While reading the morning news release from the Nevada Association of Realtors, I noticed an article about the Mortgage Forgiveness Debt Relief Act of 2007.
There I also find a link to a story written by Teresa McKee, NVAR Legal Counsel, BROKER PRICE OPINIONS - CAUTION!!! http://www.nvar.org/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=140&func=fileinfo&id=200
Within the article, Ms McKee warns that "it may be interpreted as a violation of statute if the BPO is performed and the brokerage does not list or sell the property." Most realtors, I think, do BPOs as a way of getting listings. When we do a market analysis for a seller, we have no guarantee that we will get the listing.
In Nevada, you must be licensed to do appraisals, and apparently BPOs are considered appraisals, although is Broker Price Opinion is the key term here? The appraisal section of the Nevada Real Estate Division has recently released an informational bulletin which is different from the common understanding of many of us, including me, about what is allowed in regard to BPOs - Broker Price Opinions: http://www.red.state.nv.us/publications/bulletins/bpo.pdf
This article concludes that "real estate licensees should not perform BPOs for any purpose other than to assist a seller in determing a price to list a property." Otherwise they are in violation of NRS 645C, subject to a fine up to $5,000. Isn't a bank considered a potential seller?
No new laws have been enacted, however it does sound like the Nevada Real Estate Dept is ready to start enforcing some existing ones. Are other states going to follow suit? It will be interesting to see how this law is interpreted and enforced in Nevada and in states with similar laws.
If you are doing BPOs for most of your income in Nevada, please read these articles!
Interesting. I personally don't think that a BPO is worth my time, most banks only pay $50 to $75 for a very time consuming project. I think that the difference between a BPO and an appraisal is that a real estate agent can only provide an "opinion" of value and should provide a range of probable market value instead of an exact amount. What do you think the difference is?