Having an Unauthorized Inspection and Asking for a Repair as a Result
When Buyers and Sellers come to terms in a Northern Virginia real estate transaction, inspections and contingencies are among those items to which they are agreeing. In fact, our Northern Virginia Regional Sales Contract specifically address the access for these inspections by saying:
"Seller will provide the Broker, Purchaser, Inspectors representing Purchaser and representatives of lending institutions for Appraisal purposes reasonable access to the Property to comply with this Contract."
What if a Buyer decides they want more inspections than were agreed to between the parties? Do they have the right to have those inspections? If the words "to comply with this Contract" have any meaning, probably not.
A great example would be having a home inspection contingency in the contract, but not a radon inspection contingency. While the inspector is in the home, what's the big deal in testing for radon? Hmmm. Let's see. The Seller didn't agree to that test. So if it comes up that radon levels are elevated, that is on the Buyer. The Selelr would not be obligated to fix the issue. Furthermore, the Buyer may potentially create a disclosure issue for the Seller, based on a test the Seller did not agree to, if the Buyer does not move forward. It can turn into a really smelly kettle of fish.
In my experience, it is best to get any specific inspection a Buyer wants, agreed to by the Seller in writing. If they want a roof inspection, get it in writing. Radon test? Get it in writing. Make sure the inspectors are authorized to be on the property and provide the information requested.
Comments(51)