Earlier this year, as Mr. Bernanke continued to drop rates, I came out with the following statement: It isn't about rates. Its about guidelines. Rates could go to 2% and real estate can be cheap, but it doesn't matter if no one can qualify for a mortgage.
Those of us in the mortgage business could easily see the alarming truth early on: The ability to qualify for a loan was eroding quickly. The relentless tightening of lender guidelines means we race to close loans with the wind constantly at our backs. That wind is coming from windows of opportunity slamming shut.
It is now becoming clear that lower rates mandated by Bernanke have helped those with equitylines and adjustable rate mortgages stabilize payments. But it has not stopped the bleeding of the economy caused by the foreclosure epidemic.
Clearly, Ben Bernanke is alarmed a hemorrhage is just around the corner. After listening to his speech yesterday I came to the following conclusion: Ben's on the wrong track, focusing on symptoms instead of coming up with a cure.
Think about his statement for a moment:
"In some cases, when the source of the problem (foreclosures) is a decline of the value of the home well below the balance, the best solution may be a writedown of principal or other permanent modification of the loan,'' Bernanke said.
Banks ALREADY have decided they don't want to put any more eggs in the mortgage basket because those eggs are going rotten. Why do you think it is so difficult to convince ANY bank to put any new eggs in the basket????
Now Mr. Benanke is suggesting that banks shouldn't even throw out the old eggs because there must be SOME WAY the bank can help those eggs go UNROTTEN. (Do you think there is a reason there is no such word as "unrotten"?) He wants banks to "forgive" the decline in value and/or change the original terms of the loan.
Maybe this is cheaper than a foreclosure in the short run. But what precedent does it set for buying any fresh eggs? Now the bank must assume a risk factor that says "On these fresh eggs the bank must accept the responsibility if the value declines, or if the borrower can't afford to meet the original terms of the loan."

Question: Will this make banks want to put more new eggs in the basket? Get out of the egg business altogether? Certainly any NEW EGGS will have a far tougher criteria for getting into that basket.
And if the banks won't buy any eggs, what does this do to the price of the eggs? Will even more people walk away letting their eggs go rotten too?
Punishing the banks EVEN MORE for those ROTTEN EGGS only discourages the banks from wanting to buy fresh eggs. Until banks want to put more eggs in the mortgage basket, we will not have the ability to break the downward spiral of the economy.
Remember my formula:
Fewer people who can get loans = fewer buyers = more unsold houses =
declining values = even fewer people who can get loans....even fewer
buyers...even further declines in value..... and the spiral continues.
Watch out, Ben. You are fixing the symptom instead of the cause and could end up with egg on your face.
Written by Janet Guilbault, California Mortgage Expert Based Out of the San Francisco Bay Area
Bulls Eye, again. Mortgage rates are fungible when folks can finance their purchases with expected and predicted LTV requirements. Unfortunately, closing costs, down payments, etc. today are a moving target.
It doesn't help the market when a home buyers gets an appraisal that says "Declining Market" and then the mortgage company wants another 10% down.