|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Find FL real estate agents and Destin real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2009 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
Hi Wendy - great question! Keep in mind it's not only about what buyer's will pay but also about where the home will appraise. The Appraisal Institute has a podcast regarding Green Building. They will also be offering seminars beginning this summer.
For me personally, I would pay more for the "green things" like energy efficiency, passive solar, renewable energy, no-VOC's, etc. Features that will make my house more healthy and more efficient. Also, I would require a builder that follows sustainable practices. These would be my most important requirements.
Let's pretend I went for the $450,000 house and it cost me 10% more to go green (high figure) bringing my grand total to $500,000 -- The 10% difference would cost me approx $285 more at today's rates (fixed, 30YR.) Could I make up at least $100 - 200 of this in energy savings? Likely. Maybe more, built efficiently enough. Also, because I choose a fixed rate mortgage I am not subject to inflation like I would be with utilities. Do you think this presentation and logic makes sense?