As I said in my last blog, I'm new here to AR. 

Reading over some other posts, and comments left on my last blog, I find there is a lot of disinformation on why people are going crazy for blogs in respect to SEO. 

I've been in the SEO game since late 2001.  I'm involved in a lot of online SEO communities, and attend at least one SEM conference a year.  To explain why blogs have become so important, I need to give a little history on a few things.

It is known that the most effective SEO campaign is developed from off-site strategy, which can be summed up as getting back links from other websites.

4 to 5 years ago, any backlink was pretty much weighed the same.  People started picking up on this, and of course developed all kinds of schemes to get these links.  This is when Google started "tuning" their algorithims to account for this.

For instance, reciprocal links was one of the big strategies that was talked about.  Therefore everyone started doing reciprocal linking for the purpose of SEO. The reason why everyone was talking about reciprocal linking back then was because Google deemed them important. Reciprocal links started out so professionals could share clients.  A plumber in Tuscon may have links on his site for a carpenter in Tuscon and a electrician in Tuscon.  Google considered this to be objective information.  Now fastforward a year or so, and everyone and their brother is starting up reciprocal link exchanges with anyone who will particpate... FOR THE SOLE PURPOSE OF SEO!

 Google caught on to this, and changed the algorithim so that reciprocal links were not given as much weight as a "one way" link.  Why? Because Google realized people were now setting up reciprocal links that really didn't mean anything. So they figured that one way links should be given more weight because there was obvioulsy no collusion in regards to that type of link.  For a short while, that was a true statement.

Fastforward another year or so, and now you have all kinds of Link Farms, Link Co-Ops, Text Link brokers etc etc. These are all things that people use to get more one way links for the sole purpose of SEO.  Well Google caught on to that too.  Yet it has been difficult for them to design an algorithim that is smart enough to tell what is a genuine one way link from one that has been purchased or is part of a co-op etc.  So now they just give less consideration for one way links.

Now fastforward to the present!  The people at Google got the big idea that links which people put in blogs and comments of blogs should be considered more geniuine, than a link sitting on a footer of someones e-commerce website.  This is because blogs have such a human element to them. It is considered people sharing information with one another, whereas a link on a e-commerce website was put there by its owner (probably for the purpose of SEO) So as of now, LINKS ON BLOGS ARE GIVEN THE MOST WEIGHT

So now we are in the blogging craze. And just like the last methods, EVERYONE IS NOW DOING IT FOR SEO!  You have people setting up fake blogs with fake comments, or hijacking abandoned blogs to post their links on. 

My point is that SEO is always evolving, and while blogging is now the "recommendation" of "experts", don't believe it's going to stay that way. 

Blogs have many other important uses other than SEO, but the SEO part is all I was addressing. So I'm not telling you to abandon blogging, just don't count on it as the only strategy for a good SERP rank. I'm sure everyone has heard the saying "Don't put all your eggs in one basket"

 

10 Comments on The skinny on Blogging in relation to SEO

JAN
02
2007
110,664 Points 6 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Good post. I think the biggest thing to remember is to blog or write your article/website for your end user with as much content as possible. Too many people are looking for the next great 'seo trick' & some end up blacklisted when things change.
8:47pm • #1

Thats a good rule in general, even for regular webpages. Even though Google says thats what is most important for SEO... it's just not true.  If that were the case, there would be no such thing as "search engine spam". 

Also you have to be pretty blatant to get a site blacklisted.  Doing things like cloaking and sneaky redirects can get you banned pretty fast.  You cannot be "blacklisted" or penalized for any type of off site strategy.  If you could, then everyone would be setting up sites for the purpose of penalizing their competition right out of the index.

9:01pm • #2
JAN
03
2007
368,367 Points 62 Featured Posts Outside Blog
I have always wondered what the shelf-life of blogging would be.  Although it is useful, eventually, it would loose it's weight because it would be exploited.
5:56am • #3
In respects to SEO yes that is true. But the "shelf-life" is not determined by that alone. Blogging has so many other useful benefits.  As a general marketing piece, they are here to stay :) 
10:59am • #4
FEB
21
2007

Interesting Post, I also would like to know the Shelf live of a post? Once google index's the page will it stay for a Month or until the next dance or just disappear?

10:57pm • #5
FEB
28
2007

If the page is indexed, Google's algotrithim rated that the page was worth doing so.   The only reason it would be dropped is if the a new algorithim decides that is no longer the case.

 A good example would be forum pages.  I own a forum that used to have over 80k pages indexed by Google.  After the Big Daddy update, I barely have 1000 now.

8:31pm • #6
MAR
01
2007

Good post, I am well versed in SEO and have found that a blog is a great way for Google to revist your website.  It keeps your pages filled with new content and can work to your advantage in many different ways. 

9:31am • #7
120,789 Points 22 Featured Posts Outside Blog
There are a lot of valid points, both in the original post and also in the follow up. I think the blog needs to have a reason to exist apart from SEO concerns. As Google continually morphs what it's after, it's impossible to stay ahead of that curve - and sometimes even behind it. Doing a blog just for SEO is like getting married because you're pregnant - it doesn't mean the marriage will last.  Having a good web presence needs to be with the long-term vision in mind, even if there are daily adaptations required (just like in marriage). Blogs are a nice accessory to a web wardrobe but they can't make up for poor websites (like jewelry can't fix dirty clothes).
11:38am • #8
MAR
16
2007
Well said Mary.  Even though I've been at this for awhile, I will always be a student.  Understanding the dynamic aspect of SEO is important.
8:23pm • #9
JUN
02
2007
1 Featured Post

Though I agree with you on blogging is not the only answer.  Not everyone is doing it.  In my research i have not been able to find anyone other then myself who is blogging for the market I am targeting. At least in the top 100 positions in google I am the only one who has blog posts showing up.

 

2:00pm • #10

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

David Kyle, Charlotte SEO

Charlotte, NC

More about me…

Charlotte Internet Marketing SEM Adwords

Office Phone: (704) 494-7537

Cell Phone: (704) 497-1000

Email Me



Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find NC real estate agents and Charlotte real estate on ActiveRain.