Special offer

Going Green in the Bathroom

By
Real Estate Agent with Century 21 Zwygart Real Estate

 Sage or avocado?  Hunter or mint?  If we were talking paint, my choice would be sage, but let's talk toilets.  

Oh the lowly commode. It has finally started going modern in recent years.  The days of huge tanks and endless flushes are gone thankfully.  Low flow  toilets made their appearance on the market many years ago, but can we do better?  

Change starts with people's awareness, and with water shortages in parts of the US in recent years, people are starting to become aware of their water usage.  HE front loading washers are gaining popularity, and Energy Star certification has become standard on dishwashers, saving up to 40% of the water used in non-Energy Star dishwashers.  But can we do better?

That brings us in to the bathroom and the lowly commode.  It is estimated that fifty percent of households in the US today  have only toilets that use 4 gallons of water or more per flush.  Four gallons or more!   Wasteful to the extreme.

We have all heard "If it is yellow, let it mellow.  If it is brown, flush it down."  Truly, though, how practical is this?  It will not work in a public bathroom situation, and most households in the US will not practice it.  We should instead look to technologies that have been commonplace in Australia, Europe, Asia and the Middle East for years.

Dual flush toilets are an easy way to conserve water.  They have two flushing options - #1 and #2 for #1 and #2 if you will pardon the pun.  Use one option for flushing liquid waste and use a minuscule .08 gallons of water per flush. For solids, utilize the second flush option.  It is still an ultra low flow toilet and uses merely 1.6 gallons per flush.  Dual flush toilets can result in a 40-60% reduction in water usage for the toilet in most households, even more if your home is one using outdated waterhogs.  

The dual flush toilets first started appearing in the US a few years ago, and they are becoming easier to find.  Perhaps your local building supply story may not stock them, but if you ask, you can probably special order one.  Caroma entered the US market in 1998, and US companies have followed suit with units being offered by Kohler, Mansfield, Vitra, Vortens and more.  

Dual flush and ultra low flow toilets are a great idea whose time has come in the US.  Water is a precious resource and should be conserved.  Dual flush toilets are an easy way to conserve a large amount of water easily.

Posted by

 

Brenda Carus
Towne Square Realty
Certified EcoBroker, Re/Max Green Agent
Monroe Area Real Estate

Looking for a place to live a real life? Know your neighbors, eat local, abandon your commute, be part of a community - come to Green County. Whatever your preference is, we have it all from surprisingly urban to truly rural and everything in between.

Jeff Fullmer
FM Properties - Idaho Falls, ID
Real Estate Investor/Financier

I have never heard of a dual flush. Interesting, thanks for sharing! Do you know what the cost difference is?

Thanks for commenting on my blog today. Just so you know, that was not frost on the daffodils but the start of 3" of snow!  = )

May 01, 2008 05:54 AM
Brenda Carus
Century 21 Zwygart Real Estate - Monroe, WI
As with anything else, price varies greatly.  I think they start around $250 and go up from there.  There are options between $250 and $350, but some are more expensive too, $500 or more.
May 01, 2008 03:50 PM
JoEllen Stranger-Thorsen
Eustis, FL
Lake County, FL

I hadn't heard of this for a residential use either. Our travel trailer has a dual flush, necessary to conserve water and conserve space in the septic holding if you don't have full hook-up.

May 02, 2008 01:03 AM
Colleen MacDonald
Palouse Commercial Real Estate - Pullman, WA
The dual flush is a great idea, but at a cost of over $200? I don't think the average family would be able to get over the sticker-shock! Another much more feesible option if to take a few bricks and put them in the tank of the existing toilet. The other problem I could see is teaching kids which button or handle to push for what they did. I know other coutries have been using the system for years, but it just seems like it would be about as easy to teach a kid how to use the toilet as it is to teach them how much paper not to use. Just my two cents.
May 03, 2008 07:37 PM
Andrew Magliochetti CCIM
Helios Realty and Development - Chicago, IL

To Colleen's point, it may be more cost-effective to modify an existing toilet, but if you're remodeling or replacing out of need, $200 is more than reasonable for a quality bath fixture.

May 05, 2008 03:31 AM
Brenda Carus
Century 21 Zwygart Real Estate - Monroe, WI

Don't forget to look at the payback via savings in water bills.  It is estimated that ultra-low flow toilets would save the average US home over ten gallons of water per day.  Multiply that by a year and that is over 3650 gallons.  Dual flush toilets save approximately 40-60% more water than ULF toilets do.  As more communities in the US are faced with water shortages and as the price of water rises, dual flush toilets could easily pay for themselves.

I have never had a problem teaching my children how to use a toilet properly with regard to paper and flushing,  My husband, well that is another story!  

May 05, 2008 05:28 AM
Colleen MacDonald
Palouse Commercial Real Estate - Pullman, WA

I had to laugh a little at the husband comment.

I was thinking the other day about what seems to be a relatively recent push for conservation (maybe it's just in my area). I grew up in a house that did alot of the things that are talked about on these forums. We wore sweaters instead of turning up the heat. Our shower had a shut-off valve so the water wasn't going full bore when you didn't need it. The toilet was rigged to use only the needed amount to get the paper down it, not one drop more. We did all of this not because my parents cared about the environment (even though the did). All of it was done because of money. I am from a large family and when you multiply the cost of all that water and heat by 10 people, it is alot of money.

I believe it is our job to educate people as to the cost savings. Yes, that dual flush toilet is going to set you back a pretty penny, but how much will it reduce your water bill? Yes, the front-loading washing machine is more expensive, but it is more gentle on your clothes and uses less water reducing two bills.

I wasn't saying in my original post that people shouldn't buy a dual flush because of the initial cost. I just think without proper education and information they won't.

May 05, 2008 05:55 AM
Brenda Carus
Century 21 Zwygart Real Estate - Monroe, WI

I agree that proper eduction in the long term benefits of most conservation efforts is key.  Too many people have blinders on and only see the what is right in front of them, the short term.  The long term payback of most simply conservation measures is a benefit that should not be overlooked.

You are so right when you say that many conservation efforts are simply a renewal of older thinking - turn down the heat and put on a sweater, open the windows and wear a tank top instead of turning on the air, compost your food scraps instead of throwing them out.  The best environmental efforts are not done through innovative technologies like solar panels and wind turbines, but rather through old fashioned steps to reduce energy usage. 

May 05, 2008 10:00 AM
Gary Woltal
Keller Williams Realty - Flower Mound, TX
Assoc. Broker Realtor SFR Dallas Ft. Worth
Brenda, I know some toilets have a low water option for anytime it is used as well. Definitely should conserve our water.
May 05, 2008 03:46 PM
Bonnie & Terry Westbrook
Westbrook Realty - Ada, MI
Grand Rapids MI Real Estate

Brenda, I didn't know about the dual flush option on toilets -  what a great idea - it should be required in new homes. Not sure I'm up for replacing all of ours just yet but nice to know it is available.

May 13, 2008 02:10 PM