Special offer

Moldy Ethics

By
Services for Real Estate Pros with HouseFront

By: Chris Brubaker

denver real estate

Moldy House
Photo Courtesy of shay coh

Aspergillus, Basidiospores, Chaetomiu, Curvularia, Stachybotrys and Torula. Six words you do not want to hear a home inspector rattle off as he’s going down a list of issues found with your newly purchased home.

This happened to two families in Greenville, South Carolina. When the mold was first discovered, the home was occupied by George Leventis’ family, who’s wife and two young daughters had become seriously ill from living in the mold infested home. The cost of removing the mold was so high the family was forced to flee the home and have the property foreclosed on.

The next family to move in were the Browns, who purchased the home out of foreclosure from the bank. The Browns would soon learn of the dark secret the home was hiding by finding a secret room with a note in it left by the Leventis family. The note read:

“Hello. If you’re reading this, then you found the secret room. I owned this house for a short while and it was discovered to have a serious mold problem. One that actually made my children very sick to the point that we had to move out.”

The Leventis were left with a tough decision; stay in the home and pay for mold removal (of which would cost more than the property is worth), or try to sell the home and move out, right after they had moved in. Both decisions seemed unfair, what would you do?

Well, the Leventis decided to sue Fannie Mae*, Century 21 Flynn & Youngblood, and Realtor Sue Bakx to get their money back from the home, claiming all parties knew about the mold problem and still sold the home without any regard. Sue Bakx’s Lawyer reports that the home was sold “as is” claiming responsibility of the homebuyer to have it inspected thoroughly (the family had the home inspected, but mold checks are not part of a routine inspection).

*Fannie Mae was dropped from the lawsuit after they bought back the home from the Leventis at the same price they paid.


Moral of the Story

Consumers

When looking into a home be sure and have all of your ducks in a row. Be wary of homes sold “as is”, do not let a “good deal” get in the way of a smart buy.

Real Estate Professionals

Most real estate professionals follow a code of ethics, the most popular being the National Association of Realtors Code of Ethics (seen here: Code of Ethics). Article 2 of this code states:

“A realtor must avoid exaggerations, and must not misrepresent or conceal pertinent facts regarding the property in a transaction. They are not required to discover hidden defects, to disclose confidential facts, or to advise on matters outside the scope of their real estate license.”

But within that same article it states:

“Realtors are obligated to discover and disclose adverse facts about a property which are reasonably apparent to someone with real estate expertise.”

If in fact Century 21 Flynn & Youngblood and Sue Bakx’s knew of the mold infestation, should they have disclosed this problem to the homebuyers, even if they were selling the home as is

For more information on mold in homes, check out the EPA’s guide to mold.

[Link to Story]

Home Value

Denver Real Estate

Karen Rice Keller Williams Real Est
Keller Williams Real Estate - Hawley, PA
Northeast PA & Lake Wallenpaupack Home Sales

How can anyone prove that the brokerage knew?  Were the sellers given a disclosure asking if they knew of any environmental issues with the house?  

Yes, it is your duty as a professional to disclose anything you know about the house.   It is also prudent to have a mold inspection when buying a house, ESPECIALLY if it is "As Is".   

Jan 15, 2008 11:50 AM
Stephen Joos & Chris Brubaker- HouseFront
HouseFront - Denver, CO

Karen ~ It's probably going to be a hard case to make that they actually knew about the problem.  And I'm not sure about the environmental disclosure.

But your right the consumer should have been more wary of the situation especially becuase it was an "as is" house, I guess they were to excited about getting a good deal on a foreclosure.

-Chris 

Jan 16, 2008 02:37 AM
Susan Haughton
Long and Foster REALTORS (703) 470-4545 - Alexandria, VA
Susan & Mindy Team...Honesty. Integrity. Results.

That's a tough situation all the way around.  I wonder how "secret" the secret room was and whether it was readily apparent to the agents? I would guess since the purchasers had a home inspection, any home inspector, while not specifically testing for mold, would have certainly noticed it and suggested checking it out.  So, it sounds to me as if the mold wasn't easily seen and the agents were probably not at fault. The bank is generally (at least in most states) not required to disclose anything, because in a foreclosure, they have no knowledge to disclose. 

Unfortunately, this sounds quite possibly like one of those impossible situations where no one was at fault although the buyers want someone to be;  the purchasers were lucky Fannie Mae bought the house back. At the end of the day, though, I wonder what people don't get about "if it sounds too good to be true, it probably is."  Excitement or not, consumers *really* need to be much more diligent in their due diligence. 

Interesting case.  Thanks for posting!

Jan 16, 2008 11:12 PM
Stephen Joos & Chris Brubaker- HouseFront
HouseFront - Denver, CO

Hey Susan ~ From the news article it says the "secret" room was located behind a book case, so I guess when moving in they didn't pay much attention and placed a book case right in front of the little door. 

Your completely right about being an impossible situation, they really are lucky Fannie Mae bought the house back as they could have just ignored the situation being the big corporation they are.  Consumers these days are always looking for someone to blame when things go wrong, even if they were actually at fault.

-Chris 

Jan 17, 2008 02:49 AM
Karen Rice Keller Williams Real Est
Keller Williams Real Estate - Hawley, PA
Northeast PA & Lake Wallenpaupack Home Sales

Caveat Emptor.

Let the buyer beware.

The buyer's agent should have suggested that they have thorough inspections done.  But that's the extent of her liability - there is just no way that they can prove that she KNEW about the mold problem.

The buyer really needs to take responsibility for the fact that they didn't have a mold inspection done... As for Fannie Mae, it was probably MUCH cheaper for them to just buy the house back than spend the money fighting it in court.  Lawyers are EXPENSIVE.  lol

Jan 17, 2008 03:29 AM
Stephen Joos & Chris Brubaker- HouseFront
HouseFront - Denver, CO

Nice Karen.  Caveat Emptor indeed.

The only way I would think they have any ground to stand on is if the previous family that was foreclosed on told someone why they moved out, and about the bad mold problem.  They would need to other family's statement to get anywhere in court.

Your probably right about Fannie Mae, they just said we dont need to deal with this and bought the home back.  

-Chris 

Jan 17, 2008 03:41 AM