I know, I know this topic has been debated left and right ad nauseum. This is not about that....well okay sort of...it's really more about being able to spend your Sunday's in your pajamas.
I always get the NAR Profile of Home Buyers and Sellers, and this year was no exception.
I rarely do open houses (2 in the past 4 years). I think they are ineffective and the risks are not worth it, for me. I know there are those agents that swear by them, and for new agents a way to potentially generate business, but is that really true...
I don't think there is any argument that open houses rarely sell houses. When you look at the overall statistics, it is clear they don't sell a house. The issue has always been that they are good potential client generation tool and therefore valuable to real estate agents. I think that needs to be rethought.
In the 2007 survey they list the top 5 ways that a buyer found their agent
- 43% were referred
- 11% used their previous agent
- 8% found them online
- 7% used an agent off a sign
- 6% found them at an open house
What is interesting is that last year, in the 2006 survey, finding an agent at an open house was the #2 way. So the fact that open houses are falling in the ranks as a way to find buyers, AND we already know they are ineffective in selling houses...what's the point?
With 8% finding us online and only 6% at an open house, how would you rather spend your Sunday...sitting at an open house or spending 30 minutes blogging online?
Me...I'll take my jammies, coffee, and the comfort of my leather chair any day.
I disagree - I find most of my buyers by making appointments (not getting leads) at open houses. You need to go and be ready to close.