|
Find DC real estate agents and Washington real estate on ActiveRain.
Disclaimer: ActiveRain Corp. does not necessarily endorse the real estate agents, loan officers and brokers listed on this site. These real estate profiles, blogs and blog entries are provided here as a courtesy to our visitors to help them make an informed decision when buying or selling a house. ActiveRain Corp. takes no responsibility for the content in these profiles, that are written by the members of this community.
© 2013 ActiveRain Corp. All Rights Reserved
26 Comments on The hidden cost of bad advice ......
I do not like discussing commissions....however.....in our area the competition is a whole other ball game. The result: I haven't seen a coop in your "expected range" since I've been in the business. In fact, the typical coop around here would make your colleague's head SPIN! People who claim I whine about my commissions haven't tried being a buyers agent around my neck of the woods. With many of my sales being cooperatives in low price ranges it is a problem. With gas prices I could easily LOSE money on a lower end sale. What I suggest at the lower levels is that the buyer be willing to pay me the higher end of the commission spectrum and put it in an EBA. That way the commission doesn't matter. I am then assured that I will make more than $5/hour! Btw, this is significantly LOWER than what your friend feels she deserves.
Sometimes I have to insist on that because quite frankly I can't work for what a lot of these coops are offering at least not in the entry level price range. After splits my average commission (for all types of property) was less than $3k before taxes last year. The smaller units really dragged it down. If I have an entry level buyer I no longer have a choice. If they don't want to do it, I let them go. With gas the price that it is, there is sadly no other way! In truth I have always been able to work the commission into the price of the unit - so no one has ever had to pay me. However, an EBA solves a lot of these issues. But I won't misrepresent the issue and "hide listings" from buyers.
Ruthmarie - I know prices are different across the country and co-op rates probably vary widely. I believe that everyone should develop a way of reasonably guaranting that you will be paid what you deserve while making sure that practice does not preclude you from doing your job.
Including specific commission rates in posts makes me nervous too. That said, the matter of setting your commission is not rocket science. Buyers' agents don't have to work for hand-outs. Once the buyer's agent has the trust and confidence of a buyer, the matter of the compensation is easy to handle.
We're not going to settle the matter of paying the buyer's agent untill we have completely separate brokerage licenses, one for Buyers Brokers and one for Sellers Brokers.
Lenn Harley - Do either of us sleep? Great comment. Personally, the discussion of specific commission rates does not un-nerve me. General discussions among agents discussing something like this doe not meet the test of a RICO violation.
I have no problem earning a living as a buyers agent. As you well know, the bulk of my business is on the buyers side and if I had to choose, I would be a buyer's agent. I dare say that I have had success because I have a base frame work that takes place initially that identifies expectations and compensation. Once we are on the same page (and that part is not rocket science. the agreements are required by law if you are going to show all property. well unless you work for a broker that has no listings)
Then I sit and go over criteria. I pull up listings based on what I am presented with like any other agent should be able to do. The amount of compensation being offered is located at the bottom of page 3 of a agents view of a listing. It does not appear at all on the sellers copy. I usually work off the sellers copy. I like to have what they have.
Thanks for dropping in and sharing your thoughts, enjoy the wonderful morning.
I rarely even notice the BAC until it's time to submit my commission demand. But I am certain to offer the best I can when it's my listing because I know it's crucial to getting my listing shown and sold. I don't like it, but it's part of our business.
I AM here to make money and I don't appreciate the shrinking BAC's I'm seeing in my area. You remind me that I should be paying a bit more attention because if the BAC is that low, I have to wonder what else is being short-changed on that property. It may not necessarily be the best buy for my client if the owner is a tightwad. Deferred maintenance? Reduced chance of negotiation on repairs? What else are they being cheap about??
Well, John, I like some points of what you said but others I disagree with. Just because you don't ask for a buyers agency agreement doesn't make you a snake oil salesman. We don't require it because many people feel pressured into signing a contract with someone they just met, I don't put my clients in that situation. I am still bound by law to provide the customer with reasonable care even without making them sign a contract.
Second everyone has the right to offer more or less money to the agents who bring their clients, and in a competitive market place and free trade environment agents can choose to sell homes where they make the money they expect to make for their services. That is the freedom we have. You can offer a job at $9 and hour but if a similar job is going for $13 an hour of course the better canidates will not take the $9 an hour job.
It goes both ways, I would say a seller should offer a competitive rate if they want their house to get shown. Most buyers agency agreements if you fill in say for example 3% and the coop is 2.5 would have the buyer then having to pay the .5% to make up the difference. So they may not want to buy that home anyway. You agree with your client in the agreement what youa re working for. So it doesn't matter if they offer lower than your rate. Many discount brokers offering less money get much less showings, they should disclose that to their sellers if they are really looking out for them.
Mead Homes - Can I kindly but strongly disagree with you. If you have a problem having someone sign an agreement, include the caveat that they can cancel at anytime. If they don't like you on the way to the first showing, they can fire you. If they don't like you after day one, they can fire you. They are fully protected and at no risk to keeping an agent that they don't want to keep.
In Maryland, you can not show homes that are listed by your broker with out an agreement. You just can't do it. If you happen to work for a broker that has 43% of the market, you are actually rather stupid not to have an agreement signed. You have to tell the buyers that you can not show them listings that are under your broker. If they agree, well they apparently only want to see 57%. I won't do it. I won't walk out the door if they are not signed. It is never an issue. I happen to think that those that claim "they won't sign" are only exhibiting behavior that indicates they don't know what the BBA is and how to explain it.
You may be bound by ethics to provide them care, but State Law must be followed as well. What part of care includes that you can use the co-op offered as a determing factor of homes you will show?
On your second point, it is a free market. You can not remove listings from possible showings because of the amount of co-op offered. It is a violation of ethics. Your free trade environment only covers the buyers and sellers. You have to answer to a higher authority. For some reason, you are equating everything to reimbursement. If that were the case, we would have no scientist, we would have no one in the Peace Corp and we would not have many elected officials. If you want the term Realtor to mean something, you have to exhibit ethics above the folks that are chasing the dollar regardless of their clients needs and desires.
It does go many ways. I just happen to believe in the standards we preach. I believe we should practice what we preach. If discount brokers are getting less showings because of the co-op they offer, I hope they file a class action suit against any broker that is supporting that behavior.
Perhaps in your rush to judgement, you should put your balance sheet aside and take another look at what our code of ethics contains and understand, your reimbursement on any transaction is the result of the transaction and not part of the transaction.
Great post. I agree wholeheartedly. I feel the same way about realtors who only shop the listings within their own company - never showing buyers listings that meet their criteria because they are listed with another broker.
John: If a buyers agent wants to work for a specific commission, it is most important to have that buyer agency agreement filled out with whatever you feel you earn doing your job. That way, you can explain to to your buyers that if they want to see a listing that is 50% less than what you agreed to work for, they will be required to pay the other 50%. The problem solves itself. And yes, I do believe I worth every penny I ask for. The buying sides are much more intense. And with the cost of gas, what's to be ashamed about for asking what you are WORTH. This is a job. I am not a charity. Get the Buyers Agency Agreement filled out, and send all the listings to your clients and let them decide if a house is worth coming out of pocket for. You might be pleasantly surprised at how your hard work is perceived.
No requirement that the total commission be a 50/50 split with the Buyer Agent. If they are concerned about their compensation they should use a Buyer Broker Agreement.
Login or register to leave a comment