Ar_home_b_search
 

The President's 2009 fiscal budget would require the Federal Housing Administration to raise its mortgage insurance premiums. The annual premium would raise from .50% to .52%, and the upfront premium would raise from 1.5% to 1.95%.

FHA mortgage costsFor example, on a $200,000 FHA loan, the annual fee would increase from $83 to $87 per month. The upfront mortgage insurance premium, which is financed (added to the loan balance) would increase from $3000 to $3960. The total effect on your house payment in this case adds up to about $10 per month.

Mortgage insurance protects the note-holder for mortgages so that if the buyer defaults or enters foreclosure, the investor (the mortgage company) will get their money back. For FHA loans, a common loan for those with credit problems or minimum down payments to buy homes, the insurance is provided by the Federal Housing Adminsitration.

The Federal Housing Administration is under pressure because of 'deteriorating market conditions, as well as adverse loan performance.' In other words, more people are not making their house payments so the insurance has a lot of claims.

Congress is considering reforming the FHA so that mortgages will have 'risk-based' pricing. In other words, for people with more money down or better credit, the insurance would cost less. One more reason for buyers in Hemet, Temecula, Murietta, Riverside County and California to focus on saving money and improving their credit to make it in today's shifting real estate market.

Joey Aszterbaum is the Hemet Home Loan Guy and a member of the Active Rain social network of real estate professionals. To buy or refinance real estate in Hemet, Riverside County, California visit www.HemetHomeLoans.com or call 951.285.1012

 

28 Comments on Will FHA Loan Costs Increase Because of Foreclosures?

FEB
07
2008
I'm am very interested to see what reform happens to FHA at the end of this month
12:18pm • #1
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Clint: Thanks for visiting. I'm curious what will happen, too....higher loan limits? Stay safe out there in Tennessee. We're all praying for y'all.
12:32pm • #2

This reform is greatly needed. FHA should do away with down payment assistance programs and provide 100% loans instead. In addition, the borrower should have to attend money management classes with the emphasis on maintaining reserves for rainy days.

Realty Professionals, Inc.
Georgia New Homes
Atlanta, Georgia -- GA

12:32pm • #3
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Stephen: a class on maintaining reserves, huh? I know real estate professionals that need that class! Thanks for stopping by.
12:49pm • #4
Joey: managing credit requires education, disciple and a respect for credit by the borrower. All too often, however, borrowers don't see credit as a privilege but as a right. Education could possibly change that perspective.
1:52pm • #5
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Stephen: Great point. I know that with most first-time buyer programs out here a class is required, but not with FHA. They're counting on the mortgage loan officer to do the educating. Based on what you see on the news, how do you think we've been doing? BTW- the link in the last paragraph on improving their credit is meant for just that sort of thing. Thanks again.

2:13pm • #6

Joey: I am uncertain of what you're asking.

"Based on what you see on the news, how do you think we've been doing?"

4:41pm • #7
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Stephen: It was a joke. The majority of mortgage people just didn't do a good enough job educating their buyers...hence bad news about foreclosures, etc.
6:07pm • #8
649,189 Points 29 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master
Joey, very good information.  I did not realize they were looking at raising the premiums.  That is almost like a hidden raise as most people don't even think about that fee.  One of our first loans was an FHA loan; way back when.
8:59pm • #9
FEB
08
2008
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Marchel: It's the first loan for a lot of folks, like yourself. With prices increasing the way they are, they're not just the first loan...It's a lot easier to come up with a 5% down payment when the house is $80,000. When the house is $250,000, 5% is a lot more. You're right, most folks don't think about those fees. I was surprised when I crunched the numbers at the relatively small effect it will have on a person's monthly payment. Thanks for your comment
11:42am • #10
420,066 Points 71 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master
Nice work with detailing this info Joey.  The very point where the Industry got away from risk-based lending is when the writing was on the wall at a inevitable downturn.  Common sense & Risk based lending will ensure a return to a healthy industry from the financing perspective.  It will be interesting to see how all this plays out....staying tuned!
12:22pm • #11
197,385 Points Localism Sponsor
Lets all hope our "Congress" doesn't screw up the works. Its hard enough for low income clients to get loans as we all know.
12:32pm • #12
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Jason: Thanks, Jason. So how long do you think it will take for common sense and risk-based lending to help stabilize the market? Did you catch the 60 minutes 'article' on the housing market? Hmmm. I'm still a fan of sub-prime mortgages and stated income loans...some people just can't get in to a home without that sort of thing. There were just too many abuses (from consumers and the industry).

Richard: Sometimes the cure is worse than the disease, isn't it? My best loan program for low income folks ran out of funds (see recent blog posts). I'd love to see some good solutions. Maybe time is the only solution?

2:07pm • #13
420,066 Points 71 Featured Posts Outside Blog Called Shot Master
Didn't get catch the 60 minutes 'article' Joey.  I said months ago that I thought spring would be the start of things starting to stabilize, at least in my area.  And I agree, there is a place & need out there for sub-prime & stated income loans.
2:52pm • #14
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Jason: I'd say to stop by, because my brother TiVoed the article, but you're a bit far away. I'd love to say that things will stabilize in my area in the spring, but I really don't know. One guy on the 60 minutes clip said that he didn't think we were 40% through this..but he was in Stockton and real estate is local. Who knows.
5:15pm • #15
Solution: Have subprime borrowers agree to garnishment of wages to ensure payment. It should be a non-judicial process.
5:34pm • #16
1,546,324 Points 417 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

I knew it.  I knew it.  I knew it.  I just knew that now that they, FHA, Fannie and Freddie have screwed the market up totally, their solution is to raise the fees to the consumer.  Isn't that always their solution? 

Their neglect is what got us to where they are.  Yet, future home buyers are going to bail them out.  I can just see the bureaucrats patting themselves on the back for that one.  Just like the House and Senate did yesterday at that sickening love fest when they "magnanimously" gave some consumers a hand out. 

A pox on all their houses.

5:48pm • #17
649,189 Points 29 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master

Joey, Congrats on the feature.  When I commented before it had not received feature status yet.  Lenn's comment was right on.  Wow does she have a way with words.

 

6:14pm • #18
122,017 Points 6 Featured Posts Outside Blog
It's nice to see they are trying to advise a better system. It's only too bad that it is too late for everyone that's already in this mess.
9:08pm • #19
FEB
09
2008
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Stephen: What a truly radical concept. A little scary, but innovative.

Lenn: If you keep bottling up your feelings like this you just might explode. Tell us how you really feel. We're all friends here. ;) On a more serious note, I've been assuming that the mess we're in is a combo of consumer greed, overpriced houses and easy-money subprime lending. Maybe you can help me understand how FHA, Fannie and Freddie played a part in screwing up the market? I'd like more on that topic.

Marchel: Thanks. You're a big encouragement to me. I appreciate your friendship and comments.

Christy: Not too late. The low rates and the more flexible FHA and Conventional guidelines have combined to help me get many people out. Sure, not the ones who bought homes two years ago with 100% stated option ARMs, but many.

12:22am • #20
1,180,557 Points 134 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master
Hmmmm, I don't think $10 a month is too punitive but I am with Lenn.  The future homeowners should not be paying for the mistakes of their predecessors.
8:37am • #21
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Renee: Yeah, I was surprised that it made so little difference in the payment department on $200,000 (probably the average FHA loan about now in  the Hemet area).

Allow me to play devil's advocate for a second, but don't the future owners of anything always pay for the mistakes of their predecessors? If we saw a company in another industry, say cell phones, cars or pajamas, change their prices in order to compensate for losses they've been taking, would we be up in arms?

I guess the part of our job that is service-oriented, the fact that we help these folks with such an important part of their lives, makes us some kind of advocate-activists for homeowners. It's more emotional than selling cell phones, cars and pajamas. We love our buyers and want the best for them.

Great to be in this discussion with you all...quality comments.

11:50am • #22

Joey: In Georgia, foreclosures are non-judicial. The borrowers agrees to this at closing. Why couldn't this same concept be applied to garnishment of wages for non-payment of mortgages? While it is radical, it would certainly weed out those individuals who don't appreciate the credit that has been extended to them. The conundrum, however, is would borrowers agree to this? Should it apply to all borrowers, not just subprime? This idea would reduce the lenders risk while giving borrowers motivation to seek all means possible to pay back their debt.

I present this idea with all sincerity.

12:34pm • #23
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog

Stephen: Would buyers agree to it? If the recent rise in foreclosures shows us anything it's that some buyers will sign anything you put in front of them. But will legislators agree to it? Potential good side: people will think seriously before making the biggest financial decision of their lives, you'll weed out the jokers who can afford the payments but just don't like the idea of being upside down to go into default (uggg...that's awful behavior), and you'll save tax dollars etc...assuming there aren't more legal problems we're overlooking.

Yes, it should apply to all people not just sub-prime (what is subprime anyways? It's a fluid concept and I'd hate to have to legislate a fixed meaning). Potential downside...what about those (and there are many) who were lead astray by snake-tongued real estate professionals? This type of action could lead to financial disaster or ruin for them, and it takes time and money for a consumer to get some type of recourse for being taken advantage of.

No, I think that plan would mostly just benefit the large corporations that bundled these risky loans to sell to investors, the ratings agencies that said these were better investments than they were, and the loan officers who pull the wool over borrowers eyes for a quick buck.

It seems that often the cure is worse than the disease. There's a case for simply doing nothing. The market needs to correct itself. Bad investments need to be written off, mortgage companies that failed consumers need to go out of business, home prices need to go down. Life is seasonal...there is Spring and Summer and Winter and Fall. We just happen to be in Fall. I'm not sure legal or industry changes can do anything to stop that.

Other than give someone a slightly warmer jacket, so to speak. Thanks again for your great comments.

12:46pm • #24

Joey: You have made some very good points -- all of which need to be hammered out. In my personal opinion, borrowers would exercise a little more care and due diligence if you explained garnishments to them upfront in the mortgage process. As it stands now, borrowers just walk away from their responsibilities without discretion and pass the problem to the lenders. Borrowers don't feel that there are any implications; that needs to change. Would this concept eliminate all risk for lenders? No, but it would greatly reduce it.

Regarding unscrupulous mortgage brokers, it would be incumbent upon investors to better scrutinize how loans are originated. They need to be responsible for the loans that they purchase through better checks and balances. Investors can't simply assume that borrowers have met all guidelines. Investors should be more "hands on" with the loans that are purchased. By exercising such scrutiny, mortgage brokers would not be in a position to con borrowers and investors alike.

1:37pm • #25
FEB
11
2008
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Stephen: I think you're right about investors scrutinizing their loan packages. I know they have systems to 'audit' loans (check one for every so many), but it's my impression that they really don't check it out until something goes wrong with the loan...in other words, until the borrower stops performing. Then they scrutinize the file and find some way to sell it back to the originator. I'm fortunate to work for a good company with excellent underwriters. We haven't had to buy a single loan back because of originator negligence. That's virtually unheard of in the mortgage loan industry. Buying loans back is expensive and has put manby small brokers and broker 'warehouses' out of business in the downturn.
11:15am • #26
FEB
14
2008
This is an exciting time to be in our industry. We will become stronger...eventually.
2:28am • #27
FEB
15
2008
118,392 Points 9 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Milcar: Exciting, yes...lots of danger, lots of reward, lots of change. Stay strong!
12:09pm • #28

What does the graphic say?

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 

Joey Aszterbaum

Hemet, CA

More about me…

Jolynne Photography

Cell Phone: (951) 285-1012

Email Me

Retired from the Mortgage Business 6/09 Work for Jolynne Photography


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find CA real estate agents and Hemet real estate on ActiveRain.