Special offer

CALLING ALL ETHICAL LOAN OFFICERS - HELLO? ANYONE THERE?

By
Real Estate Attorney with THE ZARETSKY LAW GROUP - Board Certified Real Estate Atty and AUTOMATED LAND TITLE COMPANY

Calling All Ethical Loan Officers - Hello?  Anyone There?

Every day I field questions about short sales, foreclosures and real estate investing.  I represent developers, lenders, buyers, sellers, the sharks and the lambs.  All have different work for me and all need different solutions.  Today a call came in that was as they call it - "Over The Top"!  It compels this article on loan officers and how some continue to intentionally contribute to the financial credit mess our industry is experiencing.  The names are fictitious but the scenario unfortunately is something I have heard often.

Here is how it went.

Mr. Smith called because he was referred by another client and he is getting divorced.  He owns his home with his wife and they bought it in 2003.  The purchase price was $350,000 and they used a mortgage to purchase it in the amount of $280,000 - a nice traditional 80% loan to value but with a 10 year amortization.  The current remaining balance of the loan is $185,000.  He has no problem with the current loan payments.  The current market value according to an appraisal that was done as part of the divorce is $450,000.  He does not want to keep the house because he does not need such as large home now that he is single and so he intends to put it up for sale and hope to get $450,000.  That would be $265,000 over the existing mortgage to put in his pocket.

Since Mr. and Mrs. Smith are now getting divorced, as part of the property settlement agreement the husband is getting the house but has to get his (former) wife off the mortgage.  To get his wife off the mortgage he will need to negotiate a removal of her name from the Note (not necessarily a big deal, since he has good credit and lots of equity), or he can refinance for a new mortgage.

Mr. Smith spoke with a loan officer.  The loan officer suggested that instead of selling the house, the loan officer could arrange for an appraisal for $590,000 and then because of Mr. Smith's good credit he would arrange a $530,000 mortgage.  Then (hope your sitting down for this one) he told Mr. Smith to tell the bank he cannot afford the mortgage anymore and short sell the house!  The whole reason for this was for Mr. Smith to pocket $345,000, which is $80,000 more than the value of the house and without the cost or hassle of selling it.  The loan officer had no problem with (1) ruining Mr. Smith's credit, (2) suggesting Mr. Smith commit bank fraud, or (3) pocketing for himself hefty loan fees based on a bogus appraisal and his orchestrated conspiracy to commit bank fraud.

This scenario is frightful and worse yet - I hear about this type of scenario having happened or being planned a few times a month!  Since I am not a lightning rod for these type of stories, I can surmise that it is happening a lot more than the few instances that make it to my ear.

Now please understand - I have nothing against honest, ethical loan officers and mortgage brokers are a great referral source for me.  My son is a mortgage broker and so is my cousin.  But it makes me damn scared and worried for the Mr. Smiths out there and our financial system and for the lack of morality of people that call themselves professionals - and licensed professionals at that - when this type of open and notorious attack on our own well being (i.e. the economy and the financial markets) is occurring right in front of us.

These unethical professionals are guiding unsuspecting and otherwise law abiding citizens to wreck havoc on our own investment funds for their own selfish and self indulgent shortsightedness.  It's instant gratification syndrome - "Never mind the consequences - make me money today and I will worry about the future - in the future!"

I am writing this article for several reasons. 

One reason is to alert the unsuspecting that there are professionals out there that pervert the definition of morality to suit their own pocketbooks.  If a scheme is too easy or too good to be true, it probably is either untrue or illegal.  Consult with an attorney if you have any question!

The other reason is to gather comments from your own stories.  Am I indeed a lightning rod for this scenario or is it happening elsewhere too?

Richard Zaretsky, Esq., RICHARD P. ZARETSKY P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 1655 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, SUITE 900, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401, PHONE 561 689 6660  RPZ99@FLORIDA-COUNSEL.COM - FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED IN REAL ESTATE LAW - We assist Brokers and Sellers with Short Sales
Matthew J Blum - (retired from the business)
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Richard, If every Industry we have good and bad. I agree those are very unethical Loan Officers. However, you did not go into detail about the property appraiser. Remember they are also licensed by the State as well and they are equally to blame.
Apr 09, 2008 11:17 PM
Richard Zaretsky
THE ZARETSKY LAW GROUP - Board Certified Real Estate Atty and AUTOMATED LAND TITLE COMPANY - West Palm Beach, FL
Florida Real Estate Attorney

Matt

I don't think the primary bad guy is the appraiser.  In the story even if the "real value" (which is subjective anyway) were to be used the loan officer's "sell" to the borrower was to make "sticking it to the bank" the better alternative to trying to traditionally sell the house on the open market.  The loan officer had blinders on and focused only on the loan fees to be earned.

Thanks for the comment!

Apr 10, 2008 12:18 AM
Matthew J Blum - (retired from the business)
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
Richard, I agree the Loan Officer had blinders on but keep in mind he/she would still have to have a licensed appraiser to go along with the scam
Apr 10, 2008 12:52 AM
Matthew Heavener
ERA Heavener Realty Co. - Jacksonville, FL

I think this type of thing is disgusting.  I find that people blackmail each other with these types of scams.  Typically, the REALTORS are in on it, the Appraisers are in on it, the Closing agents are in on it, and the buyer and seller are in on it.  If just one of them stands up and says no this is wrong the whole thing falls apart.  It takes allot of complicity to commit this type of loan fraud.  Finally, if just one of these individuals goes to their local state's attorney then we could rid the market of the scam by setting an example.

A ring of loan fraud artists recently was busted here in Jacksonville, and the business practices that resembled the loan fraud guys dramatically decreased.  Make an example so people know that it is dangerous and wrong.

Apr 10, 2008 01:37 PM
Wendy Rulnick
Rulnick Realty, Inc. - Destin, FL
"It's Wendy... It's Sold!"
Richard,  With all the focus now on mortgage fraud, this kind of blatant stuff is still going on, I see.  I had one scenario in Destin about a year and a half ago.  An agent tried to present an offer for $100,000 more than list price, and credit a third party company with the excess funds over the seller list price at closing.  He said they would "find" an appraiser to make it happen.  I reported the incident with supporting documentation to the Florida Division of Financial Services, where it is under investigation.  It turns out the third-party company was the mortgage broker.  Wendy
Apr 11, 2008 10:08 AM
Shirley Walker
Core Group Realty - Boise, ID
ABR, CRS, GRI

So - I am wondering about investors that negotiate the short sales on their own.  Then call a Realtor to list the property once they have an agreement with the bank.  They are not yet closed on the property but have an agreement with the bank.  They borrow hard money to close (they are not using  the new borrower's money ie simultaneus closing).  Then they deed the property into a land trust and resell it within a few days for more money.

What disclosures should I be sure are included in any offers accepted by the investor (such as - this acceptance is subject to Seller obtaining Title and bank short sale approval).

As the listing Realtor, I am not involved in any way in the short sale negotiations with the first seller.

Help me see the pitfalls here.

Thank you,  Shirley

 

May 13, 2008 10:36 AM
Richard Zaretsky
THE ZARETSKY LAW GROUP - Board Certified Real Estate Atty and AUTOMATED LAND TITLE COMPANY - West Palm Beach, FL
Florida Real Estate Attorney

My first and last question is why would they close and then put the property into a Land Trust?  What does that legitimately accomplish?

This scenario - minus the Land Trust which is a waste of time for no purpose - is fine. The new buyer will see that the title is really with the seller from whom new buyer is getting title.  New lender will see the current new owner in title, see that old seller sold it rather recently.  Old lender will see that the investor buyer was indeed the buyer and investor got a mortgage to finance it based on the old lender authorized sale price.

Provided all is disclosed - which in your comment it would be (or at least be of public record, which is the same as disclosure) - I don't see a problem.

Your suggested new buyer disclosures are fine since it sets out that the buyer has a contract to buy which is subject to a contingency.  You might want to add that the new buyer agrees not to back door the deal by offering a higher price to the old owner / old lender.

Richard Zaretsky, Esq., RICHARD P. ZARETSKY P.A. ATTORNEYS AT LAW, 1655 PALM BEACH LAKES BLVD, SUITE 900, WEST PALM BEACH, FLORIDA 33401, PHONE 561 689 6660  RPZ99@FLORIDA-COUNSEL.COM - FLORIDA BAR BOARD CERTIFIED IN REAL ESTATE LAW - We assist Brokers and Sellers with Short Sales

May 13, 2008 11:01 AM
Jim Sahnger
Palm Beach Financial Network - Sewalls Point, FL

The direction of the comments here are unfortunate at best and awful at their worst.  I was speaking with two people at a major bank last week that related stories to me of mortgage brokers submitting files with fraudulent information.

The degree to which some people will go to get a file closed is alarming, complete with falsified documents including W-2's for 2009 (note that the year isn't complete yet), paystubs for a pay period that has yet to be completed (pay period ending 5/31/08 on a file submitted early May) and misspelling the name of a national employer on a falsified paystub.  These would almost all be comical if not so awful in their very nature. 

These are just a few examples of situations that have led to the mortgage mess we find ourselves in today and I continue to be surprised at the length to which people will go to today to seek financing.

Times are tough for many and unfortunately we will likely see a lot more of this before the system works to purge itself of those not only submitting fraudulent files but also providing people with abhorrent information like the individual you write about here.

There has never been a time where working with a professional mortgage person has been more valuable to consumers and referral partners alike.

Jim Sahnger

May 27, 2008 06:58 AM