Special offer

Can My Lender Sue for Deficiency in a Foreclosure in California?

By
Real Estate Agent with Keller Williams World Class BRE# 01874717

Can My Lender Sue for Deficiency in a Foreclosure in California?

In California we have certain coveted rules under what conditions can my lender sue for deficiency in a foreclosure. Generally, a lender in California has 2 options in order to sue on the note against the real estate itself; it can go through a judicial foreclosure or a non-judicial foreclosure process.Can My Lender Sue for Deficiency in a Foreclosure in California?

The former involves a full court process, which takes a long period of time and expense, along with certain borrower redemption rights to pay and redeem the property back (3 months if the award satisfied the amount due or 1 year if it did not). But the benefit for the lender here is that it can recover any deficiency in the award to the amout due the lender personally against the borrower.

The later (non-judicial foreclosure), is vastly more chosen by lenders in California, which takes a much shorter period of time and expense, whereby the property is sold at a trustee sale and the proceeds are delivered to the lender to satisfy the outstanding obligations. The other largest difference, generally, here is that the lender cannot recover any deficiency against the borrower personally.

But, as you will read below, the difference between judicial and non-judicial foreclosure really does NOT give the lender in California a deficiency right.

 

Below is a summary ("cheat sheet") of the general rules and some additions to those rules, for the benefit of borrowers in foreclosure and short sale in California as of the date of this post:

  1. California has the One Action Rule, which states that there can be only one form of action against another to recover on any debt and any right secured by a loan upon real property.
  2. There is no deficiency judgment allowed by a lender following a non-judicial foreclosure.
  3. There is no deficiency judgment allowed by a lender when the loan is either a purchase money loan for an owner-occupied residential dwelling of 1 to 4 units OR seller carry-back financing.
  4. NEW RELIEF as of January 1, 2013:  There is no deficiency judgment allowed on a refinance of a purchase money loan for an owner-occupied residential dwelling of 1 to 4 units made on or after January 1, 2013 (except for any cash-out portion of that refinance) as long as such refinance is used to directly pay off the previous purchase money loan with costs, fees and expenses of the refinance.
  5. NEW RELIEF on Short Sales: There is no deficiency judgment allowed following a short sale for a residential dwelling of 1 to 4 units.
  6. NEW RELIEF on Short Sales: A lender cannot require a borrower to pay any money as a condition to approving the short sale, unless those funds come from the proceeds of the sale.Foreclosure in California
 
EXAMPLE
Now what happens if you have a second loan on your residential property of 1 to 4 units? It gets a bit more complicated but just apply the rules above to give you the answer.
 
Lets assume there is a first loan of $500,000 and a second loan of $100,000 on a residential property of 1 to 4 units in California. Lets also assume that both loans were purchase money loans for an owner-occupied residential property. The borrower does not pay on the first and second loan and the first lender decides to foreclosure by trustee sale in California (non-judicial foreclosure). First of all, being that the lender decided on a non-judifical foreclosure, there can be no deficiency judgment in its award on the first (Rule 1 - One Action Rule). However, what happens to the second loan that lets assume was not fully satisfied in the first lenders action (i.e. "Sold Out Second")? Since it did not foreclose, it still has not violated the One Action Rule so it technically can sue the borrower personally on the note, right? But, go now to Rule 3 above. If the second loan was either a purchase money loan or a seller carry-back, it cannot sue the borrower for any deficiency because it was a purchase money loan. If the second loan was a refinance loan that was used to pay off the previous purchase money loan with no cash out, then Rule 4 extends the protection of Rule 3, as long as the refinance took place on or after January 1, 2013, and the second lender is still out of luck. The result, the borrower walks away from the foreclosure and the unsatified second lender with no personal deficiency liability.
 
 
NOW WHAT ABOUT THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT AND THE IRS?
Prior to 2007, any foregiveness of debt was taxable by the federal government as income. But, during the height of the housing meltdown in 2007, the US Congress enacted the Mortgage Foregiveness Debt Relief Act which allowed homeowners to exclude from their taxable income up to $2,000,000 of foregiven debt on their primary residence in a foreclosure, loan restructure or short sale. This expires on January 1, 2014 and Congress has not shed any light whether they will extend this or not.
 
However, the IRS has stated in a letter to Senator Boxer of California on September 19, 2013 that, "if a property owner cannot be held personally liable for the difference between the loan balance and the sales price ... the owner would not treat the cancelled debt as income." 
 

Because of California's very fair treatment of borrowers in foreclosure and short sale, this State's laws likely protect against any liability to the lender and the government for their painful home financial situation.

 
Can My Lender Sue for Deficiency in a Foreclosure in California?

 

 

Comments(6)

Kathy Sheehan
Bay Equity, LLC 770-634-4021 - Atlanta, GA
Senior Loan Officer

Great information.  It should be noted that each state has its own laws regarding foreclosure.

Nov 25, 2013 09:08 AM
Jay & Michelle Lieberman
Keller Williams World Class - Agoura Hills, CA
Creating Calm in the Buying and Selling Chaos

Kathy:  Absolutely.  I like to only talk about California here.

Nov 25, 2013 09:53 AM
Wayne Johnson
Coldwell Banker D'Ann Harper REALTORS® - San Antonio, TX
San Antonio REALTOR, San Antonio Homes For Sale

Michelle and Jay-That is a very detailed list you provided. Homeowners facing foreclosure should seek advice from professionals like you two in addition to whatever other assistance is available to help them make good decisions.

Nov 26, 2013 12:43 AM
Renée Donohue~Home Photography
Savvy Home Pix - Allegan, MI
Western Michigan Real Estate Photographer

What a thorough post for deficiency judgments in California!  Lots of research went into this!

Nov 26, 2013 08:33 AM
Jay & Michelle Lieberman
Keller Williams World Class - Agoura Hills, CA
Creating Calm in the Buying and Selling Chaos

Wayne:  Thanks for the kind words.

Renee:  It is a fairly detailed and technical situation out here in CA.

Nov 27, 2013 02:31 AM
MichelleCherie Carr Crowe .Just Call. 408-252-8900
Get Results Team...Just Call (408) 252-8900! . DRE #00901962 . Licensed to Sell since 1985 . Altas Realty - San Jose, CA
Family Helping Families Buy & Sell Homes 40+ Years

Thank you for the detailed answer to an important question for homeowners facing foreclosure and/or short sale.

Nov 28, 2013 02:27 PM