I've been trying out the high dynamic range merge function in Photoshop. What it can do is quite impressive, and I think it probably is very accurate in terms of presenting what one sees when one stands at the camera. Here's my question....
In the past, I've used a different approach. I've exposed each region of the scene to the amount of light that I want it to be exposed. If I have an area in shadows that I WANT to bring up, I will up the exposure. If it's an area bathed in lots of light that I WANT visible, I'll reduce the exposure. Then, on the computer, I piece together these components to create what I consider to be an optimal marketing photograph. I like the results better than my HDR tests because while the HDR results are "accurate" they don't accentuate the parts that I want the way that I want them.
My conclusion: To use the HDR tool for the most effective marketing, it means that you have to have extensive lighting kits to properly illuminate everything EXACTLY as you want it. I'm not sure which task involves more work....spending the time to illuminate all the parts of the room exactly as you want so that you can then just use the HDR merge or taking the photo components and then spending the time on the computer to merge them together so that they look good.
If you have been working with HDR, I would appreciate your input.
Dumb question (as I haven't run any tests)...Is there any way to include parts of photos to the HDR process? I suppose I could include pieces of photos to enhance areas of the scene that I want enhanced. Anyone done that?
Margaret H.
Comments(10)