In order to figure out how to break away from the confines of our thinking, let's look at and understand some of the constraints of the current model for real estate video....particularly property video tours.

- Where To Start: (a.k.a "we're off to see the wizard"): Generally video involves an online journey by way of an online site other than your own to upload video. Your customers/clients/coworkers/blog buddies/etc. can upload videos someplace to bring them to you and you can do the same to upload videos for them to see.

Limiting Factors: (a.k.a. "if I only had a brain") There seem to be two chooses as far as production of real estate video - do it yourself or go professional. But, when someone uploads a video, they generally have all of the responsibility for ensuring that the video is properly edited, copyright is managed, etc.. It's likely that budget and trainup time continue to be some of the most impactful determining factors for the level of quality for video do-it-yourselfers.

- Multiple Uploads: (a.k.a. "and the little dog too!") Managing any kind of online content in the aggregate isnt easy. Much of today's model is based on the same video being uploaded to and floating around on 5-10 different servers. 

- Video Channels and Players: (a.k.a.  "lions and tigers and bears, oh my") Uploaded video generally takes any or all of three forms on today's video sites - video watchable on a channel or other page on the the upload site, video that must e downloaded, and a player that can be cut and pasted into a varying set of online locations."Channels" are the most common way to manage a number of online videos.  Your videos may easily end up residing on sites generally dominated by someone else's brand - the same may be true with the video player or downloads that the site provides. As a customer, I may have seen your branding somewhere in there but I sure know most of the online video brands. Portability and the ability to manage video content in volume apparently has its price and that hit to the brand is less expensive than being able to manage video content witin my own domain.

- Cut And Paste Video Distribution: (a.k.a. "I want to go home") Cut and paste code does a lot to confine our thinking about video.  With it, I can distribute videos to sites that I own or with whim I am close. Maybe some of my friends will cut and paste the code into their sites too. There is the MLS as well.  But can distribution really be called "distribution" if the customer has to do all of the marketing work?  In theory, I can place the videos anywhere - think about how things work in practice though.  More random thinking along this line: if this player's cut and paste code is public, couldn't anyone could post my video anywhere they want...even to someplace that I dont want them to.  Also, how will visitors know about new video content if they've never visited before and Google has the webpage on page 5 in a competetive market.

- User Experience:  (a.k.a. "ignore the man behind the curtain")The site says television or makes parallels to TV but is the experience really like television? I guess that we should neither worry about the pauses, hiccups, and buffering of the video nor worry about the small player screen.  It's video so it must be ok even if there is 30 seconds of buffering for a two minute video, right?

- Focus and Value Add: (I'm torn between "oh, but I am a good witch" and "I'll get you, my pretty") Who benefits most from your online video? Your provider, your videographer, you, your customers or it isnt clear?  Is a new feature on a flash video player going to help you sell your client's property - what is the measurement to know? Is the focus of your provider about driving traffic to their site or to yours?

Every day, more video sites, more video players, and more video channels - all with some mix of the above. Thinking..thinking...thinking....maybe a new approach might be needed.

In Part 2, we'll rethink the above model and, while we are at it, we'll give you some actual working code that demonstrates a completely different way to think about and manage online real estate video content.

Tony

 

 

 

 

 

11 Comments on Real Estate Video And The Wizard of Oz - Part 1

DEC
09
2007
What a wonderful and creative way to write a blog.  Thanks for the information.
6:23am • #1
368,556 Points 7 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router
An incredible analogy and informative blog.....I am impressed.....
6:45am • #2
This was a cute way to tie things together. I'm sure it will be a lot more memorable than simple rote memorization.
7:12am • #3

What factors exist that would cause a broker to locate a video tour of one of their properties on a site other than their own?

Distribution to multiple sites may not yield the viewership desired. It is important to cross-promote.

Brokers should be encouraged to flag homes with video tours on their flyers, newspaper ads, catalogs, and of course their websites.

And don't forget, the most effective means of getting potential buyers to look at a particular proporty is the good old yard sign. Brokers should have a way of indicating on or adjacent to their signs that this home is available as a video tour.

My goal as a producer will be to provide the broker versions of the video tour that are 2-3mb in size, so that they can be directly emailed to their targeted potential buyers. At minimum, the broker should have a nice HTML template for an email with a link to take them to the specific home tour on the broker's site. 

8:40am • #4

The emailable clip could be in the form of a teaser. Think movie trailer.

"If you want to see the rest of this home, including the dramatic vaulted great room, come see the full tour at......" 

8:43am • #5
8 Featured Posts

(sorry for the late response to comments...I actually wrote the post after working all night)

Dallas:  Thank you for the nice comment  :)

Julie: Thank you too!

Danielle: Hopefully what we'll have to try out will be memorable as well. :)

Mystery Person: email is still an effective medium especially among peple that have asked to be on the list. Pros and cons to emails with videos; 2-3MB may be a bit big for some but no different from a large PDF for others. Emailing to a specific client makes a lot of sense espacially when prefaced by "I'm going to send you a large file via email."  Thoughts?

9:12am • #6

Sorry 'bout the mystery. I can't figure out how to have my messages tagged with my info. LOL I guess that may undermine any tech advice you get from me!

I have always felt that emails should be extremely targeted. In other words, an email of a broker's latest video tour doesn't automatically go out to their list of 20 or 30 people. They should take the time to craft a personal message with the teaser attached.

The 2-3 mb is somewhat arbitrary.... you could pare it down, or even simply embed one or two still frames from the actual video to entice the recipient to view the full clip.

It's presumed that the broker-buyer relationship would be such that an unsolicited attachment would be acceptable. Buyers should be told that, "as my client, I like to utilize all the technology available to me... so if you don't mind, you may be getting emails with video and/or photography".

Video compression schemes are good enough that you can attach or embed a nice brief clip at minimal file size.

From: Marty Baggen OnQ Film

ps Any suggestions on how to make sure my info is tagged with my posts would be appreciated (maybe I'm not logged on? 

9:27am • #7
8 Featured Posts

Marty:  You were not logged in and so the name didnt appear.  Your points make sense. "so if you don't mind, you may be getting emails with video and/or photography" correctly sets expectations.

Tony

9:30am • #8

Thanks Tony...

Can you please PM me: marty@onqfilm.net

You and your team have done a really splendid job on your site and offerings and I had some questions and shoptalk if you don't mind? 

9:37am • #9
DEC
22
2007

Clever clever clever - I can see why video is so easy for you - you are a very talented person! When it comes easy it just seems like it is suppossed to be that way. That was a compliment not a detractor.

You would be very good at teaching this - in a SLOW, easy, nugget of info format, You will be hard pressed to hold back your enthusiasm and level of knowledge, but I think you could do it. Perhaps by putting out a video demo like Jeff Turner is sooo good at (as found in the Newbie Group) . Looking forward to more great posts from you, as I am sure many others are too.

At least I learn best when I have a model of something to copy and modify. That seems to teach the basics and let's me modify to what I want. Starting from just text of how to do something is like looking at a blank page where I am suppossed to write something. My initial creativity spark-plug is well, 'dulled' for lack of a better word to use.

BTW - I think you need to put a link to vidlisting.com under your bio in the LINKS section of the sidebar  ( I think you do that in settings?) so we can see more of your work.

8:17am • #11

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

A. Grey | Vidlisting.com| Real Estate Video Mentor

Bremerton, WA

More about me…

Vidlisting.com

Office Phone: (360) 362-1032

Email Me

The blog and thinkpad of a real estate video professional. Topics include property tours, software development, advice about technology, consulting, and discussion of conceptual topics. All videos produced by vidlisting.com are produced with professional narration in English, Spanish, and Portuguese.


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find WA real estate agents and Bremerton real estate on ActiveRain.