How your earnest money advice can make or break a deal
I recently read a post from a local agent suggesting that .5%-1% of the home's value is a good earnest money amount. GASP! The agent is trying to "protect" the buyers' interests by limiting their financial exposure. The agent truly believes he is doing the buyer a favor. I disagree.
So you and your buyer finally get that $200,000 house under contract. To 'protect your client' you suggest they write a $1000 earnest money check. Now the sellers aren't excited about that, but they accept it. So far, so good.
Now along comes Suzie and Jonah Homebuyer, also looking to buy a home. Jonah saw the home (soon to be you're buyers' home,we hope) last week and LOVED it! He was just waiting for Suzie to get back from a short trip. Jonah and Suzie want the house badly enough that they offer the sellers $5,000 more than your buyer did. The sellers accept it. Have you ever heard the phrase, "So sue me?"
The sellers refuse to close with your buyers. Now what do you do? Your buyer could sue for specific performance to get the house, or they can get their earnest money back. In many states, the seller would owe them double their earnest money, too.
The sellers know your clients probably won't sue them, so they sell to Suzie and Jonah Homebuyer and put an extra $3000 in their pockets.
Here are a few other problems with low earnest money amounts:
- it makes your clients look like they can't afford the house
- it makes your clients offer look weak when there are competing offers
- it makes your clients appear wishy-washy or uncertain of their decision
- it limits the commitment of the buyers (who wants to work with buyers who make offers on things they're not sure they want?
By the way, this really happened to me!
Comments(6)