Help - Yes No

Many of us realized that lenders and mortgage servicers are giving short sales a “cold shoulder”. It simply doesn’t make sense that lenders and mortgage servicers don’t seem to care for success of short sales, as they don’t seem to have incentives (!) to do so. A good friend of mine and even better broker sent me a link to the excellent article from Money magazine – “WHY MORE HOMEOWNERS AREN’T GETTING HELP? It is an eye opener.

Did you know “that servicers have financial reasons for not helping homeowners who fall behind? As middlemen, they are paid a small percentage - usually 0.25% - of the principal of each loan they administer (0.5% for subprime loans). That's about $250 for every $100,000 borrowed, about $21 a month. But when borrowers fall behind, late fees alone can be $25 or more and exceed what servicers may be paid to maintain an up-to-date loan.”

Mortgage servicers do have a little incentive to do so. One my wonder, why the same happens with lenders who do both, keep loans and service them. The answer to it might be quite easy. Loss mitigation, foreclosures and loan servicing are done by different departments. Those of us who have a corporate background know very well that corporate departments are measured on departmental goals and not on corporate goals (most of the time). Thus, being from different department might separate loan mitigation, foreclosures and loan servicing departments well enough for all of them not to share the common goal – helping their clients to keep properties.

Additionally, loss mitigation and loan workout cost money. Obviously, neither lender not mortgage servicers like the idea of spending money to loose money through short sales and other option. However, what they have to realize, that they will loose much les money, than through foreclosures. So, someone in the loan industry has to wake up. Helping homeowners helps you (I hope it does not sound to novel!). To find out more about pain, despair  and confusion among homeowners facing loss of their properties check also Credit Consequences of Short Sales

 
Post is included in group: Realtors®
Post is included in group: Mortgages
Post is included in group: Running a Brokerage
Post is included in group: All About Mortgages/Mortgage Networking
Post is included in group: Everything California

5 Comments on Why loss mitigation and short sales are not happening?

JUN
17
2008
611,510 Points 244 Featured Posts Localism Sponsor Outside Blog

Artur, I guess there is so much involved with their decisions that we just don't know. Lately though I seem to be having much more success at least with the communication side of things. I make initial contact with the loss mitigation departments at time of listing and they are actually calling me now looking for a contract!!! How's that for change in attitude. I currently have short sales on the table with:

Wells Fargo
Countrywide
HomeEq Servicing
5th 3rd Bank

And all 4 have been very very responsive, thus far. I've been pleasantly surprised with their new attitudes.

7:49am • #1

Bryant,

These is very welcome news.  The attitude has to change (I am glad that you observed it already happening), as lenders CANNOT (in a long run) AFFORD to do otherwise.  I did or am doing short sales with Option One, Indymac, Countrywide, Wells Fargo, BOA, Homecomings, Saxon, Aurora and before negotiations - we still hav the same chaos.  Negotiaitions, seem to happen better (is it because it is simply another department - I canno t say).  Thank you very much for your comment Bryant.

9:42am • #2
127,400 Points

Hi Artur: In Washington State, the new law that classifies "distressed properties" will definitely put a crimp in a lot of this stuff. Basically, the law states that if a realtor takes a listing where the seller is found to be either behind in their payments or judged to be at risk, the seller can come back and sue the realtor if they feel they've been taken advantage of on the final price. Up here, realtors are trying to get out of their listings if they're judged to be at risk. We're living in interesting times these days!

 

Paul

3:58pm • #3

Paul - I have a foreclosure services firm in Washington State that helps homeowners with loan modifications and short sales. We are a Distressed Home Consultant under the new law. We work with real estate agents who use our umbrella organization to mitigate their liability. In essence, they can wear two hats, one as a Distressed Home Consultant for Washington Foreclosure Assistance, and as a real estate agent for their agency. We're at http://www.washfa.org. ~ Ross Kilburn

Ross Kilburn
6:17pm • #4

Paul and Ross, very intersting. Thank you for sharing.  In CA agents cannot reperesent investors in pre-foreclosure deals. Representing buyers who have intention to occupy a property is OK. To be more precise, the law in CA requires agents to have a special type of bond equal to two times valus of the property to be able to represent investors (so called "equity purchasers").  It is a catch-22 reequirement, as such bonds are not available in CA.  So, agents representing pre-foreclosures (including short sales) have to be very cautious.

6:45pm • #5

Leave a response…



(optional)
What does the graphic say?
 
Rainmaker_large

Artur Urbanski

Burlingame, CA

More about me…

Cimpler Real Estate, Inc.

Address: 533 Airport Blvd., 4th Fl., Burlingame, CA, 94010

Office Phone: (650) 401-2245

Cell Phone: (415) 672-5051

Email Me

MLS evolution, key driving factors, new companies providing innovative services and products, local news from Burlingame and the San Francisco Peninsula.


Links

Archives

RSS 2.0 Feed for this blog

Find CA real estate agents and Burlingame real estate on ActiveRain.