled by a few productive working minutes a day. Why? It doesn't matter how many peoples lives they touch, how many innovative products they can create, because regardless of what happens their pay will be the same..... it If there is no relationship between work/sacrifice vs. reward it is hard to develop the motivation to work for something. Its part of human nature.

    Now compare this mentality to our business of Real Estate. Do we work to put in hours, or do we work to get results? We work for results, because putting in hours accomplishes nothing. Hours doesn't bring us a paycheck, only results. 

    Despite the theories of Michael Moore and others socialism is not the answer. What we really need is ways to support, encourage more free market health care. Hospitals, Doctors, who work and charge by the service. A system where the market and free enterprise are the primary driving sources, Where medical practitioners have a motivation to use business mentality and be innovative, where there monetary rewards are determined by their ability to produce.

    The natural market and free enterprise system is best.  Not socialism..

    I could go on and on, but I need to go to bed.

     

     

     

     

    12:06am • #2
    126,118 Points 5 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

    Referring to universal healthcare as "socialized medicine" is nothing more than name-calling.  The increasing numbers of those ineligible for coverage in the United States speaks poorly of the "economic philosophies" praised above.

    There are foreign countries with national health care that do great research, such as Israel (with a lower infant mortality rate than the US), Sweden, Germany and many others.  National health care has not degraded the quality of standards of health care in those countries at all. 

    It is un-American to deny health care to huge numbers of Americans in order to prop up the profits of private health insurers and drug companies.

    12:08am • #3
    164,805 Points Outside Blog
    As a Canadian I have a hard time understanding how one of the most powerful countries on earth can't provide universal health care for its citizens.  Overall Canada has an excellent health care system that is neither watered down nor lower quality.
    12:48am • #4

    Leave a response…



    (optional)
    What does the graphic say?
     
    Rainmaker_large

    Barbara Lamarand

    Pittsfield Township, MI

    More about me…

    My Persistent Assistant

    Office Phone: (734) 434-9904

    Cell Phone: (734) 845-1280

    Email Me



    Links

    Archives

    RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

    Find MI real estate agents and Pittsfield Township real estate on ActiveRain.