I'm a Realtor here in Charlotte, and I was really suprised to find out the CMLS policy on domain names that have an IDX feed.
The CMLS is carolinamls.com for Realtor access, and carolinahome.com for the public IDX. The policy states that Realtor's that are members of the system, MAY NOT have an idx feed on domains that have words like MLS, Multiple Listing, etc. This is so that people won't confuse it as the real MLS. Well that sort of makes sense from a VERY NARROW perspective.
The CMLS owned CharlotteMLS.com for some time and it used to be the public idx site before they turned it into carolinahome.com
I'm somewhat technically inclined, and I have a few scripts running 24/7 that keep an eye out for good domains that are expiring and are related to Charlotte Real Estate. So far I have acquired RealEstateCharlotte.com, RealEstateCharlotte.us, OwnCharlotte.com, CLTRealEstate.com, and last but not least CharlotteMLS.com
I was really suprised that the CMLS just let that one go. I mean for an organization that is supposed to be concerned with the integrity of the name, it would seem they would at least forward it to carolinahome.com.
So it turns out it was up for auction through Register.com. Long story short: I ended up winning the auction to the tune of $4500! The person who was bidding against me, lived in the UKRAINE! Now I don't know it for sure, but past experience tells me this: if you live in the Ukraine, and have $4500 United States Dollars to spend on a domain name called charlottemls.com... more than likely YOU ARE INVOLVED WITH INTERNET CRIME!!!!
I still felt good about the price I paid until I found out the policy I mentioned above. I couldn't believe this. I just saved the domain from some Russian gangster who was probably going to turn into some type of 'phishing' website (i.e. set up a site that says people can list their home on the MLS for 50$, just punch in your credit card details) and now I can't turn it into an IDX site like I wanted.
I was going to be very careful in disclosing that this was not the actual MLS, and that only a Realtor had access to the MLS. I was planning to explain what the IDX was, and how it should not be considered the actual MLS.
No Dice according to the CMLS board. So for now, I just have it set up as a SEO strategy for my main site, because it is an old domain with authority.
But how does this make sense? If I would have let the Russian gangster have it, it would be gone FOREVER! This guy could have turned it into whatever he pleased, and there would be nothing they could do about it. Do you think this guy would have had the "integrity of the MLS" in mind??
The only people that the CMLS board can prevent from using the domains are the Realtors who are a member of their system. These are the very people that the MLS is for. So it's not okay for me to have a site that "might confuse" the average person that this was the "real" MLS, but it's completley okay for some stranger to. I mean even if was just some national lead farming network, they could do all kinds of things that degraded the integrity of the term "MLS".
It seems to me that the way to preserve the integrity, would be to allow Realtors to buy these domains up. The board should have some standard guideline on what must be disclosed, etc, etc. The message that the board wants to get across the general public would be conveyed on a much broader spectrum, because it's all over the web on multiple sites.
I think what the board is trying to prevent has already happened anyways. Everyone is familiar with the term MLS, and every IDX website has a field for the user to put in a MLS NUMBER! Addressing this concern by putting restrictions on Realtor's is not the way to go about it. The public needs to be educated, and the only one who would be interested in doing that is a REALTOR!
The fear the board has is that everyone will think the MLS is a public thing, and that everyone should have free access to it. They fear that somehow this misconception will grow if Realtor's are allowed to have sites with MLS on it.
I think the fear is legit, but the solution is actually making the problem WORSE!!
As I have stated, the current policy is basically leaving these domains wide open for abuse by people that don't care about the MLS, Realtor's or the real estate industry in general. As people come across these bogus MLS sites, their perception of it could be negative. For instance, there are tons of lead farming websites that offer "Free MLS search" just input your name and email and you will get instant access. But when one does this, you are just taken to a page that tells you "someone will contact you". That person of course would be a Realtor that purchased the lead.
So now the consumer has been tricked, and are upset they didn't get what they were looking for. They associate that experience with the term MLS and how a Realtor called them when they didn't want to be contacted in the first place... all they wanted to do was a search. Stuff like this can degrade the "integrity" of the name MLS a lot worse than a licensed Realtor with an IDX feed.
And what can possibly happen with the way things are going now, is that the term MLS can become so stigmatized... that something else on the Internet comes along AND REPLACES IT!
But hey.. at least no one ever thought they could search it for free :P
I know that is an extreme speculation, but is it really that far off considering the situation and restrictions I have described? I don't think it is.
I am a dues paying member of the CMLS, therefore I am committed to it's integrity. I wish the CMLS board would realize that.
Well, I would really like to hear your opinions on this.
Hey David-
CMLS has many, many ridiculous rules. Like only allowing IDX feeds through the broker website and being restricted to one such feed...so I have to use the RE/MAX search IDX if I want the benefit of remax.com even though our tech guy had built a waaay better search. Alas. The internet providers and web techies laugh when i tell them who our MLS is. We're notorious.
As far as the IDX vs MLS stuff-it's part of the battle with the DOJ's argument that MLSs are a public utility. When agents and boards and brokers refer to their IDX sites as MLS searches (which they aren't-IDX only feeds certain fields through, full information is only available to members), it sounds like we're already allowing full access to certain people. And it's a nasty fight that is going to get worse before it gets better. MLS is NOT a public utility-it's shared information among brokers, and I for one don't want to be told that I HAVE to disseminate my sellers' information to just anyone with a computer. Sharing with other professionals is different.
JMHO> =)