|
Find AZ real estate agents and Anthem real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
37 Comments on Buyer Inspection DOES NOT EQUAL Negotiations Round 2
I enjoyed reading your post. The pre listing inspection is fine but you can't get around home inspections no matter how hard you try. I certainly wouldn't count on a Home Inspector's Error and Ommission policy in the first place and I definitely wouldn't want to deal with it as a Listing Agent in the course of a transaction. I would rather test the motivation of the Buyer by offering them further inspection of a problem item with a reputable contractor. If they are serious about purchasing the property then they will but if they don't then let them withdraw. The Seller will then see the real need to make the repair in order to obtain the sale.
Our pre-listing inspection is for the benefit of the Seller - to give them critical information to avoid surprises during Buyer Inspection period. We ALWAYS encourage the Buyer to have their own independent inspections performed.
Do you disclose on the Seller Disclosure Form, EVERYTHING you learned at the pre-inspection? Could be detrimental to the seller to know too much before the buyer's inspection and before the home is listed.
Nice post... Re Williams's comment:
I recommend to my sellers that they conduct a pre-listing inspection. I sell them on the benefits of doing so and what it means to their bottom line. They pay for it and offer it to the buyer upon going under contract.
I don't know about all parts of the country but in CA the report belongs to the person who ordered it.. and that is where liability ends if inspector missed something.. so if buyer received or bought the report and there was something in error buyer would have no recourse against inspector... The buyer should definitely see the report but buyer should also complete his own inspection with his own inspector of choice... would hate to stand before the judge and tell him we gave or sold an inaccurate report to buyer and didn't have buyer get independent report... that sounds like lots of bucks from someone to a buyer..
Whoops... I cleared my computer cookies and didn't realize I wasn't logged in....
Nice post... Re Williams's comment:
I recommend to my sellers that they conduct a pre-listing inspection. I sell them on the benefits of doing so and what it means to their bottom line. They pay for it and offer it to the buyer upon going under contract.
I don't know about all parts of the country but in CA the report belongs to the person who ordered it.. and that is where liability ends if inspector missed something.. so if buyer received or bought the report and there was something in error buyer would have no recourse against inspector... The buyer should definitely see the report but buyer should also complete his own inspection with his own inspector of choice... would hate to stand before the judge and tell him we gave or sold an inaccurate report to buyer and didn't have buyer get independent report... that sounds like lots of bucks from someone to a buyer..
Kaye - The Seller would have recourse against the Inspector if they missed something on the pe-listing inspection.
The Buyer should always order their own inspections and rely on those for an requests for repairs.
The bottom line is that the Seller may be liable to the Buyer for undisclosed material defects - so why not get that off the "surprise" list?
Suzanne,
I agree that we need to get rid of as many items as possible from list and yes seller would have recourse against inspector.. my comment was directed toward William's comment about giving buyer report.. which is fine as long as buyer gets an additional report.. sometimes agents and sellers think they are doing the buyer a favor by giving them report as then buyer won't need to spend extra money for another report but that is never a good option.. and if buyer doesn't want another report I would have them sign a waiver stating that they know they are entitled to their own report and have chosen not to btain an additional report.