While reading a recent post entitled Would YOU Say Something? by Kathy Passarette, a Long Island Staging Professional, it got me to thinking about REALTORS®, photography and MLS photos.  In Kathy's post, she was questioning whether or not to mention to a local REALTOR® that the photos of a particular listing on MLS didn't show the home in the best light.

  

Being a Long Island REALTOR®, I know that it is a challenge to get people to pay a professional stager to prepare their home for sale on Long Island.  However, even if we cannot convince the homeowners to pay for staging, we should at least take it upon ourselves to have them get their home into "show-ready" condition before photographs are taken for MLS and all marketing materials.

 

Some homeowners do whatever it takes to get the home into "show-ready" condition, and yet the photos that potential buyers see still don't do the home any justice, and there is a simple explanation for this.  Many REALTORS® take their own photos of their listings instead of letting a professional photographer take them.  In my opinion, this is a mistake.  Of course, there is always an exception to any rule, and there may be a number of REALTORS® out there that take outstanding photos.  Generally speaking though, this is not the case.

 

As REALTORS®, we can clearly see the pitfalls that people make when they decide to sell their home on their own.  After all, we are professionally trained to do what a FSBO may only do once or twice in a lifetime.  How can they possibly be as effective as we are when marketing their home?  The answer is...they can't!  This is not to say that all FSBO's are doomed to fail, or that they all will receive much lower offers than they would if they used a REALTOR®, although the statistics do show that this is true in most cases.

 

Can a FSBO sell their home on their own?  Yes, some of them can.  Can a REALTOR® take professional looking photos of a home? Some of us can, but most of us don't.  Our job is to market a home, and while photography is part of marketing a home properly, it is not something that we do often enough to qualify us as professionals. 

 

I'd like to share with you some examples of homes photographed by REALTORS® and also by a professional photographer.  These are not exaggerated examples for effect.  Both of these homes were previously listed and expired.  When I took over each listing, I had the homes photographed by a professional photographer, who also put together the virtual tour.  The cost for the total package for each was less than the cost to run a photo ad in the local newspaper for two days.

 

REALTOR                                                                         PROFESSIONAL PHOTOGRAPHER

Home # 1

Home # 2

 

As you can see, there is a noticeable difference between the photos.  The professional photographer brought the homes to life, and made each room feel very large, while the photos by REALTORS® did very little to show the homes in their true light.  This doesn't mean that they are not good at what they do.  It simply shows that there are people that are better at certain things, and there is no shame in delegating. 

 

It is widely accepted that the most effective executives are the ones that surround themselves with people that are better than them at certain aspects of their job.  Just like a chain is only as strong as its weakest link, a marketing campaign is only as strong as its weakest link.  Arguably, the most important part of the marketing campaign (outside of price) is visual.  If the photos that you are using are not the best that they can be, then you are placing yourself, and more importantly, your homeowner, at a disadvantage. 

 

So why do REALTORS® choose not to hire a professional photographer?  There are two main reasons that I can think of, and they are as follows:

[1] COST - Why pay for something that you can do for free?  I'm sure that most FSBO's would agree with this statement.

 

[2] CONTROL - Many REALTORS® have trouble delegating because they feel that they can do it better themselves.  Again, the FSBO's are probably in full agreement on this one.

 

 We are in a competitive marketplace right now.  Many homes are expiring from the market each day.  Do you want your listings to be the ones that sell, or the ones that sit and eventually expire?  One simple solution to making your listings stand out is to have them be the most appealing looking homes on MLS.  By the way, both of the examples listed above ended up selling for very close to asking price, in a relatively short amount of time, in a declining market.

 

If you're looking for a point of differentiation when going on a listing appointment, tell the homeowners that you'll be hiring a professional photographer to take pictures of their home.  The odds are that your competition won't be making that same promise.

 

 
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: The Art Of Marketing You
Post is included in group: RE/MAX Active Rain Bloggers
Post is included in group: Real Estate Rookie
Post is included in group: Dedicated Bloggers

90 Comments on Do You Hire Professional Photographers?

20 Most Recent Comments Displayed Show All

MAR
28
2008
276,814 Points 3 Featured Posts Outside Blog
Adam- I love the not so subtle hint! Thanks my friend, from one who often has trouble delegating! :.)
10:01am • #71
Adam - What a difference a professional photographer makes.  I take my own pictures and then I bring them back to my computer where I have a photo editing program.  Sometimes I think the Realtor just takes the shot and they don't take the time to see it in someone else's eyes.  Great post.  Thank you for sharing it with us. 
9:42pm • #72
MAR
29
2008
1,518,332 Points 112 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Called Shot Master

Adam:

I think that if Realtors are prepared to do the necessary photo editing, then they should not feel obligated to hire a professional photographer.  But EVERY photo needs editing when you take it.  And I usually "over snap" when taking photos.  I take them from a variety of angles to find the best ones.  Photos can sell your listings.  Even Realtors are guilty of thinking "There must be something wrong with that house," if there are no photos, or only a few.

12:33pm • #73
MAR
31
2008
823,700 Points 155 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog Hit Router Attended Rain Camp Called Shot Master
Even a professional photographer, however, cannot make a blah room look good.  If the master bedroom has tired faded bedding, no headboard, scrawny little lamps, nothing hanging on the wall, and a chair that looks doll-house size compared to the cavernous space - no one can make it look good except a stager with borrowed props.  This is about the 5th post I've seen lately on the topic of photos, and while I agree that a professional photographer can work wonders, a REALTOR is selling the product the seller lists with us.  And we have to know when a photo is better NOT taken by anyone.  That is part of our job, too.
7:25am • #74
1 Featured Post

Adam,

I think there are clear advantages for using a professional photographer, but also times when editing works too.  Here's a before and after I did (VERY basic, 5 minutes or less edit I did for a house I staged).  The agent is doing a virtual tour, so I really just took this shot for my use.  

 After

4:15pm • #75
APR
03
2008

Adam,

I don't use a professional photographer, but as a gift, my husband gave me a fantastic nikon D40 for Christmas and all I can say is "WOW", what a difference a great camera makes!  Good photo-editing is also really important and there are a number of software programs that will do the trick. I enjoy taking the photos myself, but if I did not have this camera and a little bit of an eye for it, I would absolutely use a photoographer. A picture REALLY is worth a thousand words!

 

12:56pm • #76
APR
11
2008
Great Blog!  Every MLS must suffer from this problem!  Sometimes it's good for a laugh but at the same time it's sad because it's at someones expense. 
9:24pm • #77
APR
18
2008
2 Featured Posts Attended Rain Camp
Wow - lots of talk about this subject.  We always use a professional for our virtual tours and we take the photos from his tour.  He does incredible work and doesn't even take new customers he's so busy.  Its expensive vs what it would cost if we did it ourselves or even hired someone cheaper but there is tremendous value.  The sellers love what he does for their homes.  It makes a huge difference.  Most time the buyers are in another state and they are going through Realtor.com and looking at tours or photos.  They better look good.  Thanks for the great post.
3:34am • #78
I love the pictures...I am looking for a professional right now!!  This is a great selling feature on your listing appt.  Thanks for the heads up.
9:16am • #79

My goodness you must have read my blogs and my mind. I have to take my hat off to you and thank you. I have a virtual tour company and I call realtors who tried to do everything themselves FSBO's.  take a look at what I have been writing and you'll crack up!

6:52pm • #80
APR
19
2008
In a perfect world, I'd have a photographer take all my pics; however, I don't, so I take pictures of listed property myself. Thankfully, I have JASC PSP v7 to correct photo mistakes like inadvertantly angled shots, or pictures that are too dark/light. =o)
5:49pm • #81
JUL
10
2008

how does a free lance photographer charge by the hr, by the pictures, by assignment. might be a dumb ? but i would like to get started in this industry asap thank you very much.

mar
12:32pm • #82
274,066 Points 41 Featured Posts Outside Blog

MAR:  The photographer that I use is paid through the company that does my virtual tours.  However, my guess is that the best way to price would be by the amount of photos taken.  The virtual tour company offers different packages based on the size of the homes.

12:35pm • #83
NOV
06
2008

Pro photographers are a must! You sell your services as a professional by ensuring everything you do is seen to be professional. I'm a Downtown Vancouver Realtor and competition is fierce. You don't win with low quality poorly shot pictures.

1:31am • #85
MAR
24
2009

Adam,

I found this while doing a search. Thank you thank you for posting this.

I am a fledgling real estate photographer in a small town where the demand for my work will come in the next decade or so.

I love how you compared Professional Real Estate Photographers to FSBOs. This is a comparrison I like to use, too. Imagine being one of the very first Real Estate Agents ever...in a world where people are all and always have been FSBOs. You would have your work cut out trying to convince folks that you have ways to get that house sold more quickly and for more money!

That's how my job is at the moment, and it is tough. In the industry, it is said that only a small percentage of the top selling 10% of agents "get it". Thanks, Adam, for being one who does!

Just like you expect sellers to use your services, sellers (and buyer alike) want you to use a professional photographer! It's a great way to show them you are willing to do whatever it takes to sell the home.

Be honest with yourself and admit when you need help. As many have mentioned, not all photographers are created equal, do your shopping. No, you don't want someone who photoshops-in green grass or one who's photos are just marginally better than your own. Also, it will probably not be worth hiring a professional for the less expensive homes, but you need to draw a line (ie: $400,000) at which you will delegate to a pro., and not just any pro. Look for an independent Real Estate Photographer, find out how they've been trained. "Photographers" from some of the virtual tour companies rarely have any real training and though some are very good, others are very bad.  A good place to look is at Larry Lohrman's PFRE blog (just google it). He has a directory of Real Estate Photographers, many of whom are the best in the industry.

 

11:48pm • #86
JUN
16
2009

I'm currently in my third year of specializing in real estate photography and this post is great. There have been many good points made.

In my business I want to represent the home as you see it. I don't want it to appear larger or nicer than it is. I WILL NOT photoshop out any wires, telephone poles, electrical boxes or fire hydrants. I won't even green up the grass. I may add the odd fire to the fire place, add an image to a flat screen TV or blue up the sky though.

For those of you that may think professional photography isn't worth the money, I have quite a few clients who have had listings on the market for months and months, but within a month of having me in to photograph and/or create a single property website or 360° virtual tour, they have sold!! Excellent pictures capture the buyers attention, they don't sell the home. That's the realtors job. I'll hook em with the pictures, you reel em in!

And just because you have a Nikon or Canon camera with a wide angle lens, doesn't mean you're going to take great pictures. A lot goes into learning this craft... and I continue to learn on a daily basis.

I am also a strong advocate for the Photography For Real Estate website. You need a pro, you'll find them there!

Linda

 

11:01pm • #87
JUN
17
2009
1 Featured Post

 

I have to say that I take my own photos. In fact, I hire out to other agents to take their photos as well. But it takes more than a wide angle lens to take great real estate photos. It takes more than a couple of flashes to take great real estate photos. It takes someone with the knowledge of how to take great real estate photos, to get great real estate photos. 

Susie L- You hit it on the head with your comment "photographers from some of the virtual tour companies rarely have any real training and though some are very good, others are very bad." I love that comment and can attest to that in our local market. 

I shot this house for an agent. That agent ended up losing the listing to another agent. The 2nd agent used a local vender to shoot the same house. Here's one example of my shot vs that virtual tour company's shot. The shots that this one particular photographer at the vt company took are no better than the average agent's shots. And this was on a $2M listing where our average is $220k. 

The one thing that gets me is the number of comments that say "well it is prohibitive in my area..." What is prohibitive about spending $200 or less on great photos? Just be forewarned that some "professional photographers" are not all that great, as Susie L mentioned. But lest us forget, Sunday paper ads (when agents did those things) in our area used to cost nearly $200 for a picture ad along with a line listing! 

So for the price of one Sunday picture ad, you can now get great photos that you can use on all your marketing pieces.

 

 

7:35am • #88
JUL
11
2009

Now days it's not just taking a good photo - it's what can be done to it in post-production to make it look more like the human eye would see a room.

This image is straight from a pro camera. It's brightness range is limited by the camera sensor.

Straight out of a pro camera

 

This is the same image post-processed to increase its dynamic range to approximate what the human eye would see:

HDR processing

Could this latest photo technology reduce the DOM? Result in a closing prior to having the first price reduction? Would the savings of a price reduction more than pay for the cost of a talented pro photographer? Or would it just not make a difference?

 

12:13pm • #89
OCT
01
2009

Buying a good camera to take real estate photos without knowing how to fully use it is really a waste of your time and money...   To properly develop and edit photos, it takes years of training and hours of time on each shoot that could be better spent working on your business...   When you are hiring the services of a professional photographer you are paying them for their time, their investment in equipment and education, and their talent as both a photographer and editor.   You are also freeing up your own time so that you can get more done in your day.  This is why the most successful real estate agents refuse to take their own photos.   I have seen dozens and dozens of homes sold much more quickly with the help of my professional photography, but it is no substitute for the Realtor doing their work too...  You have to properly present the home, and make sure everything is looking good and in good working order.  Taking professional photos of a dirty house or one that needs a lot of maintenance upgrades is kind of like trying to put lipstick on a pig.   Photography is just one part of the whole marketing picture, but one that is often overlooked and neglected.  You wouldn't try to do the home inspection yourself, so why would you want to try and do the photography yourself?   

5:30pm • #90
FEB
27
2010

In this down market, a professional photographer hired to shoot your new and existing porporties can give you that edge you need. Try Carson Photography in Phoenix Arizona. You wont be disapointed.

 

www.carsonphoto.net

Carson Day
6:53pm • #91

20 Most Recent Comments Displayed Show All


What does the graphic say?
Leave a response…


(optional)
Spam Prevention:
 

Adam Waldman - Long Island REALTOR®

Hauppauge, NY

More about me…

Westcott Group Real Estate Company

Cell Phone: (631) 357-2036

Email Me

Long Island Real Estate and Relocation Specialist. Please read my blog for tips on how to sell your home for the most amount of money in the shortest amount of time, general real estate advice and consultation on out-of-state relocations. View Adam Waldman's profile on LinkedIn <!-- Start of StatCounter Code -->
javascript hit counter
<!-- End of StatCounter Code --> site statistics


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog