|
Find CA real estate agents and Murrieta real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
13 Comments on Obama & Econ 101
Gubment does not create jobs. Continually removing money from the private sector, through regulation, taxation, laws and harassment, and shifting it to grow the public sector, will not create jobs.
People with money and a reason to hire create jobs.
Romney is not the answer. Three things just off the top of my head:
1. He subscribes to the same Keynesian economic theory that Obama (and all other presidents before him) subscribe too. I just saw Paul Krugman on the Bill Maher show saying that the stimulus was not enough and we should act like we are preparing for an alien invasion to turn the economy around. Really? The broken window fallacy??
2. Running a government is different than running a for profit corporation. Government, whether it is be local, state or federal, provides a good or service and is a drain to the people for the benefit of all, or a segment of the population. A for profit corporation creates a good and service while maximizing profits. For example, a private school and a public school run on two different models with two different outcomes.
3. I don't believe simply getting government out of the way will make multi-national companies hire or create jobs in America. We simply cannot compete on a global scale. Even if we get rid of the EPA and all taxes, I doubt Apple will assemble iPhones in the US as the cost to manufacture them in China is $8, mostly due to lowered labor costs.
Honestly, I do not have the answers. I just know that Romney is not it. I would love to see a Ron Paul administration. At least, we would have a chance.
Just my 2 cents.
Gene, If you'll run, I'll vote for you! I don't have the answer to our economic mess, but I'd be willing to accept rolling back our government and regulations about 40 years and see if things didn't get better.
Good evening Gene. It has gotten to the point where we vote the lesser of the evils. Which one is going to hurt me less. I am not as much pro-Romney as I am anti-Obama. His health care crusade was not even remotely what he pitched to get elected. I am all for a change...in the White House.
If business is so bad why are we seeing record corporate profits? Why is the average CEO pay 250 times that of the average worker when just 30 years ago it was 25 times? Why has the Dow Jones doubled over the last 3 years? I could go on and on. It's the same old tune from 'the right'...cut taxes and deregulate. Didn't we do that during the Bush Administration...and where did that get us?
We need to get throught the election and then things may get better. Many entities out there that want this admin out and will do what they can to make that happen.
I am not saying it is right or wrong...but it is happening.
Actually, his first thought is to blame other people and never look at his policies. His second thought is "More government is need!"
There will be no magic pill with Romney. I know what I have with Obama, he has spent trillions, polarized our country, and will continue with no change what so ever. Romney may actually tone down spending. He has my vote.
Compared between the two, Romney will run circles around Obama.
Satar - while I agree that running the government is different than running a business, I would rather have a businessman give it a shot. The neighborhood organizer hasn't worked out that well. And no, just getting government out of the way will not resolve all the issues but it's a start. Like it or not we are part of a global economy now and if we can't be competitive with 3rd world countries in some areas of manufacturing or fabrication, we can at least define our niches where we excell. As more of our companies depend on their foreign commerce for larger chunks of their revenue it would be unrealistic to expect them to have all their admin, service and production domestically.
There is no magic pill. We're way past the magic pill stage. But I think that we need a change at the top as kind of a shock to the system. Too many people have given up on success and don't believe our current course is the right one. I hope they all come out election day. And we could use several changes in Congress as well. Unfortunately all the moderates are going or gone leaving only the most polarized in place and we see what that has done for us - nothing. Is there truly no middle ground left? Or are they just incapable of finding it?
Didn't we just have a "CEO President?" How'd that work out? That being said, I think Romney's performance as Governor of Massachusetts is a better indicator of his ability to be President than his time as CEO at Bain.
Touche, Gene, touche!
My father was a staunch conservative and voted straight line Republican until the day he died, now he votes Democrat.
Report him and get him off the voter roles, Virginia!
Login or register to leave a comment