http://www.denverpost.com/economy/ci_8969187
With all the investigations and mud slinging with Title Insurance companies..there is a shining light for the Real Estate Brokerage Community and most importantly, the consumer. The growth of broker owned Affiliated Business Arrangements (AfBA) Title companies
were formed due to this exact undisclosed industry Sleeze. As a AfBA
title company owner, I can tell you, we have to operate so far above
the line and more importantly we disclose everything to the client, including all competing company rates. On the other hand,
the traditional, non-AfBA groups take money and things of value on the side. What people
and brokers do not know or do not want to know is that you can search
and comparison shop title and escrow rates and at http://www.MyTitleIns.com. It's a great site.
MyTitleIns.com is a 3rd party independent comparison site. You can complete a demo quote and you will see that the
average difference for buyer and seller title/escrow costs can vary
about $800-$1500 on any identical transaction! Wow, chump change for
most buyers and sellers huh!
Everyone in the industry top to bottom has
known about this little shell game (marketing agreements). These above the table, known, written "marketing agreements" can be investigated easily. However, what's not talked about is the so called "ghost" kickbacks paid to individual real
estate brokers and undisclosed to the unknowing client. Things like gas
cards, free postage, dinners, lunches, Shotgun Willies, cell phone
bills, airfares, education, conventions, free drinks, free brochures, free
800#s, free farm packages, and on and on. The power of politics
(friends in high places) will prohibit the DORE or DOI from doing a
full blown audit and taking a good hard look at the books of all the
real Title Insurance "marketing" costs...including those expense
accounts of the "title sales representatives".
Up until the last five or so years, Title Insurance has been
a monopoly. Until the advent of PC's and digital storage, the big five
title companies had a virtual lock on all title insurance in the metro
Denver area. So it was just bribe the broker game from one company to the next.
Now, title searches are all done online and new title companies outside
of the monopoly are in the game. Smaller quality operated, some are
AfBAs, title companys are providing full fee disclosure and providing
the lowest title and escrow costs in the state to consumers. Like every
other business, they operate on lean operating budgets, high technology
and do not need any form of marketing. All the business is generated by
the Partner Owners and the savings, which is substantial, is given to
the consumer.
I would like to see Margaret Jackson focus on the
examples of Title Companies that are fully complying with all the rules
and regulations and providing the consumer with full disclosure and the
lowest costs, period! until there are big changes in the real estate industry, Title Insurance is a needed part of the
Real Estate Transaction. It's a service and product like anything else
and can be shopped and compared. Since the general public takes,
without even asking, the recommendation of the real estate broker as to
the choice of Title Company, you would think that true professionals
would shop costs for their clients...well until the playing field is
level, why would they shop. The Real estate commission is looking at
some type of compliance action to force brokers to provide evidence
that they "shopped" title insurance or that the client is aware that
they should shop prior to making a decision.
Bravo.


Interesting post....While my company is both a real estate and a mortgage company....so, I'm not against controlled business arrangements in and of themselves, I'm surprised that you seem to be making the argument that they are less prone to kickback abuses???
Here in St. Louis there is a certain large real estate company (more than one, I'm sure) that also owns a mortgage company and a title company. While they don't give kickbacks directly to the agents, the managers of their office's compensation is partially based upon what percentage of their transactions go to these controlled entities. While not a direct violation of RESPA, I personally think that it violates the spirit of the law.
Regarding your point of all the various forms of kickbacks that ancillary service providers give to agents, I think that you're right on! Kickbacks such as these need to be stopped! Again, here in St. Louis and I'm sure elsewhere, it's not unusual to see a tiny blurb at the bottom of an agent's bill board or magazine ad for some lender.....Unless the agent is paying for the percentage of the ad that is about them, then it's a kick back!
Bob Mitchell
ValueList Real Estate Services, Inc.