|
Find AK real estate agents and Fairbanks real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
46 Comments on The Audacity of... Race?!?
There should be no stats segregated by race, gender, religion. Government and Media fuels bigotry.
Parties are obsolete. Each candidate should run their own ticket.
Tchaka - We're on the same page with finding out why someone would say such drivel, but it would be a discovery that would have to happen rather quickly. It's not a journey of discovery that could occur over the course of 20 years... not that I believe for a second that the Obama family didn't fully understand and agree with the teachings/philosophy of Dr. Wright. I've seen the video's - the entire congregation was on their feet and thunderously applauding. To say the Obama family had no idea what his philosophy was, in my opinion, a bald faced lie aimed solely at saving his political backside. There's no way to sell that argument to most people - It would be equal to saying a member of the local KKK didn't really know what the klan was all about... he thought the sheets were just dress up and the burning crosses were a way to keep warm. To believe that requires us to suspend all intellectual thought and reason. It just does't wash.
Your friends who are anti-gay are entitled to their opinion... as we all are. The difference is those folks are probably not standing on the street corner or worse, a pulpit, shouting inflammatory anti-gay remarks. What if they were to stand on the street corner and preach a hatred of Asians, Mexicans, Poles, etc? There's a point where if you don't distance yourself from them, you endorse their attitude with your presence, which is exactly what this is about. The Obama family endorsed Dr. Wright's racist philosophy by not separating from the church and denouncing such bigotry. They didn't do that and that's a huge problem.
The Obama family's stripes are showing through loud and clear. The only folks who aren't seeing them are the folks who are only interested in advancing Barack's candidacy because they are looking to assuage their ancestral guilt or because they share the same racist philosophy. Either way, he is the last thing we need in the White House.
Nicholas- You can't attend a church for twenty years and now understand the tenets of the church philosophy. As I said above, to believe that requires that we suspend rational thought and reason. The Obama family knew perfectly well what Dr. Wright and Trinity United Church of Christ were/are all about. No one with a fully functional brain will ever believe otherwise. Some will vote for him despite that for various reasons but no one will ever believe he didn't know and isn't cut from the same cloth. I will sooner be called to Radio City Music Hall for a Rocket audition before that happens.
David- Understand we're not talking a difference in opinion about who makes the best car. We're talking about a racist philosophy that Dr. Wright spent 36+/- years preaching at Trinity United Church of Christ. Racism is racism - it's not exactly hard to spot. If you fail to reject that philosophy, as the Obama family have apparently done, then you endorse it - that's the very real and accurate meaning of guilt by association.
Ann - I agree... unfortunately I think the lesson they need to learn is one George Wallace and David Duke had to learn... racism has no place in society today. Those that seek to inject it will and should be ready for a hearty rebuke.
Jesse & Kathy Clifton:
This man's only attributes that comes close to being presidential is he is a liar.
Jesse and Kathy:
Congratulations!
This post has earned featured post status on the Silent Majority group in ActiveRain.
Bill - He is far from being honest with us about this affiliation with Trinity - today he admitted to being in the church when Dr. Wright made similar inflammatory remarks... this just has disaster written all over it. Thanks for the feature, btw.
Tchaka - Along with many other vices no doubt - who said I sanctioned cocaine use?
Come on Tchaka - You're a smart fellow - I've read some of your retorts to some other posts... explain to me how this association with Wright is any different than, say Trent Lott being ejected from Majority Leader because of a comment about Strom Thurmond?
J&K - That wasn't directed at you.
As for Wright, I will not comment on him until I know more about him (at this point in time I know close to nothing). My only caution to you and anyone else is that you be sure to check up on the guy and not rely on soundbites. That way you'll have a more clear idea of him.
Having said that, a fair comparison is if Trent Lott was ejected because of things Strom Thurmond was preaching.
Tchaka:
If Trent Lott went to Strom Thurmond's Church for twenty years you have a valid point.
Jesse and Kathy:
Thank you for your contribution to Silent Majority.
Yes, Obama sure stepped in it. Now, it won't come off his foot clean and he is slinging it all over. What a mess!
He had his chance to come out of this thing cleanly, but that involved telling the truth. He didn't do that. There was only one politician capable of lying to the American people again and again, being caught in the lies and still get elected. Obama is not that good of a liar yet. Unless, of course you decide it depends on what the definition of the word is, is.
Bill, as far as I'm concerned Lott went to Thurmond's 'church' for twice as long.
Either way, the example didn't match. It wasn't apples to apples. Sorry.
Tchaka - There is more to learn, I'll admit. With that said, what we do know is not exactly painting a pretty picture... The general consensus that Dr. Wrights comments were racist seem to be confirmed by his refusal to explain them or back away from them and Barack's refusal to distance himself from them.
The Lott/Thurmond vs. Obaam/Wright comparison isn't exactly apples to apples, but I don't know that I have an apples to applies comparison. My point was Lott lost his leadership position because of one off the cuff remark - should Barack be held to a different standard? I think not.
Bill - I'm just trying to call it as I see it. As I said earlier, it it walks like a duck.... it must be a duck or a really, really good liar. :) I agree that he had a chance to get past this mess this morning and failed, or more importantly, didn't try - just more faith and hope - let's move forward political drivel.
Tchaka:
What does Lott have to do with this post? Lott isn't running for president.
Bill - read Jesse & Kathy's posts, they're the ones who introduced Lott into this.
J&K - My understanding is that Barack refuses to distance himself from Wright, which is different from refusing to distance himself from any inflammatory comments. As for the part about Lott, I have two comments: 1) I don't know of an off the cuff remark Barack has said (I haven't followed him that tightly) and 2) I don't believe all off-the-cuff remarks are equal.
The reason I said earlier that it's important to find out the context of Wright's comments is because I've heard allegations made about people only to find out things were taken out of context. If Wright really does have racist comments, they should be condemned. Swinging this back to Barack, I do not believe he would stand by comments that are racist towards whites.
Looks like the Duck has been talking. Do you dare to listen?
"I have already condemned, in unequivocal terms, the statements of Reverend Wright that have caused such controversy. For some, nagging questions remain. Did I know him to be an occasionally fierce critic of American domestic and foreign policy? Of course. Did I ever hear him make remarks that could be considered controversial while I sat in church? Yes. Did I strongly disagree with many of his political views? Absolutely - just as I'm sure many of you have heard remarks from your pastors, priests, or rabbis with which you strongly disagreed."
Hear it yourself (if you dare): http://my.barackobama.com/page/content/hisownwords
David:
Obama has lied on this issue and he lied to the American people again today.
Tchaka:
Sorry, I didn't see that Jesse and Kathy brought Trent Lott into this.
I think Jesse and Kathy were trying to point out the double standard and the Democrats seeming to always get a free pass.
Tchaka - My point with bringing up Lott is that his one remark at a birthday party for Strom Thurmond - one off the cuff remark - caused such an uproar that he was forced to resign as Majority Leader. It isn't an apples to apples comparison to Barack/Wright but Barack seems to be getting a pass where others who wandered into the racist arena were quickly put out to pasture.
As for context - yes, certain comments can be taken misconstrued. I truly don't think that's the case here. Dr. Wright seems to be pretty clear in his message - If you read their website they are strong proponents of black liberation theology, which I confess I wasn't exactly fluent in... but even a cursory look at the basic tenets would seem to reveal a very racist, albeit reverse racist, mentality. This is the very antithesis of his unity message.
David - I did see that the "duck" has been talking - I watched the speech this morning but everything at this point is pure political posturing. He only removed Dr. Wright from his campaign after these videos/sermons came to public light and he's only making this speech now to quell a growing number of the electorate as to his true feelings. He spent 20 years at Trinity United and didn't see anything wrong with Dr. Wrights sermons in all that time... only when his political ambitions were threatened does he want to preach reconciliation and unity. I might have been born at night, but it was certainly not last night. Barack isn't the first politician to step in it, so to speak, and he's certainly not the first to doom his own campaign because of it.
The speech didn't address WHY he chose to align his family with Trinity for all those years... years he admittedly KNEW Dr. Wright was preaching controversial (i.e. racist) sermons. The "let's look forward, not back" approach is not going to work unless he explains WHY he stayed at Trinity United. That question has not been answered because he really can't answer it without alienating an entire segment of his supporters and would be supporters. Either he endorsed Dr. Wrights hate speech - and by being a member for 20 years that seems to be the case or he is too weak willed to confront Dr. Wright about it. If it's the former he is without a doubt unfit to lead this nation - if it's the latter, how is he going to deal with the worlds dictators? It's a lose/lose situation.
Jesse & Kathy,
Well I have to say you two certainly have your convictions! Speaking from own experience (and where better to speak from?) I have to say I choose to believe what Barack is telling us. I was born in the Humboldt Park Neighborhood in Chicago back in 1962 (same age as Barack) and as a child I bore witness to segregated buses, restaurants, and the racial divide from which he speaks. My Grandmother would not let me drink from certain water fountains in the park because they weren't for "white folks" no, they were for Blacks, Hispanics and oh yeah, birds to bathe in! My folks worked their way out of the neighborhood and into the suburbs (I suspect perhaps from fear of what they saw around them and their children) Although it was never said aloud. My parents would never tolerate racism or prejudice in the home in any way shape or form then or now, yet still I'd hear it a family gatherings, among friends growing up and when I entered the job market in the 80s. Geez, even now I find it in little snippets strategically placed through out the web. Does it need to end? Yes, it does. Will, I foster an environment to nurture that? Yes, I will. Can you put forth the same effort? Do you even want to? In case you think I am just another bleeding heart liberal, I can only say this. I've voted in EVERY (presidential & local) election since 1980. This is the 1st time I have not voted Republican. OK, so the cat's out the bag. I was raised Catholic and am now a practicing Episcopalian so I think I now a thing or two about some of the BS that comes out of the Church (anyones church) But hey, none of us are infallible. (Thank Christ). As for how Barack might deal with the worlds dicators? Perhaps a steady hand and thoughtful heart? I don't see a losing situation here, just an oppurtunity to make a real difference in my childrens' lives. Will we every agree? Maybe not today, but maybe one day! And when I think of my Fairbanks Real Real Estate referal source you will be first to come to mind. But please no talk of politics or religion. Deal?
Cheers,
David - First, I want to thank you for commenting and joining in on what I hoped would be a spirited, but civil discussion. (everyone else as well) I think we can both agree that racism has no place in the world today... it's a good idea to understand history but also to move past it to a better place. My family is from the deep old, south - Mississippi - and it sounds as though our parents shared a similar mentality toward racism... something I'm proud of.
As far as the speech today, I was taught by my father and I taught our children that words were meaningless next to actions. What you do says far about your character than what you say. Barack is saying today that he's beyond the issue of racial division, but his actions - his 20 years at Trinity United tell another story.
Btw, I don't know a soul in Antioch.... If we have someone relocating to you area, we'll certainly keep you in mind as well!