green
I’m
a big fan of “New” – New Construction,
new ideas, new technology, I love NEW stuff.
I love old stuff too but...
I’m sharing because when I hear the word
“green”...that historic turn-of-the century home is
not the first thing that comes to my mind – but maybe it
should be?
While reading green home tips online I ran across a thought
provoking opening line:
-Here’s the opening
line:
“The
greenest house is the house already built”
- (from Preservation Magazine
January/February 2008 issue)
A straightforward interpretation of
“going green” can be to upgrade to newer, energy
saving, more eco-friendly product versions as they’re
developed, and that can effect our home and lifestyle choices BUT
sometimes it isn’t as simple as all that. The question might
be: At what cost?
What cost to the environment for disposing of those outdated items
being replaced and what cost to our communities culturally and
historically when it involves teardowns and replacing things as
significant as homes.
Materials and energy that would be consumed to build new homes in their
place and amount of space consumed at the landfills for disposal are
two obvious considerations but there are more
Even “New” fans can acknowledge how existing and
older homes and communities contribute to sustainability and
“greenness” Their relevancy to the three
R’s “Reduce, Reuse, Recycle” is HUGE!
With education and awareness we can continue to help clients make
informed choices because “green” is a color as
diverse as the types of homes and people who live in them are.
So whether you agree with the statement or not... I Like it!
Is it true?–that may depend on the particular circumstances
and perspective.
Very thought provoking post. It seems like something that is already built, particularly a home that is built to last would be very green!