|
Find FL real estate agents and Daytona Beach real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
13 Comments on Yes Or No?
The no pet policy can surely kill a deal. Most of pet owners consider our pets family, and will never give them up. We'd rather look for some other place that will allow pets.
Luckily for us, California already has AB 860, signed into law in 2000 and effective Jan 2001. It states that: ’No governing documents shall prohibit an owner of a separate interest within a common interest development from keeping at least one pet within the common interest development subject to reasonable rules and regulations of the association."
Pacita - thanks for the comment. I just heard it a couple of days ago, and also, I think, Oregon is the same way. I really do not always understand the restrictivenes in the society, where, as you rightfully noted, people are very loyal to their pets (which is good).
We need to be a little more like California in this sense.
I dont know I am not a huge fan of seeing pets going everywhere. I mean seriously do you really need to take your dog or cat with you everywhere you go???
Lot of strick rules to adhere by. Buyers should find out the facts before buying so there are no surprises later.
Good clarification Jon. It is a very risky venture to assume that what is customary is the same as the rules and I don't think anyone would want to have to decide after the fact whether to give up their pet or move. Sounds like a liability issue to the agents who don't have the correct information in their listings too.
Pets are an issue here in our condos as well Jon. I guess we have more picky residents because I'm unaware of any buildings with a no pet policy in their by-laws allowing pets.
Hi Jon - We run into the conflict between covenant restrictions and practice frequently and it's usually a deal killer if our buyers have pets. I wouldn't get rid of my furry friends to live in a palace, and neither would any client I've ever had.
David - I was talking to a long-time firend from New York and I again invited her to visit us. New York to Daytona is pretty close, but she said she has a cat and does not feel good about leaving her alone, even if a neghbor would be coming to feed and check on her.
Our attachment to animals is more than loyalty to anything else in the world. I think it is simply a good biusiness practice to accomodate people with pets.
William - there are laws ... and there are ways to circumvent them.
Thanks for pointing it out. I shoudl have suspect it, though
Pamela - and they should be careful not to confuse the custome with the regulation.
Even if not a liability, it is plain awkward
Gabe - maybe because you do not have condo-hotels. We do not have confusion in condos, only in condo-hotels