|
Find CA real estate agents and Los Angeles real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
50 Comments on I May Not be The Listing Agent But I Can Certainly Help You
Jane - Great post. I get these calls all the time, and I always want to be upfront with the buyer and let them know I am not the listing agent. I have no idea why they think if they get the listing agent they are going to get a better deal, but you've done a great job of explaining of why a buyer should re-think this strategy!
Jane, I hope your blog gets read by many home buyers. This is very sound advice.
I have received many a call like this also, including just yesterday. He was actually calling about my listing, which was under contract but available for backup offers. When I asked him if he was working with a Realtor he said he preferred to call the listing agents directly. I asked him why and his response was that he did not have a good experience with a couple of agents, in that they were not responsive. Perhaps this is a common reason why some buyers try to work alone.
Endre, thank you. I will wave as I pass through B.H..
Debbie, there are actually car brokers. But I am not sure they are neutral or even represent the buyer.
Phil, thank you. I hadn't heard that term. I shall have to look it up.
Mike, I still think it is difficult to remain completely neutral in dual agency. You jusJt now the buyer is going to lose out.
Jackie, it wouldn't be that way with me either. And that is right. The agent is the one who is going to make out like a bandit, and possibly the seller. Definitely not the buyer.
Bill, excellent explanation, as always. We have dual agency also, but honestly, how can the buyer think they are getting the best deal when they sit down and think who is paying the agent their commission. How hard can that agent fight for their interests.....
Rich, right. They see dollars. What the get are dollars going down the drain.
Michael, and in fact it can save them a lot more than by not using their own representation.
Gail, perfect example from someone who can attest to the fact that a buyer is better represented by their own agent.
Sandy, I really do think buyers don't understand the process. If they did our industry would be much more respected.
Ron, thank you for the reblog. Oh yes, that famous disclaimer which no one reads. When people call me I tell them I only wish that all the thousands of listings on my site were mine.
Lottie, thank you very much.
Adrian, thank you also.
Laura, thank you. I appreciate it.
Kevin, that is one reason buyers may want to go direct, bad experience with buyers' agents. Still they should continue until they find a good one.
I have to laugh when buyers think I have thousands of listings -LOL! Some seem surprised that they're not all mine. I've tried explaining the benefits of having an agent represent the buyer but it falls on many deaf ears. They don't realise that instead of saving money, they could be losing thousands of dollars without representation & a good negotiator on their side.
Judy, I know. It really bothers me to see how misinformed they are.
Jane - I think there is a lot of misinformation that goes out here, and there are many who believe this is the only way to get the best deal.
Hi Jane, Your post is a winner! Thanks for sharing. You are not the only one who gets this types of phone calls. Our buyers need a lot of education on that topic. Have a great weekend!
Hello Jane, this is a great topic to educate buyers. In Colorado, we can be Transaction Brokers and work with both buyers and sellers in one transaction without being an advocate for either party... but if it's my listing, why would I cut the commission when I'm doing twice the work? Where do buyers get the idea that the agent's commission is their bargaining chip? A buyer's agent, representing them is a better bargain, since it's usually free.
Thanks Jane
Just dropped by to wish you a great Memorial Day and weekend.
Christine, that's right. A lot of misinformation.
Mayra, thank you. You too.
Mary, I think buyers think the listing agent will push harder for them since they are getting both sides of the deal. However, an honest agent needs to be picking the best offer, and they are bound to present all of them to a seller.
Now why didn't I think about writing a blog on this? ;-)
Technically, the seller doesn't pay the buyer agents. The listing brokerage does, at least here in my area. The sellers sign the listing contract and agree to pay the listing brokerage a percentage. The listing brokerage offers to compensate the buyer agents from their contracted listing commission with the sellers should the buyer agent bring the buyer. Many people think I get paid from the sellers. I do not. My commission is from the listing brokerage through a co-op fee split.
Your point is well taken that the buyer should have their own representation. They don't seem to GET IT that the listing agent is UNDER CONTRACT to represent the sellers. But, these "savvy" buyers get worked every time.
Carla, that is correct. Technically the Seller is paying the listing brokerage with the understanding that a certain percentage, usualy 50% go to the buyer's brokerage. And often the listing agent doesn't have control over negotiating a lower commission with the seller if they bring the buyer. And you are correct. The buyer generally is not getting any benefit from using the listing agent whatsoever.
Hi Jane - Right. We have to keep reminding consumers that they don't have to work only with the listing agent, and in most cases it's better for them if they don't. Holding an open house one day for another agent, I had a couple come in who groaned at everything they saw. It was a beautiful home and I finally asked them what was wrong. They said they had wanted to buy it a few years before, but they called and called the number on the sign to try to get an appointment to see the inside, but never got a return call so they ended up buying something else.
It never occurred to them that they didn't need to deal with the listing agent and they lost the house to someone else, who was now selling it. They were groaning because it could have been their home, but now they couldn't buy it because they had too much invested in their second choice home. I explained that they could have called any realtor to help them and I was sorry they hadn't realized that. So sad.
Susan, that really is sad. I guess we don't realize that people don't understand how this business works.
Jane, there's so many misperceptions about the real estate business. You really spelled out why it's a good idea to use a buyer's agent - REPRESENTATION!!!
Juli, exactly right.
Jane, beyond excellent explanation about why buyers need their own advocate. Like you, I get the same type of inquiries from buyers who think they will get a deal. I now ask them if they saw a youtube vid or TV show or attending a "how to get rich" seminar for this strategy. In most cases, it was an online story by the network media. We just need to keep telling the story over and over again. So I'm going to pass it forward again with a BIG tweet!
Emily, thank you. We do need to get this message out, especially for the protection of the innocent public.
So many consumers do not understand the inner workings of a real estate transaction and how commission is split is one of the most misunderstood aspects of real estate. I guess we need to explain it more often and better--you did a great job!
Norma, thank you very much.