Special offer

Whispers

By
Real Estate Agent with Integrity Real Estate

I posted this article on Title-opoly earler today and thought that it might be of interest to some.  Keep in mind, it's my personal opinion

Last week, First American announced the release of a new product named TitleSmart.

TitleSmart equips lenders with the ability to procure a title commitment within minutes at a refinance "point of sale". From the press release:

In initial testing, TitleSmart delivered a title qualification or title commitment - protected by full title insurance - in less than 1 minute on more than 63 percent of refinance loans in 44 states. Beta testing will begin this month with two top mortgage lenders, and several other lenders have integrated TitleSmart into their strategic plans for 2007.

As an industry, we have yet to evolve to a point where accurate title information is universally accessible without much effort or cost. Every abstractor knows that even the most innocent appearing "bring to date" can become a nightmare quickly.

First American has intentionally designed a product that will put untold numbers of title companies and abstractors out of business. How could anyone deny this fact or argue otherwise? Refinance business is an important source of income for most, if not all, title companies. The universe of business options for title agents is quickly approaching zero.  The previously anointed trinity of realtor, loan officer and title agent has been usurped by a new trinity of superior technology, title insurer and national lending source.

A company as large and intelligent as First American wouldn't have publicized an innovative product like TitleSmart without a full analysis of its capabilities and application, or lack thereof. Apparently, First American executives have decided to offset losses from questionable standards with profits from volume business. It reminds me of the automotive industry placing a calculated price on a human life.

Another interesting analogy is the accepted practice among title insurers of paying higher commission percentages based on volume alone. Why don't insurers negotiate "splits" from the perspective of an agent's claims history? A certain pattern of thinking among title insurers begins to emerge.

Perhaps, TitleSmart represents the natural order of things in a new economy derived from technology and transparent efficiency. Still, it's disturbing for me to realize that a trusted underwriter somehow used the policy income generated by agents to create the vehicle of demise for many agents.

Another excerpt from the press release:

It might even become difficult for some lenders to remain competitive without (TitleSmart) it.

The pioneering concepts underpinning TitleSmart are of no benefit to First American agents. The product is visible evidence of a corporate mentality intent on monopolistic control without concern for future premiums from title agents. It appears that quality title searches and competent examination skills offer a statistical "up-side" that's inferior to retail income potential.

There's more to this story for certain. Read between the lines and subtle whispers of future scenarios resonate. If the traditional approach to writing title policies has lost importance for First American, then it's safe to predict a trajectory path aimed directly at the purchase "point of sale" for TitleSmart or similar products. Why wouldn't this underwriter partner with lending sources to target organic services to realtors?  It's possible, but we need to extrapolate a step farther before attempting to answer.

See Pat Kitano's post, "Cyberhomes.com - a Title Insurance Company now has a Consumer - facing website with a 1999 - style name."

The (5) major title underwriters have quietly amassed a startling degree of financial and political influence, not to mention managerial talent. I suggest that TitleSmart is an insertion point for First American into retail markets that will expand in time to include the business of selling homes. In the past, we've seen real estate brokerages integrate vertically to capture the profits of settlement and title operations. What would keep a powerhouse like First American from opening direct real estate sales offices nationwide? Nothing, the market is lucrative enough to justify the effort and expense! When this occurs, First American will joint venture with large lenders to champion "consumer-centric" products and business models unlike any conceived before. Think about it, a company with the resources of First American could immediately re-invent multiple list systems and the primitive practices that have hampered the overall industry for generations. Change is happening quickly and the rate of change will only accelerate.

TitleSmart represents the inception of an evolutionary tract that will ultimately place title underwriters in direct contact with consumers at the retail "point of sale." (Fidelity National's product, Cyberhomes, is proof that other insurers are gently positioning for visibility.) Regrettably, scores of innocent and trusting title professionals will suffer as a result.

David Spencer
Keller Williams Northland - Kansas City, MO
Show Me real estate in Kansas City
NAR to date has been successful in keeping banks out of real estate. Keep sening your PAC dollars and we can defeat this threat, or don't complain.
Jan 24, 2007 12:05 PM
Ed Rybczynski
Integrity Real Estate - Havre de Grace, MD
Your Source for Local Real Estate
David, good point about NAR keeping banks out of real estate sales.  Regretably, the title industry doesn't have a powerful lobby and will most likely lose a lot of ground in the near future.
Jan 25, 2007 12:01 AM
Steve Dalton
219-465-8352 - Valparaiso, IN
Northwest Indiana Home Builder

Ok, I'll venture out a bit on a limb.  Why the anti-competitive slant?  Why keep anyone out of anything?

Competition will be the best for the consumer right?

I have dinner tonite with my title regional manager, I'm going to ask about this direct to consumer title possiblity. 

Jan 25, 2007 03:19 AM
Ed Rybczynski
Integrity Real Estate - Havre de Grace, MD
Your Source for Local Real Estate

Steve

I didn't mean to present my views in an anti-competive light.  I am completely in favor of competition and would welcome any change that benefits the consumer.  The change just happened more quickly than I expected.  I'm very "old school" and it's more then a little disheartening to learn that many of the practices I hold dear are now considered worthless by underwriters.  Two underwriters are active posturing for the public.  I suspect we'll see the others there soon.

Please get back to me with the input from your title guy and thanks for commenting.

Jan 25, 2007 03:55 AM
George Souto
George Souto NMLS #65149 FHA, CHFA, VA Mortgages - Middletown, CT
Your Connecticut Mortgage Expert

Ed, I have very little to do with dealing with Title Companies, but I don't know if I see this as much as an expansion of competition as I do as doing away with competition.  Like I said I don't know, but something just does not sound right about this new process.

Jan 25, 2007 06:55 AM
Ed Rybczynski
Integrity Real Estate - Havre de Grace, MD
Your Source for Local Real Estate
George, I posted this article in case anyone was following recent developments in the title industry.  I've been dealing with e-mails all day.  A couple of underwriters are making some very interesting moves right now.  The products are definitely anti-competitive.  The title and real estate industries have made the mistake of allowing (3) or (4) players to have control of information needed by everyone.  It's going to be interesting.
Jan 25, 2007 07:22 AM
Anonymous
Diane Cipa

I am very concerned about the impact automated search and examination will have on land records.  Please visit Radial Title Talk for more info and sign the petition. 

Whether or not TitleSmart is pro or anti competition isn't the important issue.  It's the serious impact on your inventory of real estate, the land records, I am concerned about.  Waiting until the errors turn into title claims and sink transactions into litigation isn't a good option.   Land records are slowly being scanned and the industry is slowly moving forward to electronic recordation.  The system is just not ready for what TitleSmart proposes to do. 

Jan 28, 2007 10:02 AM
#7