|
Find NC real estate agents and Cary real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
11 Comments on Pinterest? Attribution is NOT Permission.
I closed my C-21 office in 1998 and was recruited by Keller Williams in 2000. This business is a lot easier, and more profitable without agents to worry about. Agents promote first and think later,
Yes, you're right Mike and it's going to be a nightmare on Pinterest with the copyrights. Better to tread lightly. BTW love the photo, it's so crisp and clear.
Mike...
It's going to be a real problem for them, al a Napster. I'm in a quandary right now about how to deal with this website.
David,
I think an office without a copyright policy and indemnity is playing with fire. So many agents either don't get it, or think they will never be caught.
Carla,
Thanks!
Anyway, I think Pinterest has taken very deliberate steps to pin the blame on users.
The weakness, IMO, is the cavalier mention that linking to "the original source is always preferable." It is misleading to the ignorant and comforting to the deceitful.
Richard,
It will be worth watching.
Some people are just anti-copyright, and dissipating the protections incrementally over time may be the goal.
Mike, I'm on the fence with Pinterest. I guess it is a good thing I do not have time to Pin. If I do pin .... I will pin my own stuff and stay away from areas that may cause more issues that the photo was worth!
Kathleen,
I am on board with the pinning of my own stuff. It seems that the Pinterest model is deeply dependent on us pinning other folks' stuff, however...
I think I missed this. Getting ready for St. Pats. Did you see the NAR SOP may change to tell us we can't plaigarize or infringe on copyright? Imagine that. I wrote a post....
How are you feeling about Pinterest now?
Maureen,
I saw that NAR suggests members should not steal images and content. NCAR offers a prototype office policy manual, and I asked the attorney who heads that function if they addressed copyright. They don't and he thought it was a good idea.
A firm without a copyright policy and without indemnification from associates for copyright liability is taking on significant risk, I think. Suppose some schmuck swipes one of Lenn's maps, posts it on a site hosted on the firm's server, or a national firm's server.
How many entities could she sue for poor oversight and hosting stolen content?
I have done nothing with Pinterest. I struggle to get interested.
Pinterest is crawling with bots and marketeers now ... You can buy thousands of Re-Pins. What seemed like legit vendors a couple of weeks ago are now linking to funky sites with work offers to Re-Pin thousands of time.
Maureen,
There will be no end to it.
I was archiving local stuff on Scoop-It. I started out making some comment about the articles when I posted them.
And then I found I was just posting them without commentary, a combination of me rushing and their beta grade software.
"Fair use" came to mind, and mindlessly posting the content without commentary doesn't seem to meet the definition of Fair Use, so I stopped. I see Pinterest much the same, even to the point if getting spammed, as I now do from time to time from Scoop It members.
More Back to Basics, and less Next Shiny Thing comes to mind.
I signed up for Scoop-It but have never used it.
I see people take a photo and post it on Scoop It, Posterous or Tumblr and then Re-Pin it, giving their Scoop-It, Posterous or Tumblr a link and credit for the content, the creator of the content left far behind...
Login or register to leave a comment