Special offer

California Court of Appeal Holds Lender Waived Right to Deficiency Judgment

By
Real Estate Agent with HomeSmart, Evergreen Realty

In First California Bank v. McDonald, a California court of appeal recently held that a lender waived its right to a deficiency judgment where it permitted the sale of real property outside of the judicial foreclosure without the borrower’s consent.

CA laws and Real EstateIn this case – First California Bank v. McDonald – a husband and wife signed a promissory note secured by a deed of trust against certain real property in California. They also provided additional security in the form of a deed of trust against a different property.  The wife subsequently sold the second property with the bank’s agreement that it would receive the proceeds from that property. There was no release as to the borrowers.  The bank’s note went into default after the husband died.  The bank subsequently filed a complaint for judicial foreclosure and sought a deficiency judgment against the wife and children. The trial court granted summary adjudication as to the bank’s claim for judicial foreclosure ordering the sale of the property. The court found that the wife and estate representatives were subject to a deficiency judgment for the unpaid amount.

The wife and estate appealed, contending that their arrangement with the bank released its deed of trust as to the second property and therefore, the bank had waived any right to a deficiency judgment under Code of Civil Procedure §726(a).

The court of appeals agreed and reversed. The appellate court found that the bank failed to follow the requirements of §726 and did not obtain the wife’s nor children’s consent or waiver that the property was being sold outside of judicial foreclosure. There was no evidence that the bank obtained their consent to the release of the secured interest in the property and there was no evidence as to how the proceeds of the sale were actually applied. As such, the bank waived its right to a judicial foreclosure.

Source of information is article by Shannon B. Jones, California real estate attorney  –  See court of appeal decision – http://www.courts.ca.gov/opinions/documents/F067812.PDF

By Harrison K. Long, real estate broker, Realtor, professional real estate representative and attorney at Orange County CA.

Coldwell Banker residential brokerage

 

 

We provide professional real estate agent and broker representation – help for property owners, home sellers, private trust estate representatives, estate administrators, executors and heirs, probate and trust attorneys, estate planners, income tax professionals, public guardians, fiduciaries, investor group managers, bankers, and individuals, with listing and sale of properties at Orange County, CA.  Contact us at 949-854-7747 with your questions about home prices and values at Orange County CA cities and areas with Home Selling and Real Estate market updates.  

This post about California law is for information only and is not the providing of legal services.  If you have questions about legal issues with your real estate situation or transaction, you should contact an experienced real estate attorney. 

Posted by

 

Hannah Williams
HomeStarr Realty - Philadelphia, PA
Expertise NE Philadelphia & Bucks 215-820-3376

Harrison K. Long  This is a very interesting finding by the courts

Jan 17, 2015 03:26 AM
Harrison K. Long
HomeSmart, Evergreen Realty - Irvine, CA
REALTOR , GRI, Broker associate, Attorney

Hannah ... You are right that the holding by the CA court of appeal in this case is interesting.  However, it's not totally surprising.  CA rarely has judicial foreclosures, and lenders are sometimes not careful enough to follow the strict guidelines.

Jan 17, 2015 03:55 AM
Endre Barath, Jr.
Berkshire Hathaway HomeServices California Properties - Beverly Hills, CA
Realtor - Los Angeles Home Sales 310.486.1002

Great information Harrison, have not stopped by in a while have a Happy New Year, Endre

Jan 27, 2015 04:53 PM