|
Find VA real estate agents and Leesburg real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
16 Comments on WHO OWNS YOUR HOME?? YOU DO!!! A Counterpoint!!
Lenn, I read the post and commented. I respected your comment greatly, as with a few others, who felt that the letter of the law was totally misrepresented by Richie. I didn't respect a few comments however....
I know people of my parents generation, including an aunt and uncle who NEVER used a credit card, NEVER took a loan out for anything other than a mortgage, would have been inclined to agree with Richie. Of course you are right, no argument there.
The concept of owning something outright by not owing any money on it, is something fewer and fewer people have, but it was prevelent at one time I do believe. Concept, not law, not fact.
(I took something very, very different away from the experience of reading the post... which was not what he intended I am sure.)
Hi Lenn, after reading your post, I went to see Richie's posting and responses. Quite interesting, but I am inclined to agree with you. I "own" my home, just not free and clear. The bank doesn't own my home, though they do have an interest in it as collateral for the loan I took out with them. Yes, like you, I own my home!
I am in agreement with you on this I own my home. Thats why its called homeownership, we are not renting the homes from the bank thats a whole different topic.
I'm grateful you wrote the counter to his earlier post.
Even if we owned our homes free and clear there would still be taxes---does that mean the tax man owns our houses? It can be taken by eminent domain---does that mean the jurisdition owns our houses? By ownership we have more of a vested interest than anyone else--but all kinds of crap can happen to that investment---sometimes good things happen---perhaps we sell it and make a lot of money. You can't do that with a rental.
Lenn, maybe if more people looked at home ownership like Richie we would have less people walking away from properties.
I agree with you and will have to see Richie's post. Interesting.
We are the temporary owners until the bank is paid, but then the state and county both remain due their taxes, so they become the temporary owners, unless we don't pay the taxes then our new permanent status is removed and the county/state become the owners until they sell the house to a new temporary owner until the bank is paid.
Andrea. Richie covered some diverse topics and that probably caused you, and me, to focus on one aspect.
Jon K. Agreed.
Kim. Thanks. I wasn't satisfied with merely commenting to Richie.
Charles. Agreed.
George. Disagree. If home owners didn't believe that they OWN THEIR HOME, I believe more would find walking away from that negative equity much harder. Walking away from a rental is easy. Walking away from home ownership is not.
Brenda. Thanks.
Jay. I'm confused.
;>)
Lenn, based on your response we do not disagree. I think were we disagree is how we are interpreting what Richie is saying. I agree that if home owners believe they own their home that less of them would walk away from their properties, but that ownership is dependent on them continuing to make their monthly payments. We seem to be at a point in time that some homeowners (Strategic Defaults) are treating that monthly payment as an option and not a commitment to repay what you owe, and end up walking away. That monthly payment is not an option, it is a commitment to repay, and the ownership is dependent on the homeowner (the person on the deed) making that payment. The Note is very clear about that.
George. The financial damage done to the American home owner and the American economy by the Wall Street Gangs, Capitol Hill and the White Houses in the past 7 years, causing millions to lose financial stability, their financial future was and is so severe that simple financial survival is often the only thing on the minds of many. The American home owner who is strangled by mortgage payments on a property with negative equity can only take so much.
How much is the American citizen supposed to pay and pay and pay when half the money paid is going into a black hole along with their lost home equity.
"commitment to repay what you owe" indeed.
The banks and Wall Street got what they want from their government cronies. How long will they continue milking the American Homeowner???
How many home owners with short sales and foreclosures, loss of credit and loss of dignity will it take to satisfy the financial industry???
"commitment to repay what you owe" indeed.
Why is it called "strategic default" only when it's a tax paying American home owner but it's called "rearrangement of debt" when it's a business???
"commitment to repay what you owe" indeed.
I have heard both sides of this arguement for many years.
If folks didn't feel they owned the property, where would the pride of ownership be? Folks would have walked away from a lot more homes.
I do own my home, and I am responsible for the debt associated with it. When the bank agrees to fix the roof, maintain the heating & air conditions systems, cut the grass and shovel the sidewalk we can discuss it further!
I love your comment Lenn.."Why is it called "strategic default" only when it's a tax paying American home owner but it's called "rearrangement of debt" when it's a business???"
Joe. Absolutely.
Laura. Thanks. IMO, the treatment of the U.S. home owner has been criminal.
What if you pay all cash for the home? No lender involved. Then it is definitely all yours for sure.
Debbie. There are those who claim that it's not ours because we owe taxes.
I thing they're all wet.
Login or register to leave a comment