Housing and Urban Development Secretary Alphonso Jackson announced his resignation this past Monday. Mr. Jackson was accused by two senators from Washington (Patty Murray) and Connecticut (Christopher Dodd) of being ineffective from wrongdoing. With FHA loans making a comeback, Alphonso Jackson resignation can be a critical factor in what upcoming decision to be made in tackling the housing crisis.
With FHA Loans starting to make a comeback in today's marketplace, ever wonder why some investors/lenders put restriction of FHA loans that HUD doesn't have?
If the United States government stands behind (issues) debt, why wouldn't the rates be very low? Many investors have put more restrictive guidelines in place, and it's not new to put overlays on guidelines on loans that Fannie or Freddie will buy, or that HUD will guarantee. For example, HUD will allow manufactured housing but some investors won't. Although the government insures loans, the difference in opinion on the value comes in servicing: does the lender invest in the servicing on these loans? HUD does not insure lenders against the cost of delinquencies, foreclosures, etc., or the servicing-released premium that lenders pay.