|
Find OR real estate agents and Portland real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
7 Comments on "Trust But Verify"...Reagan...It's Your Responsibility Buyer's Agent!!
Hi Karen -- a buyers pre-approval is different then the information the listing agent is putting in the multiples. In our Sales Agreements the lender can only talk to the listing agent about non-personal/non-confidential matters.
I loved this post also. And you're right about having your own agent.....get the facts.
Hi Karen . . . I actually didn't [love the post]. But, hey . . . if anyone wants to put the burden on the buyers agents with the broad brush of "it's on you", this doesn't (IMHO) relieve the listing agents for being half-ass about data their entereing into the MLS. And here's a thought . . . if the listing agent is taking a stab at it, guessing or doesn't know then why are they even putting it in the multiples to begin with?
Carla...you're preaching to the choir! This underscores the need for real buyer representation. The burden should be on ALL agents regardless of which side they represent have a duty to make sure the information is truthful and accurate.
Great post to reblog and the intro is a post in itself. Buyer's Agents too lazy to verify what's in the listing are not really working in the best inrerests of their client. You can never take someone else's word for it.
Hi Christine . . . I agree. ALL agents need to be a little more professional with the accuracy of information.
Hey Chris Ann -- why are list agents putting in tripe? If they're not entering in accurate data, why put it in at all?!? Lazy is as lazy does.