|
Find CA real estate agents and Los Altos real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
31 Comments on What happens if home sellers offer too low a commission?
Bryan - I show all listings regardless of how much, or how little they pay. My commission isn't something my buyers need to worry about. If it's a possible fit for my buyers it always goes on their showing list!
Buyer agency agreements. The commission does not matter because my buyers are all made aware of the compensation prior to seeing any homes. If the commission is low then they pay the difference.
One thing s sellers should keep in mind, depending on the property, is how much might that agent have to pay a relo company as well. In high priced areas, it might be too easy for an agent to "steer" a client away from a low commission house. I don't do it, but I know of agents who have.
I really don't focus on the commission, unless it's just crazy low. Because like you said, it's not about the commission ... it's about making sure our clients get into the right home AND had a smooth transaction ~ BECAUSE that will bring you more business and referrals!
Well, I look at the co-op. I don't live in a cave.
If the co-op is less than the fee I'm charging my buyer client in our REPRESENTATION AGREEMENT, I'll know to include a credit from the seller to the buyer in the contract of sale and an agreement that the credit will be used by the buyer to pay their broker fee.
The only time this doesn't work is when the seller had little to no net proceeds to cover the credit.
Bottom line is, we are not a charity. If a seller doesn't have net proceeds to pay their listing agent sufficiently to cover our fee in the co-op, perhaps they can't sell.
Bryan, I personally do not look at the commission, it's more important to find the right home for my buyers. Sellers are entitled to ask for whatever they wish from their Realtors, it's really not their fault nor the buyers if the listing agent couldn't negotiate the commission. I've reduced my commission in the past where it would've been a short sale otherwise or they sold and purchased multiple properties using my services but always paid out the "normal" co-broke for my market to buyers agents.
What amazes me is that there is enough for everyone and the opportunities and amounts vary from time to time. When it is plentiful, then stuff yourself. When it is lean, be thankful and move on. Go with the flow is my approach most of the time. I have made killings and I have done favors....The balance should be respected
Hi everyone! Thanks for all the great comments. It's nice to see that we are on the same page about showing any property that benefits are buyers regardless of commission.
I had training for my agents this week and I uncovered a case where the buyer sued his agent because they found that two houses down from their home. .was sold as a FSBO for a lot less and HAD a finished basement to boot. . .at the same time when they purchased.
their argument was. .their agent did not show all the houses for sale. . and they felt cheated. . . agent was reprimanded and fined
This was the attorney;s case in my above comment. .
The attorney explained that since she was a buyer's agent, she had fiduciary duties to the buyers of "loyalty, obedience, disclosure, confidentiality, reasonable care, diligence, and accounting." Therefore, unless they agreed otherwise, the buyer's agent had an obligation to search out all available properties for her clients, including those not listed in the MLS.
The listing agent/broker is likely weak. Accepting low commissions is a sign of too few leads and poor closing skills.
Floyd Wickman has great scripts and recordings about why an agent might accept a low commission.
Weak salesmen (saleswomen) tend to have lots of excuses why the market is tough and why they don't make enough money.
Invest more in your marketing and sales skills and invest less in your excuses why you cannot get it done.
There is a reason most agents fail in this business.
What you accept is what you are worth.
You want more, be worth more.
It's all pretty simple.
Let someone else take the low priced listings.
Okay... here I go off the page.
There is nothing in our Code of Ethics that requires us to show every property to our clients, especially if the coop commission is lower than we are willing to accept. The Code of Ethics merely requires that we make our clients aware of everything on the market that fits their needs (or in other words, that we not "hide" this low-paying option from them).
We have options...
a) We can attempt to negotiate the co-op commission with the listing agent (although it cannot be a part of the contract, nor can we hold the contract hostage while awaiting their decision.
b) Have a buyer's agreement that requires our buyer to pay the difference
c) Let our buyer know about the property, and tell them that they'll have to make "other arrangments" (contact the listing agent?) to view the property... (effectively handing away the 1% that's being offered, and potentially alienating our client in the process).
Now... back on the page.... while I do notice the co-op fee, I don't show properties (or NOT show properties) based on that commission. I show my clients everything that's on the market that fits their needs regardless of commission... but not because of any requirement by the Code of Ethics.
I once showed a client a property that offered only $100.00 co-op fee. I even called the listing agent to determine if that was a typo... it was not.... I showed the property anyway, whilst holding my breath. Fortunately (for me) the client didn't like that property. whew!
I don't show homes based on the co-op commission. I don't even pay much attention to the co-op percentage until writing an offer. Then it's time to decide whether to request more from either the listing agent or buyer (who has already signed a buyer agreement).
Alan's comments above make a lot of sense. In California anyway, we cannot mention or alter the purchase contract on the issue of commissions. It has to be on a separate form. Thanks for your post, Bryan. I believe we will be seeing this more in the coming days.
Mmmmm. I'm not sure I was on the same page at all.
The best advice is to become a Buyer Broker & work diligently to be of help to the buyer. Thanks, Jim
Like the others I don't look at the offered split to show a home because like the others the buyer in my car has signed a BBA and my fee has already been set or there is no buyer in my car. If they offered a 10% co-op fee my buyer as part of my BBA would get a 7% rebate in that case. So the split is only an indicator of the agents and sellers mindset to me.
Lenn - Sorry for lumping you in on this. Yes, you do have a different perspective and a good one based on using a BBA to assure a certain income.
Alan - I really like your perspective and wisdom on this. Thanks for commenting. I do feel there are options in some of these situations.
I agree with Frank(#30), some agents don't admit it publicly.
I personally, feel it disrespectful if a listing agent keeps most of commissions( I've seen 4:2 or 3.5: 2.0). For me it is a red flag of greed. Do you really want to work with such agent?
Login or register to leave a comment