Special offer

Are Your Income Properties a Business, an Investment, or Both?

By
Services for Real Estate Pros with Iowa Equity Exchange

Are your income properties a business, an investment, or both? I suspect most property owners would say they are both. That’s how I feel about mine. They certainly qualify as a business, but the primary reason I bought them was as an investment for the future.

Why does this matter? Because unless you own income property strictly as a business, you should be concerned with maximizing the investment quotient of your properties. How can this be done? There are several answers to that question, but one in particular is of interest to me in this article.

Off the top of my head, I can think of these ways to maximize your investment in your properties: 1) keep them well-maintained; 2) keep them rented to good tenants who pay regularly; 3) do what you can to lower expenses.1031 exchange

In addition to these and other “nuts and bolts” ways to maximize your investment, the investor should consider whether his equity is being well-utilized. Let’s define the term “investment” for purposes of this article as “the difference between a property’s value and the debt on that property.” Using this definition, “investment” is another word for “equity.” (There are two articles about increasing one’s return on equity in my blog postings: Ways to Increase Your Return on Equity and Return on Equity, in case you would like to read more about my opinion on this subject.)

Here’s an important thing to keep in mind that many overlook: As time passes, the value of your property increases (in a normal market!) and the amount of your debt decreases. Obviously, this means that your equity in the property rises. While the income from the property may also rise (usually the expenses rise, too), typically when net income is compared to equity, return on equity decreases over time.

What can be done about this phenomenon? After all, we all like that high percentage of return on equity that we got when we first bought that property, right? The answer is that you have to release some or all of that equity to work for you in another way. Refinancing the property can release a fair amount of the equity in your property, but not all of it. Usually a lender will require that the investor maintain 20% or so of his equity in the property during a refinance. Sometimes that’s okay. Another alternative to release equity is to sell the property and reinvest in a more expensive property. The problem with this is that a significant portion of your equity is going to go to the Internal Revenue Service in capital gain taxes and depreciation recapture, and to your state if state capital gain taxes apply.

The solution to releasing your equity to go to work for you elsewhere is found in Section 1031 of the Internal Revenue Code, which allows you to sell your property, defer all of your capital gain taxes and depreciation recapture, and put your equity to work in new property that will generate a higher rate of return.

If you have questions about exchanging, please let us know. We handle all types of exchanges. Experience The Power of Tax-Deferred Exchanges!

******

Please consider IOWA EQUITY EXCHANGE as your source for answers to your questions about Section 1031 like-kind tax-deferred exchanges. Contact us at your convenience for prompt, accurate information. Please think of us for your next exchange.

Ken Tharp

Iowa Equity Exchange

Providing Qualified Intermediary services for Section 1031 tax deferred exchanges all over the United States. Headquartered in Iowa, our services are available in Missouri, Kansas, Nebraska, Colorado, North Dakota, South Dakota, Minnesota, Wisconsin, Illinois, and all other states.

INTEGRITY. PRECISION. SECURITY.

Copyright © 2008 By Ken Tharp, All Rights Reserved. * Are Your Income Properties a Business, an Investment, or Both? * Contact Ken Tharp for information on Section 1031 tax-deferred exchanges anywhere in the United States.

 

Greg Hampton
Re/Max Around The Mountains - Blue Ridge, GA
North Georgia Mountain Property,Blue Rid

I would have to say both in most cases,great post,keep them coming.

May 16, 2008 09:13 AM
Ken Tharp
Iowa Equity Exchange - West Des Moines, IA
Section 1031 Exchanges, Iowa/U.S.

Greg - I agree, most people would answer, "Both." I know of some very long-term landlords in my area who have owned the same two or three apartment buildings for 20 or 30 years, have them paid off, and live on the income. For them, it is probably more of a day-to-day business than it is an investment, and they're not so worried about maximizing their return on equity. For the rest of us, it's an important concept.

Thanks for commenting!

May 16, 2008 09:20 AM
Robert Machado
HomePointe Property Management, CRMC - Sacramento, CA
CPM MPM - Property Manager and Property Management

I agree with both.  But, a case can be made for acquiring property with a goal of paying off the debt and using the cash flow for additional purchases or for cash flow.  I have seen a lot of investors that are so leveraged they cannot withstand a downturn.  They lose it all in those times. 

Using all the equity comes with lots of risk.

May 16, 2008 05:37 PM
Don Eichler
Eichler Properties - Granbury, TX

I buy my real estate in most part for short term investment and my program is to pay off as soon as I can or pay cash to save on the interest.  In a lot of cases I will borrow against CDs or other instruments at only 1.5% above the CD rate for short term investments, on a property that I am going to resell as soon as I can.  This way I can go to the bank and get a loan within a couple of hours to do what ever I want.  This saves a lot of closing cost and helps me to return what would be a larger interest charge into another investment. 

I know there are many different plans out there on how different investors operate but the above works good for me.

May 17, 2008 12:36 PM
Lisa Lambert
The Law Offices of Elisabeth A. Lambert - Fresno, CA
Esq. 1031 Exchange Expert

Ken:

Nice post with some great points of view regarding the benefits of 1031 exchanges.

May 17, 2008 04:38 PM
Ken Tharp
Iowa Equity Exchange - West Des Moines, IA
Section 1031 Exchanges, Iowa/U.S.

Robert - I can't and won't argue with anything you say. In fact, if you read my reply to Greg above, I cited examples of property owners who buy for the reasons you mention. And I agree, overleveraging can lead to problems. Releveraging, however, say from 50% equity to 25%, can mean the difference between a good investment program and a great one. One of the great things about being in a position where you can consider an exchange is that you have equity in the first place! You're just putting that equity to work in a different, presumably better, investment.

Ken Tharp, Iowa Equity Exchange

May 19, 2008 02:05 AM
Ken Tharp
Iowa Equity Exchange - West Des Moines, IA
Section 1031 Exchanges, Iowa/U.S.

Don - Thanks for your comments. There are so many ways to benefit from real estate. You've found one that works for you. I buy and flip properties, too, occasionally, but I know going in that I'm either going to have to use my cash or pay the interest to the bank. I also know I've got to face that nasty self-employment tax issue at the end of the year. I still do flips when they make sense.

If it's working for you and you like it, stick with it!

Ken Tharp, Iowa Equity Exchange

May 19, 2008 02:10 AM
Ken Tharp
Iowa Equity Exchange - West Des Moines, IA
Section 1031 Exchanges, Iowa/U.S.

Lisa - Thank you for commenting. As you know, exchanges offer the investor the only way to redirect all of his equity from one investment into another. One of my favorite ways to explain why the IRC allows this is the phrase, "The IRS does not consider that one's investment itself is changing; merely the form of that investment," therefore there should be no tax owed. Thanks again!

Ken Tharp, Iowa Equity Exchange

May 19, 2008 02:17 AM