|
Find CA real estate agents and Sacramento real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
12 Comments on Can a Seller Cancel a Short Sale After Lender Approval?
Hi Elizabeth - interesting topic when a short sale is involved. I represented a buyer on a short sale where the seller backed out on the day we were supposed to close. Buyers considered suing for seller failure to perform. In the end they chose to simply get their deposit back and move on as the seller was insolvent, and the home would likely be foreclosed on by the time it worked through the legal system. Think your approach is a good way to do business but buyers certainly have the right to pursue legal action. Regards Dave
Morning Elizabeth I also know of agents who will demand payment. In doing so I agree with you they are only hurting themselves. Enjoy the day
When a seller gets an approval letter, the seller can still back out because the seller may or may not agree to the terms of the approval letter. The short sale approval letter belongs to the seller and is not a mutual contingency. The contingency is not removed until the seller removes it.
However, let's assume that the buyer has legal recourse, as David points out, most sellers are "Judgement proof". ;)
I used to agree with your premise, Satar, until I learned it was not true. If the terms of the short sale approval letter match the terms in the offer, the seller has no legal right to refuse.
Moreover, if you are selling in California, the approval letter must be delivered to the buyer, providing the buyer and seller have signed a short sale addendum, and most sellers and buyers in California sign a short sale addendum. This does not apply to other states.
"I used to agree with your premise, Satar, until I learned it was not true. If the terms of the short sale approval letter match the terms in the offer, the seller has no legal right to refuse."
Somehow I can't understand the logic of this. So if the approval letter states some verbage about not waiving deficiency or states that the bank can pursue the debt or whatever, the seller has to agree? If the seller determines there are some legal or tax consequence because of the short sale approval letter, they can't back out? I even had a buyer that didn't want to sign the short sale approval's Arm's length affidavit because the buyer's agent and buyer have a relationship.
"Moreover, if you are selling in California, the approval letter must be delivered to the buyer, providing the buyer and seller have signed a short sale addendum, and most sellers and buyers in California sign a short sale addendum. This does not apply to other states."
You are absolutely correct in regards to the SSA. However, I do not find any value for my seller on the SSA. I will continue to use my own addendum. There were two instances where giving the seller's approval letter to the buyer resulted in a negative situation. From then on, I only send it to the title company and if the buyer wants to see it, I black out all the information not pertaining to the buyer.
I find tremendous value for the seller in the short sale addendum. It's the one real estate document that C.A.R. has devised that doesn't really favor the buyer; although each revision inches closer.
As for verbiage requiring deficiency, that is against the law in California.
Sellers cannot arbitrarily cancel an escrow when they have a legal and binding contract with the buyer. I have discussed this with lawyers and it comes down to the basics: Buyer and seller enter into a contract, subject to approval. Seller receives approval. Seller is required to perform. Especially when there is nothing adverse in the approval and it meets the terms of the contract, the seller has no argument.
But then there's the real world. Who's gonna sue a seller in this distressed situation?
"As for verbiage requiring deficiency, that is against the law in California."
I know we have deficiency as one of my clients was sued by Wellsfargo on a non purchase 2nd loan. We tried to settle the debt and lien, but they wouldn't budge and just released the lien while keeping the option of the debt. After the short sale, they tried to sue to go after the employment income. Client fought back and the case was dismissed and they settled with Wellsfargo.
"Especially when there is nothing adverse in the approval and it meets the terms of the contract, the seller has no argument."
I agree. If the approval letter states that they approve the transaction with no other requests (such as arm's length, flipping acknowledgement, right to collect debt, etc.) then I would think that is technically correct. However, if there are any verbage or additional requirements that reside outside of the confines of the transaction, I would think either party may cancel. Like I said, I had a buyer unwilling to sign the Arm's length affidavit. It was within his right as when the buyer and seller agreed to the purchase contract, there was no requirement for either party to sign any type of document like that.
"But then there's the real world. Who's gonna sue a seller in this distressed situation?"
That is so true.
I wonder what our obligations are once we get an approval. Do we need to communicate that to the buyer's agent? Or do we inform the seller and see what the seller wants us to do?
Hey Satar: If your client had a deficiency it was due to 2 things: the short sale closed prior to July 15, 2011, and the seller agreed to sign a short sale approval letter without verbiage releasing the seller from liability.
You ask what is the obligation once an approval is received? In the CAR short sale addendum, it says we must give the approval letter to the buyer within 3 days. I also have a written document signed by the seller, a seller advisory, that specifically instructs me to deliver the short sale approval letter to the buyer upon receipt. If you don't have either of those documents signed, then I don't know how you are supposed to handle it as that's not what I do.
"Hey Satar: If your client had a deficiency it was due to 2 things: the short sale closed prior to July 15, 2011, and the seller agreed to sign a short sale approval letter without verbiage releasing the seller from liability."
That is correct. Has things changed last year to prevent non-purchase seconds from going after the homeowner? I will look into this. Thanks again for the information.
Has things changed last year to prevent non-purchase seconds from going after the homeowner?
Absolutely, Satar. Where have you been? SB 458 added verbiage to Section 580e of the California Civil Code. Basically, it says if a lender agrees to grant a short sale in California, it doesn't matter whether the property is owner occupied or an investment, it doesn't matter whether the loan is a first, second or third; it doesn't matter whether the loan carries recourse or is non-recourse, that lender waives the right to a deficiency and must release the seller from liability.
Thanks again. I stepped away from the business to go and help my wife run hers. So I wasn't able to keep up. You are awesome!
Ok so what about canceling before bank approval? Should still be breach of contract?
Login or register to leave a comment