Special offer

My opinion on the forced green movement in Austin.

By
Real Estate Broker/Owner with Affinity Properties, Inc 509937

I posted a note about the potential point of sale green update ordinance in Austin a few days ago. Here's my thoughts on the issue now that I've had a few days to think about it.

There’s no denying the importance of eco-conscious living. We have, after all, caused considerable damage to the environment. Whatever we can do to reverse this should be done, but because we want to not because our mayor or government as a whole says we should.           

The new energy efficiency ordinances currently under consideration by Austin officials are not the solution to our environmental problems. They are in fact the opposite. Few in this country like to be told what to do; they like even less to be kept from completing their plans, which in this case would be selling their home. Their reaction, therefore, to the ordinances would be largely hostile, most likely creating an environmental backlash. Those currently claiming that the green movement is based in nothing more than unsubstantiated hype would garner support from the frustrated. The eco-consciousness building in today’s society would be shadowed by anger and annoyance.

The key is not to force the citizens of Austin to bow to the government’s will. Nothing will be accomplished if we force residents to install costly measures before they can move forward with their plans. If we do, they will only know the negative. We must instead find ways to properly educate them on the benefits of being green. There are many - tax rebates, higher property values, longer lasting properties and a future on this Earth - and if they know this, they may be willing to voluntarily install the energy efficient systems Austin is so vehemently supporting.

If you think differently, I'd love to know why. I'm always open to changing my mind. :)

Joe

Spillman Ranch Property for Sale | Austin Real Estate Blog

 

Karen Anne Stone
New Home Hunters of Fort Worth and Tarrant County - Fort Worth, TX
Fort Worth Real Estate

Joe:  Perhaps the negative reaction you antitipate from sellers might be offset by a positive reaction from buyers.  Austin is a very progressive city.

May 20, 2008 06:32 PM
Tom&Amy Garcia
Realty One Group, The Garcia Group - Las Vegas, NV

Going green is always a great topic for debate, in Las Vegas we have a great potiential source of energy, how and when we utilize the sun will be interesting to see.

not knowing the details of you local ordinance I can only say that change is often difficult.  I travel to Europe often and know that we have a lot of room for improvement at home.

 

May 20, 2008 06:51 PM
Katerina Gasset
The Gasset Group & Get It Done For Me Virtual Services - Provo, UT
Amplify Your Real Estate & Life Dreams!

Joe- Government needs to stay out of our lives, period, end of story, no ifs, ands, buts! They need to butt out of our lives, our money and our businesses. Do not dictate to home sellers what they have to have to satisfy the green movement. My mom was a green movement person in the 60's when it was not popular to be so, when you did not make money doing so. I embrace Capitalism and now that companies figured out they can make money on the green band wagon they all jumped on it. That is fine and dandy, more money to be made, always a good thing. But don't go getting the government to back you up on all of it just to impose your rules on the American population. I am sorry Joe, my son just came back from Austin. He was thinking about moving there, he still might, but he said that it was far to the left and that is giving him second thoughts. Katerina

May 20, 2008 07:05 PM
Tony & Darcy Cannon
Aubrey and Associates Realty - Layton, UT
The C Team

Joe, I agree with Nestor and Katerina, the government, regardless of what level of government needs much less and not more involvement in our lives.  In order for the green movement to work, the technology has to become cheaper than the alternative, and I am not talking taxation.  I think ot the energy efficient light bulbs, the electricity that they save and the longevity of the bulb far outweigh the increased costs of these bulbs.  The rest of the technology has to get to that simplistic level of cost vs gain in order for the majority of people to embrace it.  I would love to install solar panels on my roof, but I won't go that much further into debt to do so, as soon as I am in a position that I have that much extra money laying around, if it is cost effective, I am going to install them.  That should be my choice, not the governments.  I have basically a xeroscaped backyard, because I chose to, not because someone told me to do so.  This should be an issue of choice, not of force.

May 20, 2008 07:16 PM
Joe Cline
Affinity Properties, Inc - Austin, TX

Thanks for your thoughts!

When I was researching the whole green movement and what makes things green there were some inteersting facts about what makes something green in one place could make it not green in another. I'll give an example. In Austin we build a lot with limestone. The neophyte green advocate would say tsk tsk because stone is enrergy intensive to mine etc. The fact is that we have a mine just north of Austin so shipping is very easy. If you look at an alternative like cementatious boards that would be proposed as "better" by green standards, you might see that the nearest factory is hundreds of miles from Austin. So the energy used to create package, ship, and paint the cementatious boards might actually be higher than using stone.

Basically, it's a complex process to determine what is green and what is not and I think it varies by location and use. For the city to mandate specific upgrades seems counterproductive to me and in certain cases could be less green than an alternative.

May 20, 2008 07:33 PM
Anonymous
Laura

Joe, I completely agree with you.  There are too many potential problems with this concept.  It seems to me that the city is just trying to think of ways to get their hands in our pockets.  I am pro-green, of course, growing up in Oregon, but Austin needs to reward, not require, for going green.

Jul 05, 2008 10:12 AM
#6
Laura McKinney
Keller Williams Realty - Austin, TX
eAgent

Joe,

I completely agree with you.  There are too many problems that would come up from this.  It seems to me that the city is trying to get their hands into our pockets.  I am pro-green, of course, I grew up in Oregon but Austin should reward, not require, for going green.

Jul 05, 2008 10:15 AM
Betina Foreman
WJK Realty - Austin, TX
Realtor, C.N.E., with WJK REALTY

Dear Joe,

I think the only way for this project to work is to give sellers an incentive to do the green updates, not to penalize the poor for selling homes they can no longer afford to pay the taxes on. I think the city, county and state government needs to get out of our pocketbooks.  They need to mind their own business and stop making mandates for the people. What ever happened to a government run for the people and by the people?!?!?

Betina

Jul 26, 2008 04:04 AM