Pretty graphic title. I'm a little more in-your face than most pundits. Neither of those scenarios sound good, in fact, both are horrific. California's going to bleed...hell, it's bleeding already.
I wrote an article about the California Governor's brokered deal with loan servicers:
Is this measure politically motivated? You betchya. The Governator is taking care of his own, regardless of the inequities it levies on the rest of the country. The lenders are in a bind so they’ll appreciate this artificial market stabilization until the rest of the country catches up. This is Nixonian economics, plain and simple. THAT interventionist policy exacerbated rather than solved the problem of inflation.
What I’m about to say will be unpopular in the Golden State; housing prices are artificially inflated and need to come down meet rational economic models. Borrowers who make $90,000 annually can’t afford $700,000 homes. You can intervene in markets but the price of Amsterdam tulips will naturally gravitate towards its real economic value.
While I don't like the idea of reckless borrowers getting a free ride, Robert Kerr exposed the insidious nature of the lenders' motivation in this comment:
This CA proposal has to rank right up there with the most well-disguised scams of all time. The Governor is busy patting himself on the back, the press is fawning over the lenders’ benevolence …and the lenders are laughing all the way to the bank.
This isn’t a bailout, it’s Loan Sharking 101. When your borrower starts drowning under the vig, you cut back the vig, roll it over onto the principal and keep bleeding, at a slower rate.
Did Arnold’s advisors get this great idea from watching Richie Aprile run his shy on The Sopranos?
An upside-down borrower with a $400K mortgage on a $300K home isn’t helped with temporarily frozen payments. If the lenders really wanted to help, they would reappraise and write off some or all of the overvaluation.
Did he really just say that? He compared the loan servicers to organized crime? CONTINUED
I wrote something similar to this a month ago. It is a band-aid for a flesh wound. As I mentioned before, if we took the speculators out of the equation we would be experiencing what I believe would be "normal" foreclosure rates.
Lenn even mentioned that government intervention has helped this along by the fed softening up rates and handing out easy money post 9/11.
Interesting theory and I have tossed it around.