

If you don't pay your property taxes the city or county government can take your house away from you.
Most of us know that simple bit of information to be true and if you don't believe me, head over to the courthouse and ask the clerk to show you how many parcels of land, homes and commercial zoned properties are about to be sold for the cost of the delinquent taxes, including any interest and penalties that might be applied to the bill.
If you don't pay the lien in two or three years or so after the taxes pass the due date the tax collector can foreclose on your home and sell it at the next tax sale.
Usually, about thirty days prior to the sale, the county clerk advertises the sale listing the properties that are included.
This might be a great way for a predator to pick up a great deal, but sadly at the expense of someone who's going through some really tough times, someone who just couldn't become financially adjusted enough to save their own home.
Try to help homeowners avoid this situation.
We have an obligation as real estate professional to try to find ways to remedy these tragic events and create a healthy economic balance for our neighborhoods.
Make it a priority and help save someone's home, and their family. Forget about commissions for a while, if you can, and perform a socially redemptive community service that will reward your heart.
Proverbs 28:8 "He that by usury and unjust gain increaseth his substance, he shall gather it for him that will pity the poor."
14 Comments on Property Tax Liens : Contemporary Dilemma ?
If anyone wants to find out who really owns their home, try not paying real estate taxes for a couple of years. Property taxes are among the most regressive and unfair, because they aren't adjusted for income.
This usually goes unnoticed in the public as it is not advertised. I have seen someone buy a home for $80,000 which they then sold for $300,000 a month later.
So right, Brian, however, theoretically, and please allow some room for my reply expressing an opinion based on incomplete evidence :-), the ad valorem tax takes into consideration present value and future income based on levels of appreciation, hence adjusted for the present market value which could translate into capital gains. Perhaps that could, indeed, command a little more investigation. I really enjoy hearing from you and hope your having fine weekend. I hope to make it back to the Poconos one day for a visit. It's been years since I was there. I represented my college for a student leadership training event in 1972, so it's been a long time; but I'll always remember the splendor and beauty of the region, and the friends.
Good to hear from you, Adam. I've taken friends to the courthouse along with cma's and bpo's on napkins to the trustee's sales to demonstrate the market value compared to the awarded bid prices. Their jaws drop when they see the hammer prices. Memphis is a hot foreclosure mecca. Tragically, bankruptcy is epidemic, too. Cries of disparity, redlining, etc. are a daily occurrence. Thanks for your comment.
David...I do know what a scary prospect being taken for taxes can be...but I also know that in some small towns there is still the opportunity for reduction or even abatement depending on circumstances
Hi Joan. Any opportunity for tax relief, in any form, should be a welcome opportunity. Seniors in Memphis recieve a fine reprieve from the county trustee. Hope your having a fine weekend.
David, I'm glad you enjoyed your visit to the Poconos!
Replying to your comment: it's not the right of the taxing authorities to decide whether people on a fixed income, or low income, may some day realize a profit on their home. It's the individual's home, not the municipality's. The owner bought it , maintained it, and made payments on it for years.
It's morally wrong to tax property so high that the owners can't afford to stay in them. The owner has the right to keep the home they paid for. Property rights are part of the Constitution.
I agree with you, Brian. Thanks for following up. The same logic applies to upper middle and higher income levels. Many upper level income homeowners are losing their homes daily to the county trustees, nationwide.
David, I agree with your comment on middle and upper income income tax levels. I have long been an advocate of a fair flat tax rate. And a significant reduction in the rate of government spending, which would reduce all taxes.
Brian, in my county there's a relief program, shelbycountytrustee.com , overseen by the county trustee which supplements the property tax for the elderly and disabled. Eventually some creep in governement will try to take the relief program away due to the loss in revenue because of the thousands of homes and parcels of land that have foreclosed and are about to foreclose. It's inevitable. If something is too good to be true it usually is. I can't wait to find out who the Sheriff of Nottingham Forest will turn out to be.
David, some 30 years ago, Howard Jarvis led a property tax revolution called Proposition 13 in California. I think our country is ready for another Howard Jarvis.
That 1% full cash value cap on the property sure put some money back into the homeowners pockets, Brian. I remember Proposition 13. One of the best things about it was the requirement of two thirds majority of the legislative house body vote to increase the tax rate.
There's a negative side to Proposition 13 because it freezes the value of properties at the time they're purchased with a two percent annual assessment cap. Properties of equal value have huge amounts of variation in their assessment, even if they are right next to each other. If the price of a house is considered a factor of somebody's riches, and representative of a homeowners ability to pay the tax, because values are frozen, residential and commercial property owners would receive less benefit from the proposition who purchased a property at different periods of time becasue they would pay a different assessment. A bit of inequality here. A condition is introduced into the tax structure where the rate decreases as the amount of value increases. I think that your state sales tax kind of works along these lines, too.
Maybe that's what Arnold was actually dropping a hint about when he played Mr. Freeze in Batman, you think, Brian? :-)
David, what with the inequities of any property tax, I think property shouldn't be taxed at all, or at a very low rate.
Good point, Brian. Sorry for the late reply.